Is IBM going backwards in battery life?
-
Skysurfer
Is IBM going backwards in battery life?
I just bought a T43 w/ 14" screen to replace my killer T40. That T40 was an awesome machine. Nearly 5 hours of battery life doing hardcore financial modeling.
But this new T43, while wonderfully fast and loaded with nifty (read FUNCTIONAL) features, gets less than 3 hours of battery life.
What is the big drain over the T40? The ATI graphics card? The 7200 harddrive?
Is IBM going backwards in battery technology? Does anybody know what IBM/Lenovo has in mind for the nest T4x iteration? Consultants such as myself sometimes have to remain unplugged for some time and additional batteries are additional baggage.
Lawrence
But this new T43, while wonderfully fast and loaded with nifty (read FUNCTIONAL) features, gets less than 3 hours of battery life.
What is the big drain over the T40? The ATI graphics card? The 7200 harddrive?
Is IBM going backwards in battery technology? Does anybody know what IBM/Lenovo has in mind for the nest T4x iteration? Consultants such as myself sometimes have to remain unplugged for some time and additional batteries are additional baggage.
Lawrence
-
simscitizen
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 59
- Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2005 1:37 am
- Location: Stanford, CA
The battery in the T43 actually has 10% more WHr than the one in the T40 if I remember correctly, but I also get crappier battery life than i expected (I didn't own a T40, but this thing gets less battery life than my three-year old, and similarly-sized 1.2 GHz tualatin compaq n600c!). I put in a multibay battery now and get 4.5-5 hrs with undervolting, which is good enough for me but pretty sucky considering all the hype surrounding centrino.
It's Sonoma - the new version in the Centrino/Dothan Pentium M line that supports many new features, but unfortunately most of those features aren't implemented on the T43. But you pay the power price for them anyway. It's one of the reasons I think Sonoma is largely a dud.
You may be better served with a T42.
Here come the flames...
You may be better served with a T42.
Here come the flames...
Apathy is on the rise, but nobody seems to care.
Re: Is IBM going backwards in battery life?
Why did you get a T43 if the T40 was ok?Skysurfer wrote:I just bought a T43 w/ 14" screen to replace my killer T40. That T40 was an awesome machine. Nearly 5 hours of battery life doing hardcore financial modeling.
(2373-G3G) T40p/P-M 1.6GHz/1GB/60GB/14.1 SXGA/64MB ATI Fire GL 9000/CDRW-DVD/Cisco 802.11b/WinXP Pro SP2
(2373-8TG) T42/P-M 735/1GB/40GB/14.1 XGA/32MB ATI Radeon 7500/CDRW-DVD/Intel 802.11bg/WinXP Pro SP2
(2373-8TG) T42/P-M 735/1GB/40GB/14.1 XGA/32MB ATI Radeon 7500/CDRW-DVD/Intel 802.11bg/WinXP Pro SP2
battery & centrino generations
Hi,
Ther are different processors in the t4X:
t40/t41: pentium M Banias 130 nm ( max 1.6 Ghz, no 7xx but the 705)
T42: dothan 90 nm (7x5)
t43: dothan 90 nm, higher bus clock (7x0)
while the 90 nm types use less power if under full load they take substanially more power if in stand by or clocked down.
Clearly the faster bus speed and the pci -exp will consume power.
Another thing you might want to check: some t43 graphic units using parts of the RAM. If you ran big simulations with graphic demands this will lead to less available memory and increased swaping, thus hd usage and power consumption.
A RAM upgrade might therefore improve the situation... or get a t42, mine is running ~4,5 h on a 6 cell.
What might be interested: all the ( non ulv) Pentium M of one generation have the same max power recquirement in teh spec sheet, using a slower processor wil not improve battery life...
cheers
ralf
more info at the differnt pentium m might be at:
http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050119/index.html
Ther are different processors in the t4X:
t40/t41: pentium M Banias 130 nm ( max 1.6 Ghz, no 7xx but the 705)
T42: dothan 90 nm (7x5)
t43: dothan 90 nm, higher bus clock (7x0)
while the 90 nm types use less power if under full load they take substanially more power if in stand by or clocked down.
Clearly the faster bus speed and the pci -exp will consume power.
Another thing you might want to check: some t43 graphic units using parts of the RAM. If you ran big simulations with graphic demands this will lead to less available memory and increased swaping, thus hd usage and power consumption.
