Cyclic Redundancy check errors: is this drive doomed? (CDROM

Performance, hardware, software, general buying and gaming discussion..
Post Reply
Message
Author
Red_October_7000
Freshman Member
Posts: 64
Joined: Sat Mar 11, 2006 11:46 pm
Location: Billerica, MA

Cyclic Redundancy check errors: is this drive doomed? (CDROM

#1 Post by Red_October_7000 » Tue May 23, 2006 1:36 pm

I've got a CDROM drive FRU 08K9545 that will give cyclic redundancy check errors. I got them a long time ago on my R30 loading Baldur's Gate II; by the time I got to the expansion CD it was giving errors consistantly. For some reason this was cured by using my backup copy of the CD (Yes, I'm the one guy who makes legitmate backups of software). Anyway, nothing happened for a couple years until this Sunday when the drive found itself inside my X20's Ultrabase X2 mediaslice installing Windows 2000. (the machine says it's designed for W2K or 98SE; when I got it it had ME on it....) So by the time I got to the CD with the Service Packs, I got an error in the middle of SP3, tried again and got lucky. By SP4 I couldn't get through it without long periods of idle terminating in the afforementioned cyclic redundancy check error. By putting in the Ultrabase the WORM drive I got with the machine (Which was living with my R30 for convenience), I got through the install easily and quickly. Why would this drive do this? Can it be saved? Admitedly the Ultrabay CDROMs are perhaps the most common and least costly items for the Ultrabay...
--------------------------------------------------------
ThinkPads:
R30 C900 376 MB RAM 40GB HDD
X20 C500 198 MB RAM 10GB HDD
730TE 486-DX4 75 8 MB RAM 260MB HDD
G40 2.6 GHz 760 MB RAM 35 GB HDD
Original (Leather notepad!)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests