thinkpads.com Support Community Forum Index Bill Morrow's thinkpads.com Open Forum - The Original Thinkpad Support Forum
Follow ThinkpadsForum on Twitter
eCoupons
Save hundreds direct from Lenovo Thinkpad
Exclusive 4% CASH BACK from eCoupons.com
Checkout the New thinkpads.com blog and web site
The NEW
thinkpads.com
website
Hard Drive Caddys - newmodeus.com
We also offer Drive Cloning solutions
Checkout the post here: http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=73945
Reflow
your T40
UK & EU
ThinkPad BIOS Recovery
ThinkPad BIOS Recovery
SALE Day - Everyday, all day! Deals & Rare Coupons
LogicBUY Coupons and Deals
It is currently Sat Jul 31, 2010 12:05 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Aug 22, 2007 2:02 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Member

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 4:23 pm
Posts: 248
Location: New York, NY
T60p, T7600, 3GB RAM, FireGL 5250, Vista Ultimate

Lowest score is from the graphics card, 4.3.

_________________
T60p


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 4:39 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: United States
this is from my T61p under ultimate x64...

processor (C2D T7700 2.4GHz): 5.3
memory (2x 2GB crucial DDR2-667): 4.8
graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.9
gaming graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.5
primary hard disk (hitachi 200GB 7K200): 5.4

lowest score highlighted in red. ;)

updated 11/16.   re-ran the test and memory is back down to 4.8 (which seems to be correct).

_________________
ThinkStation D10 · ThinkPad X301 · NEC 3090WQXi · IBM UPS 1500TLV


Last edited by erik on Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:50 pm, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 10:27 pm 
Offline
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus

Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
Posts: 4393
Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.
erik you have one powerful maxed out machine there. :)

_________________
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Sep 19, 2007 11:49 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: United States
yeah, lenovo builds a pretty good bento box regardless of what the suits at big blue say. :P

if the upcoming 4GB SODIMMS end up being compatible with this machine then it'll definitely last me for a few years.

_________________
ThinkStation D10 · ThinkPad X301 · NEC 3090WQXi · IBM UPS 1500TLV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 22, 2007 3:30 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Member

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:37 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Connecticut
erik wrote:
this is from my T61p under ultimate x64...

processor (C2D T7700 2.4GHz): 5.3
memory (2x 2GB crucial DDR2-667): 4.8
graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.9
gaming graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.5
primary hard disk (hitachi 200GB 7K200): 5.4

i'm actually surprised that 4GB of system memory wasn't enough to hit or break the 5.0 mark. that's kinda frustrating.

oh well. vista runs really fast on this machine regardless of the low memory number.


Very interesting comparison I'm getting, testing my T61p twice, comparing 64 bit to 32 bit, look at the difference in memory ops per second!

T61p 64 bit Vista Ultimate:
processor (C2D T7700 2.4GHz): 5.3
memory (2x 2GB Kingston DDR2-667, 4030MB recognized): 5.8
graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.9
gaming graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.5
primary hard disk (hitachi 100GB 7200rpm): 5.0

T61p 32 bit Vista Ultimate (same laptop as above)
processor (C2D T7700 2.4GHz): 5.3
memory (2x 2GB Kingston DDR2-667, 3070MB recognized): 4.8
graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.9
gaming graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.4
primary hard disk (hitachi 100GB 7200rpm): 5.0

_________________
2757CTO Lenovo W700 with 17"1920x1200,NVIDIA Quadro FX3700M
C: UltraBay Intel X25-M 80GB SSD,Vista 64 UltSP1
D: Seagate 7200.3 320GBx2 RAID0
Port Replicator 43R8782
hoping T61p's Verizon EVDO Sierra MC5725 usable in W700 w/new BIOS
WiMax capable 5350 installed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:16 pm 
Offline
moderator
moderator

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: United States
@tinkererguy: i've never seen any differences in performance numbers between 32-bit and 64-bit.   have you tried running the test again in x64 to make sure the memory results weren't a fluke?   i can't see kingston being one full point faster than crucial, especially since the module specs are identical.

update: i edited the XML results file and changed my memory results to 5.8, then re-ran the experience test.   memory should have gone back down to 4.8 but instead remained at 5.8.   clearly this test isn't very accurate or reliable.   oh well, i guess i can always just artificially boost my score to 5.9 across the board and make myself feel like i own the world's fastest thinkpad. :lol:

_________________
ThinkStation D10 · ThinkPad X301 · NEC 3090WQXi · IBM UPS 1500TLV


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:33 am 
Offline
Sophomore Member

