Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message
Thinkpadders, do NOT Rejoice, WEEP and/or DESPAIR!
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Mon Jun 29, 2015 1:18 pm
- Location: Kailua, Oahu, HI
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Came up with an anti-glare ThinkLight design ("Two ThinkLights, Crossed"). Tested by taping LEDs to the lid of my T430. If David Hill does dual ThinkLights, I hope it would be arranged like this:
full size:
http://s3.postimg.org/el4vk8hy9/thinklight001.jpg
thumbnail:
alternate link:
https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaem ... iginal.jpg
How it works:
Glossy black plastic has a lot of specular reflection and very little diffuse reflection.
White paint has some specular reflection and a lot of diffuse reflection.
The usual ThinkLight position causes specular reflections of the LED to bounce off the black plastic of the keys straight into your eyes. By shining the lights from different angles, the specular reflections off the black plastic are directed to the sides away from your eyes, while the diffuse reflections off the white lettering are still visible. Basically the whites stay white while the black no longer glares. Result is better keyboard visibility.
full size:
http://s3.postimg.org/el4vk8hy9/thinklight001.jpg
thumbnail:
alternate link:
https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaem ... iginal.jpg
How it works:
Glossy black plastic has a lot of specular reflection and very little diffuse reflection.
White paint has some specular reflection and a lot of diffuse reflection.
The usual ThinkLight position causes specular reflections of the LED to bounce off the black plastic of the keys straight into your eyes. By shining the lights from different angles, the specular reflections off the black plastic are directed to the sides away from your eyes, while the diffuse reflections off the white lettering are still visible. Basically the whites stay white while the black no longer glares. Result is better keyboard visibility.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:43 am
- Location: North Central Florida, US
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
And this is why Lenovo should listen to ThinkPadders. We're willing to give them R&D for free so we can make sure there's a great computer on the market.mydreamlaptop wrote:Came up with an anti-glare ThinkLight design ("Two ThinkLights, Crossed"). Tested by taping LEDs to the lid of my T430. If David Hill does dual ThinkLights, I hope it would be arranged like this:
full size:
http://s3.postimg.org/el4vk8hy9/thinklight001.jpg
thumbnail:
alternate link:
https://a.disquscdn.com/uploads/mediaem ... iginal.jpg
How it works:
Glossy black plastic has a lot of specular reflection and very little diffuse reflection.
White paint has some specular reflection and a lot of diffuse reflection.
The usual ThinkLight position causes specular reflections of the LED to bounce off the black plastic of the keys straight into your eyes. By shining the lights from different angles, the specular reflections off the black plastic are directed to the sides away from your eyes, while the diffuse reflections off the white lettering are still visible. Basically the whites stay white while the black no longer glares. Result is better keyboard visibility.
T420 i5-2520M 2.50GHz 4 GB RAM 64-bit OS WIN7pro SP1
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Woah, that's really nicemydreamlaptop wrote:Came up with an anti-glare ThinkLight design ("Two ThinkLights, Crossed").
I'm happy and thankful that you went through the effort of testing and picturing your idea. Looks good to me.
I sure hope Lenovo trials your concept and, if the results are conclusive, implements it. (Dual Thinklight + backlight solutions would be best).
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
That is great!mydreamlaptop wrote:Came up with an anti-glare ThinkLight design ("Two ThinkLights, Crossed").
Hope they do it like you explained.
===
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
I love reading Lenovo's excuses about 4:3 being an impossibilitiy, and then reading this article, and my poor brain explodes at the contradiction....
http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/21/90087 ... ad-android
Knowing Samsung, they'll have 12+" tablets very shortly. Yes, they're AMOLED, but it should demonstrate the desire for them by the market. But who am I to know anything...
http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/21/90087 ... ad-android
Knowing Samsung, they'll have 12+" tablets very shortly. Yes, they're AMOLED, but it should demonstrate the desire for them by the market. But who am I to know anything...
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:43 am
- Location: North Central Florida, US
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
As with everything, if Apple's doing it, it's cool.plympton wrote:I love reading Lenovo's excuses about 4:3 being an impossibilitiy, and then reading this article, and my poor brain explodes at the contradiction....
http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/21/90087 ... ad-android
Knowing Samsung, they'll have 12+" tablets very shortly. Yes, they're AMOLED, but it should demonstrate the desire for them by the market. But who am I to know anything...
