Kyocera wrote:There really is no such thing as relying on anything for the "safety" of your computer. I work with people every day who are told over and over to back up their data to their shared network drive so if something happens to their OS they won't lose their important data. Some do it some don't.armi wrote:I suggest to be very careful with ACRONIS if you plan to rely on it for the safety of your computer. Better seriously think the matter over
I've used Acronis for backup solutions and cloning it has worked fine so far for me. Other than the issues some are having with the newer version it's been reliable for what the mfr says it will do.
Hardware fails, software fails, it's generally not a good idea to have just one backup solution for any critical personal or job related information.
There are mitigating circumstances to every individuals situation, it's not fair to rubber stamp acronis as "hazardous" until there is way more than the few horror stories that I have read here.
I have been working 30 years with IBM, and I know what safety means. Now, everybody is free to accept to pay for a product which is not doing what it boasts to do, but I prefer one which works, and I think this not an unfair attitude. My message was just to make people aware of what can happen with ACRONIS. This does not prevent an amateur to try his luck.




