How to test alternatives to Rescue & Recovery (R&R)?
Posted: Tue Apr 03, 2007 1:28 pm
I've read many posts on backup alternatives to R&R, including Ken Fox's excellent and detailed post here: http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... 324#268324
I understand that many forum members like Acronis True Image, and Norton Ghost 2003 can also successfully backup the entire disk image using the -ib switch. I own and fairly well know how to use Ghost 2003, but I am looking for something a little "slicker" than Ghost (i.e. easilty scheduled backups, incremental backups). So here are my questions:
How can I test a backup program and make certain that it images the "unique IBM boot sector", the "HPA" and all those other out-of the-way goodies I am struggling to keep straight?
If I install a trial version of Acronis, or Paragon's product or any other, then make an image, how will I know that I can completely restore and get the HPA back and boot successfully?
Clearly one way is just to try it. But what if it DOESN'T work? How can I then restore everything using R&R?
Many thanks!
I understand that many forum members like Acronis True Image, and Norton Ghost 2003 can also successfully backup the entire disk image using the -ib switch. I own and fairly well know how to use Ghost 2003, but I am looking for something a little "slicker" than Ghost (i.e. easilty scheduled backups, incremental backups). So here are my questions:
How can I test a backup program and make certain that it images the "unique IBM boot sector", the "HPA" and all those other out-of the-way goodies I am struggling to keep straight?
If I install a trial version of Acronis, or Paragon's product or any other, then make an image, how will I know that I can completely restore and get the HPA back and boot successfully?
Clearly one way is just to try it. But what if it DOESN'T work? How can I then restore everything using R&R?
Many thanks!