Any (official) statements from Lenovo regarding IPS panels ?
-
Puppy
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Any (official) statements from Lenovo regarding IPS panels ?
Is there any official statement from Lenovo regarding future of ThinkPad T series ? It seems as they have big problem with IPS display panels manufacturer (discussed here). If they were going to replace it with crappy TN panels the value of ThinkPad notebooks would have dropped down dramatically 
Last edited by Puppy on Sun Mar 11, 2007 6:36 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
K. Eng
- Moderator Emeritus

- Posts: 1946
- Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2004 7:10 am
- Location: Pennsylvania, United States
Can anyone elaborate on the grainy/sparkly surface? I've seen this complaint on business class notebooks of recent manufacture, but I've never heard it in connection with the T series ThinkPad.
I hope IPS panels continue to be manufactured. They are really spectacular in color reproduction and viewing angle.
I hope IPS panels continue to be manufactured. They are really spectacular in color reproduction and viewing angle.
Homebuilt PC: AMD Athlon XP (Barton) @ 1.47 GHz; nForce2 Ultra; 1GB RAM; 80GB HDD @ 7200RPM; ATI Radeon 9600; Integrated everything else!
I have yet to see _ANY_ widescreen notebook panel that was IPS. And it doesn't seem like it's going to improve, because the trend now is to push IPS out of everything. Basically, even on standalone LCD monitors its virtually nonexistent below 20". Unless someone finds a significantly cheaper way to manufacture IPS panels, it looks like they are going to be extinct.z_24 wrote:Anyone with info on Flexview with the widescreen?
I'm currently waiting for it to come out, if ever.
Aren't you being too hasty here? If all SXGA+ T series equipped with LG panels were that terrible, Lenovo would be out of business by now. Most people who look at my notebook with the LG panel tell me that it's the best screen they've ever seen.Puppy wrote:It is probably no longer an issue since LG panels with "sparkle/grainy" surface makes even the T series useless for basic tasks like reading black text on white background
The latest discussion is here and it's not the first time it's been brought up, but I think it's being blown way out of proportion.K. Eng wrote:Can anyone elaborate on the grainy/sparkly surface? I've seen this complaint on business class notebooks of recent manufacture, but I've never heard it in connection with the T series ThinkPad.
Can't compete with them. If they are made a bit faster, they will be hands down the best, but even now, a 16ms/8msGTG IPS panel should be fast enough for all but the very extreme tasks. It's all about $$$.K. Eng wrote:I hope IPS panels continue to be manufactured. They are really spectacular in color reproduction and viewing angle.
-
Puppy
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Well, you are right that I bit overdid itdr_st wrote:Aren't you being too hasty here? If all SXGA+ T series equipped with LG panels were that terrible, Lenovo would be out of business by now. Most people who look at my notebook with the LG panel tell me that it's the best screen they've ever seen.
My scepticism is based on experience from "new technologies" in the past. I can not agree that Lenovo would be of business because people accepts nearly everything
Speaking of notebook displays, it is going worse every year regardless of what brand it is. I have seen latest Dell or HP displays and I couldn't believe anyone can actually buy and use such product. ThinkPad's IPS panels were the only exception because they deliver superior and persistent quality. You could be sure that any T series model with IPS panel will be perfect. Unfortunately recent complaints about LG panels (which are known having this issue) makes me worried about the quality (everyone is trying to save on the quality) because I'm sure most of people wouldn't notice it anyway. I'm still trying to find someone with T60 to check the display myself.
In a way, yes. But no one would accept being unable to read black text on white background.Puppy wrote:My scepticism is based on experience from "new technologies" in the past. I can not agree that Lenovo would be of business because people accepts nearly everything
Well, often you have to lose on something to gain on something else. MP3 allowed audio data to be 10 times as compressed as CD Audio, which is critical for storage and transfer rates, with only a minor loss in quality. LCD panels, although suffered from very noticeable setbacks, still saved lots of desk space and electricity, and for many people who just do word processing with their face stuck at the screen at 90 degrees the terrible angle effects and ghosting were and still are a non-issue. But no one would accept being unable to read black text on white background...Puppy wrote:There are many examples that the overall quality of a new technology did not bring any improvement (35 mm film -> DVD, HiFi -> computer audio, CD Audio -> MP3, PAL -> DVB-T, CRT -> LCD TN panels ... etc). In many cases the quality was horrible but still accepted by most of the people.
Glossy is the trend today, so manufacturers just put glossy coating on horrible TN panels and market is as "TrueLife", "VibrantColor", "BestPic", or God knows what. And people buy, because the first impression is "wow". And why bother with putting worthy notebook displays, it's not like you can just buy a new display for a notebook, so manufacturers don't feel threatened. I agree with you, it's sad.Puppy wrote:Speaking of notebook displays, it is going worse every year regardless of what brand it is. I have seen latest Dell or HP displays and I couldn't believe anyone can actually buy and use such product.
Look up old threads on Flexview in this forums and you see that complaints about it existed all the time, before LG panels were used. Different complaints, but still, it's not perfect. LG panels are just fine - it's not a step down in quality.Puppy wrote:ThinkPad's IPS panels were the only exception because they deliver superior and persistent quality. You could be sure that any T series model with IPS panel will be perfect. Unfortunately recent complaints about LG panels (which are known having this issue) makes me worried about the quality (everyone is trying to save on the quality) because I'm sure most of people wouldn't notice it anyway. I'm still trying to find someone with T60 to check the display myself.
-
Puppy
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
There's difference between unable and "your eyes hurts after 12 hours of reading with reasonable breaks" but I consider the latter as unable as well. Currently I don't have any problems with it (having the IDTech panel). I've seen those sparkle displays (although not the LG yet) and I must agree I'm unable to use it for a long-term work. It makes much more stress to keep the focus on the text while the background is changing with every little move of your head. I just hope the issue is not that visible on the LG panel but it made me worried.dr_st wrote:But no one would accept being unable to read black text on white background.
On my panel it's not visible at all, and I can spend hours reading text on it. It's easier on my eyes than my CRT.Puppy wrote:It makes much more stress to keep the focus on the text while the background is changing with every little move of your head. I just hope the issue is not that visible on the LG panel but it made me worried.
-
beeblebrox
- **SENIOR** Member

- Posts: 760
- Joined: Thu Nov 11, 2004 3:22 pm
- Location: No location is OK - BillM
I completely agree. Yesterday I checked the new Apple 20" Cinema display for potential purchase. That thing, being an S-IPS Display drove me crazy. Sparkling all over, making me dizzy after 20 minutes.Puppy wrote:There's difference between unable and "your eyes hurts after 12 hours of reading with reasonable breaks" but I consider the latter as unable as well. Currently I don't have any problems with it (having the IDTech panel). I've seen those sparkle displays (although not the LG yet) and I must agree I'm unable to use it for a long-term work. It makes much more stress to keep the focus on the text while the background is changing with every little move of your head. I just hope the issue is not that visible on the LG panel but it made me worried.dr_st wrote:But no one would accept being unable to read black text on white background.
I strongly prefer PVA or S-PVA displays, like in my current Samsung monitor. They blow IPS displays away in every way. I guess IPS will be history in a few years, they are heavy and thick, have too many polarisation layers and far too many transistors.
No other LCD technology on the market today gives picture quality like IPS. PVA and S-PVA is crap compared to IPS. Their viewing angles aren't as good, i.e. the images distorts (IPS remains perfect), and the response time on VA is horrible (Overdrive solves this for the most part, but introduces other problems). IPS really is superior to any other LCD technology today. The sparkling effect of some individual units or models doesn't change this.beeblebrox wrote:I strongly prefer PVA or S-PVA displays, like in my current Samsung monitor. They blow IPS displays away in every way. I guess IPS will be history in a few years, they are heavy and thick, have too many polarisation layers and far too many transistors.
And i'd really like to know the story about IDtech - what is left and what isn't and why everything went as it went and their displays are nowhere to be found in new products now....
Oh, and for the record:
I hate desktop LCDs, and here i am talking about the mainstream kind. Even at their lowest light setting they are blinding. The vivid cartoon calibrated colors makes it unsuitable for normal work, and i need to recalibrate with every new monitor. If you do a lot of field work, this gets tiresome. Also, everything seems to be focused at costs and response times these days, so it's nearly impossible to have special demands, if it can even be called that.
The flexview is at least til now the best display i have ever used. Yes it's response time is high, but the colors are natural and non offending and backlighting level is just perfect.
Oh, and for the record:
I hate desktop LCDs, and here i am talking about the mainstream kind. Even at their lowest light setting they are blinding. The vivid cartoon calibrated colors makes it unsuitable for normal work, and i need to recalibrate with every new monitor. If you do a lot of field work, this gets tiresome. Also, everything seems to be focused at costs and response times these days, so it's nearly impossible to have special demands, if it can even be called that.
The flexview is at least til now the best display i have ever used. Yes it's response time is high, but the colors are natural and non offending and backlighting level is just perfect.
-
Puppy
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
This is acutally sign of cheap LCD monitors only which are usually overbrighted. I got 20" NEC 2090UXi (A-TW-IPS panel made by LG/Philips). It has very good brightness settings allowing to set low brightness without color distortion.Troels wrote:I hate desktop LCDs, and here i am talking about the mainstream kind. Even at their lowest light setting they are blinding.