A RAM upgrade might therefore improve the situation... or get a t42, mine is running ~4,5 h on a 6 cell.
What might be interested: all the ( non ulv) Pentium M of one generation have the same max power recquirement in teh spec sheet, using a slower processor wil not improve battery life...
cheers
ralf
more info at the differnt pentium m might be at:
http://www.tomshardware.com/mobile/20050119/index.html
-
Skysurfer
Re: Is IBM going backwards in battery life?
Steve007 wrote:Why did you get a T43 if the T40 was ok?Skysurfer wrote:I just bought a T43 w/ 14" screen to replace my killer T40. That T40 was an awesome machine. Nearly 5 hours of battery life doing hardcore financial modeling.
For two reasons. First, my 3 yr warranty on the T40 was coming to an end in a few months. And second, right in the middle of a time critical project, my T40 suffered a liquid spill...which forced my hand on getting a new Thinkpad within 24 hrs.
FYI, the T40 will be repaired (fully covered under warranty) and auctioned on ebay. It looks like similarly equiped T40s go for around $800-$900. I will really miss that machine, as the T43s speed and power has now spoiled me.
Lawrence
-
Skysurfer
tehsoul wrote:you can always get a high capacity 9cell instead of the standard 6cell...
also, for most people, I don't think battery life is SUCH a big issue... there's usually powerplugs around here or there
Do you know what the average battery life of a 9-cell is on a T43 with a 14" screen?
Thanks,
Lawrence
-
Greg Gebhardt
- thinkpads.com customer

- Posts: 832
- Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 6:29 pm
- Location: Jacksonville, Florida
We all ask for more and more and it all uses power.
Get the 9cell extended battery and not worry about it for most days.
I can't complain about my T43 when I can use it most of the day on WiFi and not even look at the power meter. SUre there are ThinkPads that use less power but I would not give up mine for nothing.
Get the 9cell extended battery and not worry about it for most days.
I can't complain about my T43 when I can use it most of the day on WiFi and not even look at the power meter. SUre there are ThinkPads that use less power but I would not give up mine for nothing.
Greg Gebhardt
Jacksonville, Florida
Jacksonville, Florida
Re: battery & centrino generations
up to 5h on a 6-cell? I can hardly get 4hs on my T42...schmaud wrote:Hi,
A RAM upgrade might therefore improve the situation... or get a t42, mine is running ~4,5 h on a 6 cell.
ralf
can you get 5h having wireless off? Perhaps that's the catch.
anyways, I'm pretty happy with mine... if I needed, I would get a 9-cell.
Current: X200, X40
Past: T42, 600E
Past: T42, 600E
t42 batterie life
I was typing 4,5h, which meant 4+1/2.
at the beginning I had really more than 4:50, now it is quite a bit lower.
Strange was at the beginning that the system told me that i have more han the design capacity, but after ~65 cycles i am at ~90 percent of this number. By the way I have a sanyo pack.
I ussually have wlan of. But i noted that teh modem is taking quite some toll on the battery.
cheers
ralf
at the beginning I had really more than 4:50, now it is quite a bit lower.
Strange was at the beginning that the system told me that i have more han the design capacity, but after ~65 cycles i am at ~90 percent of this number. By the way I have a sanyo pack.
I ussually have wlan of. But i noted that teh modem is taking quite some toll on the battery.
cheers
ralf
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
X230 i5 3320m not going going at full speeds
by TheMagicT410 » Wed Jan 25, 2017 2:05 pm » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 3 Replies
- 804 Views
-
Last post by TheMagicT410
Wed Jan 25, 2017 6:40 pm
-
-
-
X201 - W7/SSD - SHORT BATTERY LIFE
by NicoMarcin » Sun Jun 25, 2017 7:01 am » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 11 Replies
- 319 Views
-
Last post by RealBlackStuff
Tue Jun 27, 2017 2:59 pm
-
-
-
Ultrabay battery prevents main battery from charging?
by ThorOfAsgard » Mon May 22, 2017 11:25 am » in ThinkPad T430/T530 and later Series - 8 Replies
- 276 Views
-
Last post by Thinkpad4by3
Mon May 22, 2017 8:50 pm
-
-
-
FOR SALE: IBM CL57 (8554) - Parts or Whole
by grit2112 » Wed Jan 04, 2017 9:26 am » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 2 Replies
- 264 Views
-
Last post by grit2112
Wed Jan 04, 2017 10:19 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: ginahoy and 2 guests