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:37 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Connecticut
erik wrote:
@tinkererguy: i've never seen any differences in performance numbers between 32-bit and 64-bit.   have you tried running the test again in x64 to make sure the memory results weren't a fluke?   i can't see kingston being one full point faster than crucial, especially since the module specs are identical.

update: i edited the XML results file and changed my memory results to 5.8, then re-ran the experience test.   memory should have gone back down to 4.8 but instead remained at 5.8.   clearly this test isn't very accurate or reliable.   oh well, i guess i can always just artificially boost my score to 5.9 across the board and make myself feel like i own the world's fastest thinkpad. :lol:


FYI, I performed the test several times in each OS, results always came to within 0.1 of the posted results. Didn't even seem to matter if I killed off extra stuff for the test (like SAV 10.2 realtime virus scanning, sidebar, etc).

Anybody interested in looking at PerformanceTest V6.1 64 bit? Not sure if comparing runs of their product in 32 bit to 64 bit are valid, but I would think that would be the whole idea.

Meanwhile, I need to get back to work, and don't have dual boot (I need all my drive space), so retesting not an option for me in the near term, short of reimaging (Ghost or Vista's backup).

_________________
2757CTO Lenovo W700 with 17"1920x1200,NVIDIA Quadro FX3700M
C: UltraBay Intel X25-M 80GB SSD,Vista 64 UltSP1
D: Seagate 7200.3 320GBx2 RAID0
Port Replicator 43R8782
hoping T61p's Verizon EVDO Sierra MC5725 usable in W700 w/new BIOS
WiMax capable 5350 installed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Oct 18, 2007 2:31 pm 
Offline
Freshman Member

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:41 pm
Posts: 98
Location: Duisburg, Germany
T7300(2GHz), 1GB RAM, 80GB 5400rpm HD, 15.4in 1680x1050 LCD, 128MB nVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M, CDRW/DVD, Intel 802.11agn(n-disabled), Bluetooth, Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, UltraNav, Secure chip, Fingerprint reader, 6c Li-Ion, WinVista Business

processor : 4.9
memory : 4.5
graphics : 4.0
gaming graphics : 4.6
primary hard disk : 4.9

80GB 5400rpm HD ---> 4.9

Unbelievable!!

Update:

memory (2x 1GB Samsung) : 4.8
gaming graphic: 4.7

_________________
T60 T2400 1,83GHz 1GBRam ATI X1300 (Sold)
Z61t (9443-AA4) T5600 1,83Ghz 1GBRam 1400x900
T61 (6458 4UU)--> Just bought!( Now Sold!)


Last edited by Diehard on Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 01, 2007 9:23 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 9:34 pm
Posts: 6
This was my X60s rating when it was standard.

X60s (17045UG) Vista Business (32bit)
Processor (Intel Core DuoL2400 1.66GHz): 4.6
Memory (1GB Samsung DDR2-667): 4.5
Graphics (Intel 945GM/GU Express): 3.3
Gaming Graphics (Intel 945GM/GU Express): 3.1
HardDrive (80GB 5400): 4.2

This is my X60s rating with ram upgraded to 3GB & Hitachi 7K200 (with fresh install of Vista with all the latest ThinkVantage and Windows Updates).

X60s (17045UG) Vista Business (32bit)
Processor (Intel Core DuoL2400 1.66GHz): 4.6 :)
Memory (3GB Crucial DDR2-667): 5.3 :D
Graphics (Intel 945GM/GU Express): 2.7
Gaming Graphics (Intel 945GM/GU Express): 3.0
Harddrive (Hitachi 100GB 7K200): 5.3 :D

I can’t believe I’ve got 5.3 for RAM and harddrive!
Everything runs really fast now compared to before, I’ll never go back to a 5400 rpm harddrive.

Anyone got any ideas why my graphics are lower than before?

Cheers

Adam

_________________
--
IBM ThinkPad User
X60s (17045UG) Vista Business, 3GB, 100GB 7K200


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: X61T 1400x1050
PostPosted: Fri Nov 02, 2007 2:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:01 am
Posts: 27
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
Processor 4,7
Memory (4GB) 4,9
Graphics 2,6
Gaming: 3,2
Primary HD: 5,3

_________________
X61T Win7 64 bit, 1400x1050, 4GB RAM, 1GB Turbo Memory, Intel X25-M SSD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 06, 2007 3:24 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 9:32 am
Posts: 11
Location: Singapore, Singapore
Mine are:

Processor: 4.9
Memory: 4.5
Graphics: 4.4
Gaming Graphics: 4.0
Primary HD: 4.4

_________________
T60 (8743-CTO)
- T7200, 120 GB, 2 GB
- 15.4" W SXGA+_TFT
- Windows Vista Ultimate


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 7:07 am 
Offline
Freshman Member

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:02 pm
Posts: 78
Location: Montreal, Quebec
For a brand-new ThinkCentre A61e desktop (which is designed for energy efficiency, not performance, so while these numbers are anemic I actually find the performance fine for normal business use):

Processor: 4.8
RAM: 4.9
Graphics: 2.9
Gaming: 2.9
Hard disk: 5.6


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 9:42 am 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:18 am
Posts: 484
Location: Paris, France
I got the same memory score while using a 1GB module and 1GB module plus 512MB module. Can somebody explain me why the extra 512MB didn't make a difference? Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 03, 2007 6:01 am
Posts: 27
Location: Karlsruhe, Germany
With a new graphics driver from Intel (Lenovos is much older)
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... 642#354642
the score of my X61T is much better now:

Processor: 4.7
Memory (4GB): 5,7
Graphics: 3,5
Gaming: 3,5
HDD: 5.3

_________________
X61T Win7 64 bit, 1400x1050, 4GB RAM, 1GB Turbo Memory, Intel X25-M SSD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 4:50 am 
Offline
Freshman Member

Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 5:24 pm
Posts: 91
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Erik:

Which version of graphic adapter driver are you using? Seem you've got very high Graphic score regardless the gap between 128MB and 256M FX570M. Thanks
I just use the ThinkVantage->Update my system to get all latest drivers. From the device manger I can see the graphic adapter's version is 7.15.11.5666, issue date is 9/28/2007.


My T61P:
processor: 4.9
mem: 4.8
graphic 4.3
gaming: 5.1
Primary HD: 5.0

_________________
T61P 14.1'' SXGA+ 100G HD 2G RAM
T60 14.1'' SXGA+ 80G HD 2G RAM
Compaq Presario 5600
Compaq Armada M300


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:47 am 
Offline
moderator
moderator

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Posts: 2708
Location: United States
mike, i'm using the latest WHQL-certified nvidia driver from windows update.   the version is the same as yours; 7.15.11.5666.

update 11/16; memory score is back down to 4.8 where it should be.   that seems to be the correct number given what others have posted. :)

_________________
ThinkStation D10 · ThinkPad X301 · NEC 3090WQXi · IBM UPS 1500TLV


Last edited by erik on Fri Nov 16, 2007 4:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 6:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 31, 2007 5:46 pm
Posts: 34
Location: Kuwait City, Kuwait
Quote:
graphics (nVidia quadro FX 570M 256MB): 5.9



Hoo Lee Crap!!

_________________
T61P (6459-CTO) 15.4" / T7800 2.6 Ghz C2D / 160 GB 7200 / 4 GB RAM / 256 nVidia Quadro FX 570m / Intel Turbo RAM 1GB / Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
T43 (2668-71G) / T60 / R50e (temp)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:13 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:32 pm
Posts: 338
Location: Singapore
Here are my X61 scores in Vista Business x86:

Processor (T7300 2.0GHz) - 4.9
Memory (4GB G.Skill PC2-5300) - 4.8
Graphics (GMA X3100) - 3.5
Gaming graphics (GMA X3100) - 3.5
Primary hard disk (200GB 7K200) - 5.4

_________________
X61 7675-CTO Merom 2.0GHz 4GB RAM, 7K200 HDD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2007 1:58 am 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:05 pm
Posts: 558
Location: Boulder, Colorado
Processor (T7500 2.2GHz) - 5.1
Memory (3GB ) - 4.8
Graphics (Nvidia FX570 128M) - 4.3
Gaming graphics (Nvidia FX570 128M) - 5.1
Primary hard disk (100GB 7K200) - 5.0

_________________
IBM T61p,2.2GHz,4G,320G 7200,14.1, SXGA+,FX570,Atheros,Btooth,Finger,6c,Win7 RC 64bit
IBM T43,2GHz,2G,80G,14.1 SXGA+,X300,a,b,g,BT,finger,6c,Win7 RC 32bit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 09, 2007 7:52 am 
Offline
Sophomore Member

Joined: Wed Apr 05, 2006 9:58 pm
Posts: 209
Location: Raleigh, NC
Loaded Ultimate with Extras on my T43 1875-DMU, was pleasantly surprised. Most of the lenovo drivers loaded no problem. Still don't have internal ethernet though. (Lenovo driver refuses to install) Stock machine except for an upgraded 7K100 HDD, and an extra 1GB ram for a total of 1.25GB.

