Take a look at our
ThinkPads.com HOME PAGE
For those who might want to contribute to the blog, start here: Editors Alley Topic
Then contact Bill with a Private Message

Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

General Questions, Rumors, Real news & More
Post Reply
Message
Author
CASPER
Freshman Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:22 am
Location: Bobrowiec, PL

Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#1 Post by CASPER » Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:38 am

General question - Do you regard xx40 series and newer ones to be really that bad over older brothers? And why?
Classic series (up to xx20) are getting older and older, and some of us need more power, also lighter is an advantage, as is a trackpoint.
But what about build quality of newer ones? Just reading forums, watching reviews made me think they are built using worse materials, more plastic and less metal (no rollcage). I have seen fairly new units (under a year of usage) with cracks near hinges, on palmrest and on other places - things that happened to my T500 after 7-8 years of abuse.

The reason I ask this questions is simple - I have seen T440s, x240 can be bought in new condition for about 700-800 dollars, and I am curious how this price compare with it's built quality, performance and reliability. I wonder if buying older and cheaper T440s could be a good idea considering that T470s is 1750 USD and more (ludicrous price IMO), so twice the money for older brother.

Thanks in advance.

Thinkpad4by3
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2670
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:25 am
Location: N. Bellmore, ny

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#2 Post by Thinkpad4by3 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:41 am

My X240 died after 3 years of service. Wont recognize RAM anymore. Granted that machine got upgraded one too many times but still, no T520 I experimented on let me down.

Oh, and the back panel is a PITA to get ona and off. Its clamps and screws.
Thinkpad4by3's Law of the Universe.

The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.

CASPER
Freshman Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:22 am
Location: Bobrowiec, PL

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#3 Post by CASPER » Wed Aug 02, 2017 12:20 pm

Ok, that is one vote against :) So they changed build philosophy and it was followed by lower build quality? 3 years is what I get from 200$ new laptop. Not optimistic.

I also heard about faulty motherboards in T440. Wonder if that is truth.

Thinkpad4by3
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2670
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:25 am
Location: N. Bellmore, ny

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#4 Post by Thinkpad4by3 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 6:57 pm

My dad's company is switching from Thinkpads to Latitudes.

1: Because Dell is their client and they Dell wants them to use their machines.

2: Because People and IT are pee'd at the T440 and T450.

BTW this is after 20 years of using Thinkpads.
Thinkpad4by3's Law of the Universe.

The efficiency of two screens equally sized with equal numbers if pixels are equal. The time spent by a 4:3 user complaining about 16:9 is proportional to the inefficiency working with a 16:9 display, therefore the amount of useful work extracted is equal.

brchan
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:43 am
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#5 Post by brchan » Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:31 pm

I have a t450 at work. Fit and finish is good and the system is physically quite solid. Only complaint is the keyboard and the screen rubbing against the keyboard. Not very eye pleasing either but other than that it's nice.
Current Thinkpads: W530 (functional classic keyboard mod), X301, T61, T60, T43, A31p, T23, 600X, 770
Other: mk5 Toughbook cf-19, mk1 Toughbook cf-53

TPFanatic
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2235
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2015 11:29 pm
Location: Boston, Massachusetts

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#6 Post by TPFanatic » Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:15 pm

The problem is that they are gray and Thinkpads are supposed to be black.

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 17303
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Belgrade, Serbia

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#7 Post by ajkula66 » Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:32 pm

TPFanatic wrote:
Wed Aug 02, 2017 9:15 pm
The problem is that they are gray and Thinkpads are supposed to be black.
LOL.

My take on T440p that I've played with in a store when they first came out was that it felt more like a funky EliteBook than a ThinkPad.

Now, to answer the OP's initial question...I guess that it all depends on how one defines "that bad".

Even if one deems the keyboard layout acceptable, the trackpad/palmrest area should be swapped with the one from *50 series in order for the user to keep some sanity, IMO.

Is the build quality problematic in general? Apart from the usual "screen lottery", probably not more than what most people have gotten used to.