That attitude really annoys me.
T420 i5-2520M 2.50GHz 4 GB RAM 64-bit OS WIN7pro SP1
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
It's also worth noting that Apple commissioned the 4:3 panels for their own production, and then everyone else got to use them.
Lenovo would also have to commission a 4:3 panel, and for that, they'd either have to charge a lot, or they'd have to make the machine their volume model - which I suspect could mean that a 14.1" 4:3 T92 would be the only 14" machine that Lenovo would sell - no T460, no E460, no 14" IdeaPad, no 14" Yoga, etc., etc.
Honestly, I think the three basic form factors that make sense if you're doing custom panels (before going into subnotebooks) are 13.3" 16:10 (286 mm x 179 mm) for a notebook (A4 size), stretch it vertically for 14.1" 4:3 (286 mm x 215 mm) for a laptop, stretch that horizontally for 15.3" 3:2 (323 mm x 215 mm), 16.0" 16:10 (344 mm x 215 mm) or 16.6" 16:9.5 (362 mm x 215 mm) depending on how you want to handle the keyboard and how weird you want to go with the display.
Lenovo would also have to commission a 4:3 panel, and for that, they'd either have to charge a lot, or they'd have to make the machine their volume model - which I suspect could mean that a 14.1" 4:3 T92 would be the only 14" machine that Lenovo would sell - no T460, no E460, no 14" IdeaPad, no 14" Yoga, etc., etc.
Honestly, I think the three basic form factors that make sense if you're doing custom panels (before going into subnotebooks) are 13.3" 16:10 (286 mm x 179 mm) for a notebook (A4 size), stretch it vertically for 14.1" 4:3 (286 mm x 215 mm) for a laptop, stretch that horizontally for 15.3" 3:2 (323 mm x 215 mm), 16.0" 16:10 (344 mm x 215 mm) or 16.6" 16:9.5 (362 mm x 215 mm) depending on how you want to handle the keyboard and how weird you want to go with the display.
Current: X201 (i5-540M, 8 GiB, 160 GB), 365XD (120 MHz, 72 MiB, 6.4 GB, 4x CD-ROM, 10.4" TFT)
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 8545
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
I actually read this article because it's kind of a slow afternoon for me.plympton wrote:http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/21/90087 ... ad-android
I think it's silly to conclude that the 4:3 screen is the only reason that iPad remains the best-selling tablet. It's one reason, but more importantly, the iPad is very well made overall, has reliable software, looks premium, and has the Apple logo.
The author's claim that HP's 4:3 Touchpad failed because of lousy software is also incorrect. WebOS was widely praised, and to this day I prefer it over Android, iOS, and Windows Phone. For example, swiping an app off the screen to close it is simply brilliant. The Touchpad failed because it was heavy, bulky, made of cheap plastic, used outdated hardware, priced way too high, and had a useless app store.
For sub-10" tablets, I do agree with the author that 4:3 works better than widescreens. As tablets get bigger though, more people will start to view two pages side by side just like they do on widescreen laptops, for which 3:2 is optimal, since it minimizes the amount of unused space. In fact, though my phone is "only" 7-inch, I already view some PDF files (sheet music) in two-page mode.
Samsung already has a 12.2" Android tablet, although it's 16:10 (2560x1600): http://www.samsung.com/us/mobile/galaxy ... 9000ZWAXARplympton wrote:Knowing Samsung, they'll have 12+" tablets very shortly.
Dell Latitude 7370 (QHD+, 2.84lb); HP Pavilion x2 12-b096ms (1920x1280, 3.14lb); Microsoft Surface 3 (1920x1280, 2.00lb);
Dell OptiPlex 5040 SFF (Core i5-6600); Acer ET322QK, T272HUL; Crossover 404K; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 5040 SFF (Core i5-6600); Acer ET322QK, T272HUL; Crossover 404K; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Well, the TouchPad did have software problems, even ignoring the app gap (which was pretty bad, let's be honest) and the fact that you had to install Preware to get a lot of the software.
