Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message

TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

T430-T490, T530-T590 Series
Post Reply
Message
Author
mirileh
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2015 12:28 pm
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel

TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

#1 Post by mirileh » Wed May 25, 2016 5:28 am

I understand that IPS screens show better color, can be seen from different angles and have a higher resolution. But are they better or worse when it comes to eyestrain? (for working on texts and using the net with a T440S/T450S)

dr_st
Admin
Admin
Posts: 9710
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am
Location: Israel

Re: TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

#2 Post by dr_st » Wed May 25, 2016 5:49 am

On average, especially in laptops, IPS screens have better contrast, so they will be better for prolonged work with text with less eye strain. But that's on average. Fundamentally, contrast matters more than viewing angles for this.

However, some particular TN screens (again, especially in laptops) may have so poor viewing angles, that every little shift of your head will cause colors to change, which can by itself cause strain.
Thinkpad 25 (20K7), T490 (20N3), Yoga 14 (20FY), T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X220 4291-4BG
X61 7673-V2V, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G, X32 (IPS Screen), A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad

exTPfan
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Nov 23, 2007 5:38 pm
Location: Ann Arbor, MI

Re: TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

#3 Post by exTPfan » Wed May 25, 2016 6:13 am

In my experience working for long periods on text with mathematics, the most important factor is how black the blacks are. Here IPS wins. Some TFT screens are OK, for example, those on the T42, but many are terrible, for example, those on the X301 and some T61 s. The website notebookcheck.net measures black levels. They should be about 0.3 cd/m^2 or less. For example, the T42/T60 IPS 15in screens are 0.30; the T42 TFT 14in is 0.64; the T61 TFT 14in is 1.1; and the X301 TFT is 1.85.
Work: T60/61 FPad (Win 7, UXGA IPS); T60/61 FPad (Win 7, UXGA IPS); forever.
Toys: X1 (first gen, Win 7); T450s (Win 7).

Puppy
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2821
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

Re: TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

#4 Post by Puppy » Wed May 25, 2016 11:28 am

LED backlight low PWM frequency also contributes to it and blurry fonts have probably the biggest impact http://annystudio.com/misc/anti-aliased-fonts-hurt/

There are many cutting costs tricks used these days to make display look and feel crappy. All TN panels are crap and the IPS tag itself does not guarantee anything, you always have to read detailed review of the display on notebookcheck or similar web.
ThinkPad (1992 - 2012): R51, X31, X220
Huawei MateBook 13

hhhd1
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 500
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 7:23 pm
Location: Cairo, Egypt

Re: TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

#5 Post by hhhd1 » Wed May 25, 2016 1:06 pm

3 factors IMO are very important for avoiding eye strain:

1. Hich contrast, the higher the better, usually IPS have higher, but there are some pretty crap IPS available now, in which case, a TN with higher contrast may not be that bad.
2. PWM (see the above post)
3. extra color spectrum coverage, .. anything more than sRGB causes 'shiny colors' that tends to hurt over long periods of usage, there are very cheap LCDs with extra coverage of only one color, while having bad coverage for the rest of the colors, which make colors VERY yellow, or VERY red. ..etc.
===

hhhd1
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 500
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2014 7:23 pm
Location: Cairo, Egypt

Re: TFT VS IPS - regarding eyestrain?

#6 Post by hhhd1 » Sat Jun 18, 2016 5:29 pm

hhhd1 wrote:2. PWM (see the above post)
3. extra color spectrum coverage, .. anything more than sRGB causes 'shiny colors' that tends to hurt over long periods of usage, there are very cheap LCDs with extra coverage of only one color, while having bad coverage for the rest of the colors, which make colors VERY yellow, or VERY red. ..etc.
I am quoting myself to update my view on this point.
extra saturation are more hurtful when a screen has PWM, so ..
if your screen has PWM, reducing color saturation make things less straining.

extra saturation + PWM is pretty horrible and unusable in some cases.

I still could be wrong though, no enough testing to validate my point.
===

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T430-T490 / T530-T590 Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests