Hardware experts: Can I reclaim a damaged HGST 7K60?
Posted: Tue Jun 28, 2005 11:04 pm
I recently removed from a friend’s T42 a 7K60 that was exhibiting ECC errors using PC-Doctor for DOS. IBM kindly shipped a replacement drive under warranty, but, although the support agent on the phone said that IBM wanted the bad drive back, the package delivered contained no prepaid return shipping, or return label, or even a return address. If we don’t hear from IBM within a week or so, I shall proclaim the damaged drive mine.
I retested the 7K60 as the second drive in my T30. It passed the initial PC-Doctor for Windows SMART test, but failed the extended test. I reran the PC-Doctor for DOS surface test, and found a number of sectors, apparently contiguous, either marked bad or registering ECC errors. I then ran FDISK /r /v several times; the first time through, it marked some sectors as bad, but after that first run it reported the exact same number of bytes in bad sectors each time: 10904KB, or about 0.02% of the disk’s capacity.
My question is this: What is the likelihood that, after conditioning the 7K60 using the HGST drive-fitness utilities, it will prove reliable enough to use as my primary drive, replacing the current slow 4200rpm 40GB drive?
I retested the 7K60 as the second drive in my T30. It passed the initial PC-Doctor for Windows SMART test, but failed the extended test. I reran the PC-Doctor for DOS surface test, and found a number of sectors, apparently contiguous, either marked bad or registering ECC errors. I then ran FDISK /r /v several times; the first time through, it marked some sectors as bad, but after that first run it reported the exact same number of bytes in bad sectors each time: 10904KB, or about 0.02% of the disk’s capacity.
My question is this: What is the likelihood that, after conditioning the 7K60 using the HGST drive-fitness utilities, it will prove reliable enough to use as my primary drive, replacing the current slow 4200rpm 40GB drive?