WebOS had some excellent UI decisions, but the OS was incredibly inefficient at actually getting anything done - you had to install a ton of tweaks from Preware and overclock the tablet to 1.5 GHz minimum to get it to really be usable. Meanwhile, Android 4.x was perfectly usable even at 1.2 GHz, and at 1.5-1.7 GHz, it was actually quick, even on the "outdated" hardware that HP used. For that matter, because HP put some rather fast eMMC in there, it was faster than a lot of high-end Android tablets in non-gaming use (I distinctly remember the guy who started the TouchPad port of CyanogenMod deciding to not develop a port for the Transformer Pad 700, because in actual use, it was far slower due to the eMMC, despite having, oh, over twice the CPU power). It was a solid midrange device hardware-wise, really.
And, yes, it was somehow absurdly heavy for what it was... not sure how they got it that heavy, but they did. That's ultimately why I didn't use mine much, and ended up using a very small laptop instead.
Now, though, I'm using a WinBook TW700 (which I almost bought as a joke - "a $60 Windows tablet? Screw it, that's cheap enough to buy as an impulse buy to see how bad a $60 Windows machine can possibly be!") in that role, and if I need a keyboard, I use the ThinkPad Bluetooth keyboard (which is significantly larger than the tablet, I know).
WebOS had some excellent UI decisions, but the OS was incredibly inefficient at actually getting anything done - you had to install a ton of tweaks from Preware and overclock the tablet to 1.5 GHz minimum to get it to really be usable. Meanwhile, Android 4.x was perfectly usable even at 1.2 GHz, and at 1.5-1.7 GHz, it was actually quick, even on the "outdated" hardware that HP used. For that matter, because HP put some rather fast eMMC in there, it was faster than a lot of high-end Android tablets in non-gaming use (I distinctly remember the guy who started the TouchPad port of CyanogenMod deciding to not develop a port for the Transformer Pad 700, because in actual use, it was far slower due to the eMMC, despite having, oh, over twice the CPU power). It was a solid midrange device hardware-wise, really.
And, yes, it was somehow absurdly heavy for what it was... not sure how they got it that heavy, but they did. That's ultimately why I didn't use mine much, and ended up using a very small laptop instead.
Now, though, I'm using a WinBook TW700 (which I almost bought as a joke - "a $60 Windows tablet? Screw it, that's cheap enough to buy as an impulse buy to see how bad a $60 Windows machine can possibly be!") in that role, and if I need a keyboard, I use the ThinkPad Bluetooth keyboard (which is significantly larger than the tablet, I know).
Current: X201 (i5-540M, 8 GiB, 160 GB), 365XD (120 MHz, 72 MiB, 6.4 GB, 4x CD-ROM, 10.4" TFT)
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
This passage retained my attention:plympton wrote: http://www.theverge.com/2015/7/21/90087 ... ad-android
To pursue my earlier hypothesis on Lenovo's mindset, they possibly thought they were too "diverse". That is, too different - and too different due to sticking to an older design. Hence they found themselves out of fashion. And hence, the Apple-isation of everything, including the keyboard.The iPad keeps winning, at least in part, because everyone around it keeps getting lost in the chase for diversification. Maybe it’s better to let that go and focus on simply being better, and on beating the iPad on its own terms.
As we all know, this was a massive failure. Because they failed to understand was that they were out of fashion, certainly, but not out of relevancy.
They also failed to understand that fashion is cyclical, and that square-ish formats could regain acceptance. See: Apple Ipad & clones, Chromebook Pixel, and last but not least, mechanical keyboards.
Finally they forgot a business mantra: focus on what you do best.
What was the Thinkpads' best asset? Ding ding ding, you've guessed it: that very same keyboard that Lenovo put into the trashbin.
And when you trash your best competitive advantage, what happens to your sales and brand recognition? They become rubbish!
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Nah, gotta credit them for that: a squarish slate is much more ergonomic to use than a wide one.Nigellus wrote: As with everything, if Apple's doing it, it's cool.
Apple shouldn't sheepishly be followed when it comes to keyboards, thinness obsession, DRMs and closed systems; because all of that is effectively uncool (and the reason why I'll never buy into their ecosystem). However the marque does tend to have good ergonomic clues, and that should be acknowledged.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:43 am
- Location: North Central Florida, US
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
I'm not faulting Apple for that. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. My objection is to "trendy" thinking in the masses.Summilux wrote:Nah, gotta credit them for that: a squarish slate is much more ergonomic to use than a wide one.Nigellus wrote: As with everything, if Apple's doing it, it's cool.