Over All: 1.0
Processor: 3.6
Memory: 4.4
Graphics: 1.9
Gaming Graphics: 1.0
Primary Hard Disk: 4.9

All the "innovation" in Vista has been turned off to help performance. It won't run Aero on Intel 900 but otherwise the machine runs OK. Wireless internet is nice and snappy, as is startup. But if you want to copy something to a USB stick, it takes three times as long. It also took two full hours to defrag my 60GB HDD.

Vista still has a long way to go before it is worth the price MS seems to think it is IMO. That full functionality isn't available on a machine that has just past it's second build birthday is pretty lame. MS seems to be convinced that people are going to go out and drop huge sums of money on new equipment to get full functionality, I just don't think that is happening.

This is a test install for me. I will be reverting back to XP until MS gets their act together and finally delivers the OS they promised all those years ago.

_________________
T43 1.8 / 2GB / 60GB 7K100 X31 1.4GHz / 2GB / 60GB 7K100
T20 700MHz / 512MB / 40GB 570E 500MHz / 320 MB
570 366MHz / 64MB (x2) 755CV 100MHz 486 / 8MB / 540MB


Last edited by losmeme on Mon Dec 17, 2007 9:18 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 10:10 pm 
Offline
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder

Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2005 3:52 pm
Posts: 3074
Location: Wash., D.C.
T42 2379-DXU

Base Score: 2.0

Processor: 3.5
Memory: 4.1 (1GB, 2 X 512MB)
Graphics: 2.0
Gaming Graphics: 3.4
Primary Hard Disk: 4.5

_________________
IBM T60p 2007-CTO 15" IPS UXGA w/Intel T7600 & ATI V5250 Home | X60s 1704-69U Travel
+ T4x w/R51 Intel GPU mobo | T60p 15.4" WSXGA+| R60 | R61e | Z61t | Z61p | T61 | T500


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Dec 16, 2007 11:59 pm 
Offline
Senior Member
Senior Member

Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:27 pm
Posts: 863
Location: Manhattan, NY
X61s, 1.8 GHz, 4GB, 200 GB 7200 HD, Vista Business 64
(see signature)

Processor (L7700 1.8 GHz) - 4.8
Memory (4GB PC2-5300) - 4.8
Graphics (GMA X3100) - 3.5
Gaming graphics (GMA X3100) - 3.5
Primary hard disk (200GB 7K200) - 5.4

Latest drivers from Windows Update.

_________________
X201s: 1440x900 LED backlit 2.13 GHz, 8 GB, 160 GB Intel X25-M Gen 2 SSD, 6200 a/b/g/n, BT, EVDO Rev A (USB), 6-cell, 9-cell, Windows 7 Ultimate x64


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Dec 18, 2007 3:51 pm 
Offline
Freshman Member

Joined: Fri Sep 14, 2007 2:41 pm
Posts: 98
Location: Duisburg, Germany
Have you guys ever seen Z61t with Intel® Graphics Media Accelerator 950 scores:


Graphics (GMA 950) - 4.2
Gaming graphics (GMA 950) - 3.1

in Vista?

_________________
T60 T2400 1,83GHz 1GBRam ATI X1300 (Sold)
Z61t (9443-AA4) T5600 1,83Ghz 1GBRam 1400x900
T61 (6458 4UU)--> Just bought!( Now Sold!)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:52 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2008 7:17 am
Posts: 6
Location: Martin, Slovakia (The Heart of Europe)
Here are my R61 scores in Vista Business 32bit:

Processor (T7100 1.8GHz) - 4.8
Memory (2GB) - 4.8
Graphics (NVS 140M) - 4.0
Gaming graphics (NVS 140M) - 4.7
Primary hard disk (120GB Hitachi) - 4.5


Jan Sedivy


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:42 am 
Offline
Freshman Member

Joined: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:54 pm
Posts: 54
Location: Vienna, Austria
T61 (7664-18G) with 4 GB RAM (Kingston KTL-TP667/2G), Windows Vista 32 Bit

Processor (T7300 2.0 GHz): 4.9
Memory (4 GB): 4.8
Graphics (NVS 140M): 4.0
Graphics gaming (NVS 140M): 4.7
Primary hard disk (Hitachi 120 GB): 4.4

Graphics driver version 7.15.11.145 (NVIDIA, 2007-06-25, by TV System Update).

_________________
T61 (7664-18G): T7300, 4 GB RAM, 120 GB SATA, 14.1 ", nVidia Quadro NVS 140M, Windows Vista Business 32 Bit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 16, 2008 5:59 pm 
Offline
Junior Member
Junior Member

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 7:18 pm
Posts: 367
Location: SoCal
Here's mine:

Processor - 4.9
Memory (RAM) - 4.5
Graphics - 4.3
Gaming Graphics - 4.7
Primary Hard Disk - 4.8

T60p - T7200, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200RPM, 256MB RAM GL5250

CJ
:)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Jan 20, 2008 8:00 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:26 pm
Posts: 13
Location: Reno, NV USA
Here are my Z61t (base w/o DVI output)scores in Vista Business x86:

Processor (T2400 1.83GHz) - 4.7
Memory (2 GB Ram 667 MHz 1 Stick Stock, 1 Stick Adata) - 4.7
Graphics (GMA 945) - 3.5
Gaming graphics (GMA 945) - 3.1
Primary hard disk (80 GB 5400 RPM Hitachi) - 4.9

Update:

New 250GB WD Scorpio

Processor (T2400 1.83GHz) - 4.7
Memory (2 GB Ram 667 MHz 1 Stick Stock, 1 Stick Adata) - 5.4
Graphics (GMA 945) - 3.5
Gaming graphics (GMA 945) - 3.1
Primary hard disk (250 GB 5400 RPM WD Scorpio) - 5.1

_________________
Go fast or go home

ThinkPad T60p 2613HQU
Processor: Intel Core 2 Duo T7600 (2.33GHz, 4MB L2, 667MHz FSB)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:42 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Member

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:37 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Connecticut
erik wrote:
@tinkererguy: i've never seen any differences in performance numbers between 32-bit and 64-bit.   have you tried running the test again in x64 to make sure the memory results weren't a fluke?   i can't see kingston being one full point faster than crucial, especially since the module specs are identical.

update: i edited the XML results file and changed my memory results to 5.8, then re-ran the experience test.   memory should have gone back down to 4.8 but instead remained at 5.8.   clearly this test isn't very accurate or reliable.   oh well, i guess i can always just artificially boost my score to 5.9 across the board and make myself feel like i own the world's fastest thinkpad. :lol:


Fair enough, found this great site about handling the xml:
http://blogs.tech-recipes.com/shamanste ... ase-score/

retesting shortly and will post new results. Thank you!

_________________
2757CTO Lenovo W700 with 17"1920x1200,NVIDIA Quadro FX3700M
C: UltraBay Intel X25-M 80GB SSD,Vista 64 UltSP1
D: Seagate 7200.3 320GBx2 RAID0
Port Replicator 43R8782
hoping T61p's Verizon EVDO Sierra MC5725 usable in W700 w/new BIOS
WiMax capable 5350 installed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Jan 23, 2008 9:56 pm 
Offline
Sophomore Member

Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 5:37 pm
Posts: 133
Location: Connecticut
Basically, I made a copy of this folder
C:\windows\Performance\WinSAT\DataStore

then deleted all the xml files in that folder. When going to test performance, it indicated that it hadn't been run before, a good sign. Bingo, you were right, my score of 5.8 was a one-off fluke, not repeatable. Since it doesn't go backwards without deleting the XML, I was wrong in trusting what it said.

Here's my new results, cut and pasted from clicking on "View and print details" at the conclusion of the run:

4.8 Determined by lowest subscore

Processor Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700 @ 2.40GHz 5.2
Memory (RAM) 3.93 GB 4.8
Graphics NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 5.9
Gaming graphics 1023 MB Total available graphics memory 5.5
Primary hard disk 106GB Free (186GB Total) 5.3

_________________
2757CTO Lenovo W700 with 17"1920x1200,NVIDIA Quadro FX3700M
C: UltraBay Intel X25-M 80GB SSD,Vista 64 UltSP1
D: Seagate 7200.3 320GBx2 RAID0
Port Replicator 43R8782
hoping T61p's Verizon EVDO Sierra MC5725 usable in W700 w/new BIOS
WiMax capable 5350 installed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: T61 8891CTO - 14" non widescreen
PostPosted: Sun Feb 10, 2008 11:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 2:48 am
Posts: 1
Location: Swords, Ireland/ Woodbridge, NJ/ London, UK
Vista Ultimate (makes it sound like that BP gasoline)

Processor (T2300@ 2Ghz): 4.9
Memory (2x 2GB, only 3GB, the hack not put in place): 4.8
Graphics (Nvidia NVS 140M): 4.1
Gaming Graphics: 4.7
Primary Hard Drive (Hitachi HTS541612J9SA00): 4.9

Must admit the regular graphics being worst than the gaming graphics made me laugh somewhat!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group