Hard drive speed VS processor speed

T4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
studentuser
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:24 pm

Hard drive speed VS processor speed

#1 Post by studentuser » Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:28 pm

Hi,

I am unable to decide between 2 configurations of T43, would appreciate if I can get some help.

Option 1: T43 with 2 GHZ, and 5400 hard drive speed.
Option 2: T43 with 1.8 GHZ, and 7200 hard drive speed.

Performance wise which option is better?

Thanks,
A

jonnnny
Freshman Member
Posts: 104
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada
Contact:

#2 Post by jonnnny » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:18 pm

I would say the 7200 hd would be better. You'll really notice an increase in access time whereas with speedstep you'll probably be running at around 600mhz most of the time anyway (assuming you dont do a lot of intensive work all the time)
Jon

x41t : 1.5 : 1.5 : 40 : 12.1
t61p : 2.5 : 2.98 : 200 : 15.4

My favourite sites: Super blog! &
Best Photos of All-Time

2cool4u
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jun 28, 2004 12:37 pm
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Contact:

#3 Post by 2cool4u » Mon Aug 22, 2005 11:42 pm

but replacing the hard drive is cheaper than replacing the cpu, so I would go for the faster cpu and replace the hdd if you're not happy with it.

STS06
Sophomore Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:31 am

#4 Post by STS06 » Tue Aug 23, 2005 12:32 am

Right, but he/she will be paying for the CPU's extra speed here.

Depending on your work, you will either see no difference between the two CPUs or you may be a small, but noticable, advantage with the 2.1.

Peformance wise, the 2.0 Ghz is better. The hard drive speed will do little in helping your comp crunch numbers and etc. You probably wont be able to see the hard drive speed diff. until your hard drive is maxed out.

If the 1.8 Ghz is cheaper though, I'd stick with that. If you're askign this question, my bet is that you don't do extremely computer extensive stuff...which means tthere's be little difference between the 1.8 and 2.0, if any, for you.

RonS
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 1374
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 4:48 pm
Location: Portland, Oregon

#5 Post by RonS » Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:15 am

Performance-wise, the 1.8GHz with the 7200RPM will be better for most every-day work.
Apathy is on the rise, but nobody seems to care.

kaplanfx
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 317
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 12:01 am
Location: Oakland, CA

#6 Post by kaplanfx » Tue Aug 23, 2005 1:20 am

While I haven't used a 2Ghz Dothan, I must say that the 1.8 with a 7200RPM is really nice, I bought this system as a companion to my desktop (3Ghz HT northwood, 6600GT, 1Gig ram, etc. basically its pretty loaded) and I find that I actually prefer the laptop in most cases (except gaming) so if I could do it again I'd go for the 1.8 with the fast HD. Just my $0.02

-kaplanfx
-kaplanfx

2373M3U - 1.8 Ghz, 1.5GB Ram, 60GB 7200 HD, 14.1" SXGA+, Radeon 9600 64MB, Fingerprint Reader.

Steve007
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 379
Joined: Wed Sep 01, 2004 3:49 pm
Location: UK

Re: Hard drive speed VS processor speed

#7 Post by Steve007 » Tue Aug 23, 2005 3:32 am

studentuser wrote:Hi,

I am unable to decide between 2 configurations of T43, would appreciate if I can get some help.

Option 1: T43 with 2 GHZ, and 5400 hard drive speed.
Option 2: T43 with 1.8 GHZ, and 7200 hard drive speed.

Performance wise which option is better?

Thanks,
A
Go for Option 3, a T42 with a 7200 drive :wink:
(2373-G3G) T40p/P-M 1.6GHz/1GB/60GB/14.1 SXGA/64MB ATI Fire GL 9000/CDRW-DVD/Cisco 802.11b/WinXP Pro SP2

(2373-8TG) T42/P-M 735/1GB/40GB/14.1 XGA/32MB ATI Radeon 7500/CDRW-DVD/Intel 802.11bg/WinXP Pro SP2

studentuser
Posts: 2
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:24 pm

#8 Post by studentuser » Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:29 am

Thanks for all your responses. It will definitely help me make the right decision.

A

GeorgeP
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 8:59 pm

#9 Post by GeorgeP » Tue Aug 23, 2005 7:20 pm

If you:
- have a lot of memory (to preclude the need for a lot of virtual memory paging)
- use standby instead of booting; and
- are doing CPU-intensive tasks (image/video editing), the 2.0 5400 might be faster.

Most most workloads and 1GB or less, I'd say the 1.86 7600 would be faster.

btw I'd go for a 1.86 5400 for quietness and better battery life.

G

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#10 Post by hoya » Wed Aug 24, 2005 3:40 pm

studentuser: go for the newer T43 (2686M5U) with the 2.0 processor. these new T43's that were released in August are quieter, and you can always upgrade to a faster hdd down the road (the 7k60 has been replaced by the superior 7k100 anyway)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 42 guests