Apple shouldn't sheepishly be followed when it comes to keyboards, thinness obsession, DRMs and closed systems; because all of that is effectively uncool (and the reason why I'll never buy into their ecosystem). However the marque does tend to have good ergonomic clues, and that should be acknowledged.
When companies that make things I want to buy follow the lead of the stopped clock because the stopped clock is "cool" I have to wait until one of the two times of day when the clock is right in order to get my needs met.
Good on Apple for realizing a good aspect ration when they see one. Bad on the public for needing Apple to tell them. And bad on the other companies who follow aesthetic trends to the determent of their products.
T420 i5-2520M 2.50GHz 4 GB RAM 64-bit OS WIN7pro SP1
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
The problem with the companies that have decided to follow the stopped clock is that their clocks are moving, but never on time and hence never right...not even twice a day...Nigellus wrote:
I'm not faulting Apple for that. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day. My objection is to "trendy" thinking in the masses.
When companies that make things I want to buy follow the lead of the stopped clock because the stopped clock is "cool" I have to wait until one of the two times of day when the clock is right in order to get my needs met.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 331
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 10:43 am
- Location: North Central Florida, US
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
You have no idea how much we're on the same page right now.ajkula66 wrote:
The problem with the companies that have decided to follow the stopped clock is that their clocks are moving, but never on time and hence never right...not even twice a day...
T420 i5-2520M 2.50GHz 4 GB RAM 64-bit OS WIN7pro SP1
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
T60 1951-46U Intel Core Duo 1.83GHz 1 GB RAM 60 GB XPpro
TP 600E 2645 PII 366MHZ 160MB RAM 37.2GB WIN98SE
Computers do exactly what you tell them at amazing speeds; this can be bad if what you told them wasn't what you had in mind.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
As for angling the two "thinklights" I am not sure how that would work on a plane for example. The single thinklight works so why mess with it.
Active --- Love the X series
X301 W 7/Mint | X201 540M L Mint | X220 2520 W7/Mint
Nostalgia
X61 T7500 / T41 T42 T43 / A31
Rogue daily driver - Samsung RV511 15.6 " Screen - W 7
X301 W 7/Mint | X201 540M L Mint | X220 2520 W7/Mint
Nostalgia
X61 T7500 / T41 T42 T43 / A31
Rogue daily driver - Samsung RV511 15.6 " Screen - W 7
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
You could cut off the beam of the ThinkLights to the sides so that it doesn't extend past the keyboard, though.
Current: X201 (i5-540M, 8 GiB, 160 GB), 365XD (120 MHz, 72 MiB, 6.4 GB, 4x CD-ROM, 10.4" TFT)
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21
Past: T61p 15.0" QXGA, T60p 15.0" QXGA, X61 Tablet SXGA+, R51e 14.1" XGA, X21
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
this week's survey should be about CPU, GPU, RAM etc.
Current ThinkPad: T430u, T430s, X1 Carbon, X1, X230t, X220t, X230, X220, X201t, W520, W701ds, T500, T420 and many more
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Let's see if they'll propose a soldered option for the RAMlead_org wrote:this week's survey should be about CPU, GPU, RAM etc.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Now that one is going to be *really* interesting, and this is where I predict the final forming of the two camps:lead_org wrote:this week's survey should be about CPU, GPU, RAM etc.
a) Re-vamp X301 camp
b) Re-vamp T60 or T500 - depending on whether we're discussing a 4:3 or a 16:10 - camp...
I'll be there, bright and early...
I'd be extremely surprised if they don't.Summilux wrote: Let's see if they'll propose a soldered option for the RAM
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
-
- Junior Member
- Posts: 445
- Joined: Wed May 16, 2012 3:36 pm
- Location: Salinas, CA
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Actually, that's one of the great things about a ThinkLight, you can use it to illuminateYou could cut off the beam of the ThinkLights to the sides so that it doesn't extend past the keyboard, though.
a small area around the laptop.
Daily Drivers: W520 i7-2760QM | W520 i7-2860QM | T420 FHD IPS i7-2640m | W701
Others: W510 | 701C (on its shrine)
Non-TP: Dell m7510
Currently Experimenting With: T420s
Others: W510 | 701C (on its shrine)
Non-TP: Dell m7510
Currently Experimenting With: T420s
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
For the sake of it, then. Because I expect the large majority of would-be Classic buyers to loathe soldered memory. They're not giving in to extreme thinness so there's no reason they'd vouch for this.ajkula66 wrote: I'd be extremely surprised if they don't.
It'd be nice, though not so realistic, if the dual Thinklights could be fitted with a variable orientation.bit_twiddler wrote: Actually, that's one of the great things about a ThinkLight, you can use it to illuminate
a small area around the laptop.
Position 1: optimised for keyboard - less specular reflection.
Position 2: optimised for the surroundings - much more specular reflection but illuminates outside the keyboard area.
Oh and by the way, by the time this potential Thinkpad Classic project ships, it should be fitted with Skylake and this means good things in terms of graphics and battery life: http://www.fanlesstech.com/2015/07/excl ... boost.html
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
... and:ajkula66 wrote:
Now that one is going to be *really* interesting, and this is where I predict the final forming of the two camps:
a) Re-vamp X301 camp
b) Re-vamp T60 or T500 - depending on whether we're discussing a 4:3 or a 16:10 - camp...
I'll be there, bright and early...
...
c) Re-Vamp T43p 15inch, i.e. T50! in 4:3!
I think that would be possilbe:
Lenovo could produce and update all three lines in a three year cycle.
Lophiomys
Thinkpads with 15inch 4:3 UXGA 133DPI IPS/Flexview: 2x T43p SATA Mod., 3x T42p (dying by Flexing), 2x T60p (1xATI, 1xIntel/new BoeHydis);
R51 SXGA+; X31; X41T; X41 Sata Mod; all Made in China; 570E, 701C; MBP15c3UB non-glossy mid09 / formerly 600X, 760E
Thinkpads with 15inch 4:3 UXGA 133DPI IPS/Flexview: 2x T43p SATA Mod., 3x T42p (dying by Flexing), 2x T60p (1xATI, 1xIntel/new BoeHydis);
R51 SXGA+; X31; X41T; X41 Sata Mod; all Made in China; 570E, 701C; MBP15c3UB non-glossy mid09 / formerly 600X, 760E
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Unfortunately, old friend, I believe that we've lost that opportunity. Not that I'm going to stop fighting for it by repeating the same request ad nauseam to anyone willing to hear me out...lophiomys wrote:
... and:
c) Re-Vamp T43p 15inch, i.e. T50! in 4:3!
I think that would be possilbe:
Lenovo could produce and update all three lines in a three year cycle.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Lenovo can do anything, if there are enough people willing to pay. 10,000 of is willing to fork out 5000 USD for a laptop, then i would think it is better to go with a X301 remake of some sort. 3:2 would go great with butterfly keyboard.
Current ThinkPad: T430u, T430s, X1 Carbon, X1, X230t, X220t, X230, X220, X201t, W520, W701ds, T500, T420 and many more
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
That statement doesn't really say much, does it?lead_org wrote:Lenovo can do anything, if there are enough people willing to pay.
Count me out HERE and NOW since there's no way in hell I'd spend $5K on a coffee-shop machine, retro or not.10,000 of is willing to fork out 5000 USD for a laptop, then i would think it is better to go with a X301 remake of some sort. 3:2 would go great with butterfly keyboard.
Give me a *proper* 15" or larger workstation, and take my money. Probably times two.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
One FlexView to rule them all: A31p
Abused daily: T520, X200s
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
Same here.
Given the technological possibilities of the 21st century and cheap production in China,
there is absolutely no justification to charge 5000 for a good laptop-workstation without diamonds and ivory inlaying!
The response to the Chinese T50 project and to the "Time Machine - Retro Thinkpad" blog post is proving that a substantial number of customers actually want a Classic Thinkpad.
Given the technological possibilities of the 21st century and cheap production in China,
there is absolutely no justification to charge 5000 for a good laptop-workstation without diamonds and ivory inlaying!
The response to the Chinese T50 project and to the "Time Machine - Retro Thinkpad" blog post is proving that a substantial number of customers actually want a Classic Thinkpad.
Lophiomys
Thinkpads with 15inch 4:3 UXGA 133DPI IPS/Flexview: 2x T43p SATA Mod., 3x T42p (dying by Flexing), 2x T60p (1xATI, 1xIntel/new BoeHydis);
R51 SXGA+; X31; X41T; X41 Sata Mod; all Made in China; 570E, 701C; MBP15c3UB non-glossy mid09 / formerly 600X, 760E
Thinkpads with 15inch 4:3 UXGA 133DPI IPS/Flexview: 2x T43p SATA Mod., 3x T42p (dying by Flexing), 2x T60p (1xATI, 1xIntel/new BoeHydis);
R51 SXGA+; X31; X41T; X41 Sata Mod; all Made in China; 570E, 701C; MBP15c3UB non-glossy mid09 / formerly 600X, 760E
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
"Count me out HERE and NOW since there's no way in hell I'd spend $5K on a coffee-shop machine, retro or not.
Give me a *proper* 15" or larger workstation, and take my money. Probably times two."
here, here...times 10,000!!! being a fan of backups/redundancy/better safe than sorry approaches, i'd be glad to buy 2 or even 3 of these "retro" machines if they're properly done.
........no offense to anyone who disagrees of course, but i can't believe people would be willing to fork over so much cash (possibly thousands of $!) for anything less than a true workstation replacement. i admit to being biased to t6x/t500's, but seriously, why bother getting something that's ultimately not *that* different from a t420/430, or a small-form x** etc etc??!! imo the biggest benefit of this retropad should be to bring back something that's dramatically different from today's machines, like the *truly* extinct **15"** 4:3 t60 (or 15" t4x etc)
......that said, being the owner of several t500's w/wsxga+ lcd's, i'd also "settle" for an upgrade of that great machine if they insist they can't bring back 4:3. (for me 16:10 or 3:2 is a reasonable compromise since 16:9 is hellish for anyone who needs to actually *read* anything on their laptop...incl. web sites!!)
Give me a *proper* 15" or larger workstation, and take my money. Probably times two."
here, here...times 10,000!!! being a fan of backups/redundancy/better safe than sorry approaches, i'd be glad to buy 2 or even 3 of these "retro" machines if they're properly done.
........no offense to anyone who disagrees of course, but i can't believe people would be willing to fork over so much cash (possibly thousands of $!) for anything less than a true workstation replacement. i admit to being biased to t6x/t500's, but seriously, why bother getting something that's ultimately not *that* different from a t420/430, or a small-form x** etc etc??!! imo the biggest benefit of this retropad should be to bring back something that's dramatically different from today's machines, like the *truly* extinct **15"** 4:3 t60 (or 15" t4x etc)
......that said, being the owner of several t500's w/wsxga+ lcd's, i'd also "settle" for an upgrade of that great machine if they insist they can't bring back 4:3. (for me 16:10 or 3:2 is a reasonable compromise since 16:9 is hellish for anyone who needs to actually *read* anything on their laptop...incl. web sites!!)
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
I could never justify spending that much money on a laptop, even if Lenovo brought back the T4* or T60 with modern internal hardware. Even paying half that amount is still alot, but if I can get a mid-high spec one for $2000, that would be my limit.lead_org wrote:Lenovo can do anything, if there are enough people willing to pay. 10,000 of is willing to fork out 5000 USD for a laptop, then i would think it is better to go with a X301 remake of some sort. 3:2 would go great with butterfly keyboard.
Current Thinkpads: W530 (functional classic keyboard mod), X301, T61, T60, T43, A31p, T23, 600X, 770
Other: mk5 Toughbook cf-19, mk1 Toughbook cf-53
Other: mk5 Toughbook cf-19, mk1 Toughbook cf-53
-
- Senior ThinkPadder
- Posts: 8545
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
When I started buying laptops in 2002, I was willing to spend well over $1,000 on a laptop, despite being a grad student on a meager stipend. My first laptop was a $1,760 Dell Inspiron 8200. In following five years or so, I would buy several more $1K+ laptops (plus lots of cheap used laptops just for fun). Now I have more money, but wouldn't pay more than $800 for any laptop, even if I think it's perfect.