Agreed. And the Dell 2001FP is another good choice, though only available used now. Use the link below to locate S-IPS desktop monitors:Puppy wrote:This is acutally sign of cheap LCD monitors only which are usually overbrighted. I got 20" NEC 2090UXi (A-TW-IPS panel made by LG/Philips). It has very good brightness settings allowing to set low brightness without color distortion.
http://aryarya.net/wassyoi/lcdmemo.html
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)
-
Puppy
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
It seems as I found the answer here: http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=38898
today i spoke with several salespeople at lenovo. they uniformly confirmed that lenovo will be discontinuing all 4:3 screens. they claimed that this was a reaction to the marketplace, implying that it was becoming more difficult to obtain 4:3 panels. furthermore, there are no ips widescreens on the drawing board. therefore, it looks like flexview is being completely phased out
Good bye Lenovo .... I can buy cheap Asus instead
today i spoke with several salespeople at lenovo. they uniformly confirmed that lenovo will be discontinuing all 4:3 screens. they claimed that this was a reaction to the marketplace, implying that it was becoming more difficult to obtain 4:3 panels. furthermore, there are no ips widescreens on the drawing board. therefore, it looks like flexview is being completely phased out
Good bye Lenovo .... I can buy cheap Asus instead
Aha, I guess i need to go more by reviews, because what they have in shops here on display is the run-of-the-mill cheap 19" WS, and a few 20" WS too... I don't blame them, because they can't sell expensive stuff because people think a 20" WS is a 20" WS.Puppy wrote:This is acutally sign of cheap LCD monitors only which are usually overbrighted. I got 20" NEC 2090UXi (A-TW-IPS panel made by LG/Philips). It has very good brightness settings allowing to set low brightness without color distortion.
Trust me, you don't want an Asus. I have only ever seen ONE select model with a 4:3 IPS screen, and it was sheer luck to get one. A fellow here bought the exact same model, but it came with a TN panel which was glaring, couldn't display yellow colors and had uneven backlighting. But i guess it's more or less what is out there.
Yes, i'm pretty dissatisfied with Lenovo's descission too, but what other choice to they have? Not having to do with IDtech they can't do anything... IPS is ancient but impressive technology. But since it is expensive to produce, and S-IPS, etc. has taken over - Lenovo is not going to find anyone willing to produce it.
-
Puppy
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 2261
- Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
- Location: Prague, Czech Republic
Have you ever seen 14" SXGA+ ThinkPad display ? It is simply horrible.Troels wrote:A fellow here bought the exact same model, but it came with a TN panel which was glaring, couldn't display yellow colors and had uneven backlighting. But i guess it's more or less what is out there.
I don't believe it is not possible to find another producer. I bet the price of new T series remains the same while they save on display quality. My R51 (last R model with FlexView) was for 2000 EUR while new R60 with better configuration (but no FlexView) is for 1300 EUR.Troels wrote:Lenovo is not going to find anyone willing to produce it.
Actually MacBook Pro is supposed to have decent IPS display. Is it way to go ?
MacBook Pros have a PVA display; a nice (and bright) screen if the resolution is a good fit for your needs (it's a short-screen, not a wide-screen at 900 pixels high..)
Regarding this poll; I consider Flexview one of my favorite features of my T60p, but will continue to buy thinkpads without them if the quality remains steady (this notebook is, without a doubt, the toughest I've owned.)
I think IPS panels will persist, though not likely in notebooks with the advent of faster and cheaper PVA. S-IPA and SA-IPS reproduce color more accurately than other LCD technologies, so look for higher-end stand alone monitors if you want the tech.I guess IPS will be history in a few years, they are heavy and thick, have too many polarisation layers and far too many transistors.
Regarding this poll; I consider Flexview one of my favorite features of my T60p, but will continue to buy thinkpads without them if the quality remains steady (this notebook is, without a doubt, the toughest I've owned.)
-
Dimitri_P
- Junior Member

- Posts: 464
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:26 pm
- Location: • California •
- Contact:
I just got 30" and 23" Apple cinema displays (2nd gen), and I have both T60p 15" and 14" (have Minidock).
Anybody wants me to run tests, take some pictures, etc - to see the picture quality difference?
I have a tripod with Rebel XTi, so I can guarantee picture quality.
Also if you want to send me particular jpg or bmp picture files as test reference, and exact settings for the camera, I'm eager to do that.
Anybody wants me to run tests, take some pictures, etc - to see the picture quality difference?
I have a tripod with Rebel XTi, so I can guarantee picture quality.
Also if you want to send me particular jpg or bmp picture files as test reference, and exact settings for the camera, I'm eager to do that.
Dmitri, I just want to drool at the apple displays. If you have time, please do post some pics !!
Now: T60 2613-EKU | T23 2647-9NU | 600X 2645-9FU | HP 100LX
Past: X31 2673-Y13 | T41 2374-3HU | T22 2647-AEU
Rules of the road
Past: X31 2673-Y13 | T41 2374-3HU | T22 2647-AEU
Rules of the road
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 641 Views
-
Last post by intelfx
Fri Jan 13, 2017 9:28 pm
-
- 2 Replies
- 5837 Views
-
Last post by P3T3R
Thu Jan 12, 2017 9:56 am
-
- 12 Replies
- 295 Views
-
Last post by iModFrenzy
Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:11 pm
-
-
The official 755 Upgrade and general information Topic
by Thinkpad4by3 » Sun Mar 26, 2017 10:34 am » in ThinkPad Legacy Hardware - 39 Replies
- 1331 Views
-
Last post by ctg_s
Mon Apr 24, 2017 6:55 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: axur-delmeria and 3 guests




