good deal on sl500?
Posted: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:33 am
http://outlet.lenovo.com/laptops/ca2746xd9.html - opinions please - is this a good deal? would be using it for the web, watching streaming videos and dvd's with my tired old eyes.
Est. 1995 - Copyright © 1995-2017 (see FAQ for details)
https://forum.thinkpads.com/
I wouldn't get it. The price is somewhat tempting, but the screen (low contrast and narrow viewing angles) would be terrible for watching videos and DVDs, especially for someone with "tired old eyes". Based on your intended use and what you said about your eyes, getting a good screen is of utmost importance, and it's worth paying a bit more for a good screen. All other specs are secondary. Most reviews on http://www.notebookcheck.net and http://www.notebookreview.com/ include helpful information on screen quality.retired wrote:is this a good deal? would be using it for the web, watching streaming videos and dvd's with my tired old eyes.
Check the review on the other site I recommended. It's very negative. And even "above average, though not exceptional" is not good enough for someone whose vision isn't great.retired wrote:notebook review.com says "The screen on the SL500 is above average, though not exceptional.", the resolution is low (1280x800).
Yes I noticed that about this SL500. But besides low res, you want something with high contrast and wide viewing angles. These review articles show photos of the LCDs viewed at different angles -- you want a screen whose colors don't change much at different angles. This SL500 is weak in these respects.retired wrote:the resolution is low (1280x800).
In general, Thinkpad screens are pretty lousy. I cannot recommend specific laptops because I seldom shop around for laptops any more (migrated to desktops two years ago). My suspicion is that consumer-oriented, multimedia laptops tend to have better screens. However, they also tend to have glossy screens, which some people like but others hate. You need to decide for yourself regarding glossy vs. matte.retired wrote:What would you suggest that would be better?