Now, are these systems really *that* more capable than their *20/*30 predecessors? My take is that they're not, and for my purposes they have way too many design-related negatives to be considered even for free, but to each their own.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

One FlexView to rule them all: A31p

Abused daily: T520, X200s


PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

shawross
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 662
Joined: Mon Oct 28, 2013 5:48 am
Location: Perth Australia

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#8 Post by shawross » Wed Aug 02, 2017 10:07 pm

Laptop prices over the years have dropped dramatically across the industry and margins are tight for the remaining producers.

Something has to suffer the consequences IMO. The old adage you get what you pay for I believe is true enough here.

If you want the fastest and lightest Laptop then you can purchase a newer Thinkpad which probably will serve you well.

Will it have the build or quality materials of older Thinkpads? No.
Active --- Love the X series
X301 W 7/Mint | X201 540M L Mint | X220 2520 W7/Mint

Nostalgia
X61 T7500 / T41 T42 T43 / A31

Rogue daily driver - Samsung RV511 15.6 " Screen - W 7

fatpolomanjr
Sophomore Member
Posts: 198
Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 2:11 pm
Location: Moreno Valley, CA USA
Contact:

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#9 Post by fatpolomanjr » Thu Aug 03, 2017 1:32 am

x450 and later are ok. The aspect ratio and keyboard can use some work, but screen resolution is decent. Some newer designs even have xps 13-style thin bezel displays.

I would buy newer thinkpads if they were at least 16:10 and 7-row keyboard. I could live with the current 6-row since I began seriously thinkpadding fairly late in the game (2010 or so). The only reason I haven't moved onto apple with their 16:10 or surface with their 3:2 displays is due to lack of trackpoint.
T14s | AUO 14" FHD Low Power 400 nit | Ryzen 7 4750u | Windows 10
T70 | 15" UXGA LED with RealBlackStuff LED-Cable-Mod | i7-7700HQ | Windows 10
X62 | 12.1" SXGA+ Xiphmont LED | i7-5500U | Xubuntu / Windows 10

ZaZ
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4710
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:33 pm
Location: Minnesota

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#10 Post by ZaZ » Thu Aug 03, 2017 2:56 am

Better or worse depends on your goal. Are ThinkPads as durable when they used to cost $3,000? Probably not, but they cost a lot less too, meaning many more people can afford them, and almost every ThinkPad now has an IPS screen option, even the lowly E series. I'd say those were improvements over older ThinkPads. If you've abused your T500 for seven to eight years and it hasn't had any problems, you probably got lucky more than anything else.
ThinkPad L14 - 2.1GHz Ryzen 4650U | 16GB | 256GB | 14" FHD | Win11P
ProBook 470 G5 - 1.6GHz Core i5 | 16GB | 2.2TB | 17" FHD | Mint

CASPER
Freshman Member
Posts: 79
Joined: Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:22 am
Location: Bobrowiec, PL

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#11 Post by CASPER » Thu Aug 03, 2017 7:25 am

brchan wrote:
Wed Aug 02, 2017 7:31 pm
Only complaint is the keyboard and the screen rubbing against the keyboard.
Are you getting any marks on the screen?
Last edited by CASPER on Sun Oct 15, 2017 4:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

brchan
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Jun 01, 2014 11:43 am
Location: West Lafayette, Indiana

Re: Are series xx40 and newer really that bad?

#12 Post by brchan » Thu Aug 03, 2017 6:50 pm

Are you getting any marks on the screen?
I get key marks fairly easily, but they easily come off with a microfiber cloth.

One thing I forgot to mention was that although the laptop feels very tight and rigid, the plastics will develop shine quite fast. I only had this laptop for a month and it is pretty noticeable on the trackpoint keys and palmrest. However, I will add that the plastic itself feels less cheap than on xx10 - xx30 models.
Current Thinkpads: W530 (functional classic keyboard mod), X301, T61, T60, T43, A31p, T23, 600X, 770
Other: mk5 Toughbook cf-19, mk1 Toughbook cf-53

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 16 guests