I suspect lots of folks exaggerate how much they are willing to pay for this Classic Thinkpad. Unfortunately, Lenovo might actually believe them and expects this project to be lucrative. Lenovo will proceed with the production, and people will get excited, but most will back off once they learn that the price tag is $5,000. Lenovo will lose their shirts and vow to never attempt any "retro" experiment again.
I suspect lots of folks exaggerate how much they are willing to pay for this Classic Thinkpad. Unfortunately, Lenovo might actually believe them and expects this project to be lucrative. Lenovo will proceed with the production, and people will get excited, but most will back off once they learn that the price tag is $5,000. Lenovo will lose their shirts and vow to never attempt any "retro" experiment again.
Dell Latitude 7370 (QHD+, 2.84lb); HP Pavilion x2 12-b096ms (1920x1280, 3.14lb); Microsoft Surface 3 (1920x1280, 2.00lb);
Dell OptiPlex 5040 SFF (Core i5-6600); Acer ET322QK, T272HUL; Crossover 404K; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 5040 SFF (Core i5-6600); Acer ET322QK, T272HUL; Crossover 404K; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Re: Thinkpadders Rejoice (*LARGE PICS*)
pianowizard wrote:When I started buying laptops in the early 2000s, I was willing to spend well over $1,000 on a laptop, despite being a grad student on a meager stipend. My first laptop, bought in 2002, was a $1,760 Dell Inspiron 8200. I would buy several more $1K+ laptops later in that decade. Now I have more money, but wouldn't pay more than $800 for any laptop, even if I think it's perfect.
I suspect lots of folks exaggerate how much they are willing to pay for this Classic Thinkpad. Unfortunately, Lenovo might actually believe them and expects this retro model to be lucrative. Lenovo will proceed with the production, and people will get excited, but most will back off once they learn that the price tag is $5,000. Lenovo will lose their shirts and vow to never attempt any "retro" experiment again.
I agree with your basic premise. A lot of what has driven down the cost/purchase price of laptops in the past 15 years has been due to economies of scale. In 2000, it was totally reasonable and expected to spend $2-4000 on a high end laptop (and even basic consumer grade machines came in at or above the $1k mark). By the time we hit the T60 era, for a machine most here would agree was still mostly an uncompromising business-grade design, that window was down substantially. Combine the lowered prices with the devaluation of the currency, and it's little shock that people are conditioned to spend far less now.
On top of that, the vast majority of users simply don't need high-end power by today's standards. A low to mid-grade dual-core processor is plenty for the average user, and even a several year old version is sufficient for normal use on modern operating systems. This stagnation has allowed many people to stop feeling the need to upgrade to the highest-level options available. For me personally, I can justify, but do not absolutely need top-tier performance. That said, I'm still happy to pay for a machine with modular parts design that has a long-term design lifecycle, unlike the majority of modern thin-and-lights. I paid $1400 for my current machine (bought on closeout; its MSRP was ~2k), and cannot fathom a modernized classic T-series coming in much below that. I honestly don't think it's coming anyway. A throwback X-series (preferably like X201 rather than X301, in order to get higher-power processors) would still be a compelling product to me though.
HP EliteBook 8460w/Scientific Linux 6.5
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
X230 trackpoint, mouse buttons and some keys still not working after keyboard change
by frog4 » Mon Jan 22, 2024 4:24 pm » in ThinkPad X230-X280 / X390 Series - 2 Replies
- 1842 Views
-
Last post by frog4
Tue Jan 23, 2024 5:22 am
-
-
-
I have a Lenovo Legion - I know it's not a thinkpad, but I have a question
by whoknows88 » Mon Nov 27, 2023 7:48 pm » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 5 Replies
- 3536 Views
-
Last post by whoknows88
Wed Nov 29, 2023 4:20 am
-
-
-
not able to install windows in t410
by Madmadytriesfixinghislap » Thu Nov 30, 2023 3:46 am » in ThinkPad T400/T410/T420 and T500/T510/T520 Series - 5 Replies
- 2530 Views
-
Last post by David C
Mon Dec 11, 2023 8:45 pm
-
-
-
W520 does not finish shutting down correctly
by crux » Fri Dec 01, 2023 6:43 pm » in ThinkPad W500/W510/W520 and W700/W701 Series - 1 Replies
- 4331 Views
-
Last post by axur-delmeria
Sat Dec 02, 2023 12:41 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests