Thinking about returning my T42 for a T43...

T4x series specific matters only
Message
Author
Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

Thinking about returning my T42 for a T43...

#1 Post by Ninjak » Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:32 pm

Hey everyone,

I'm the guy that asked about X40 vs T42 a few weeks ago. Anyway I bought the T42 and it's pretty nice. One thing is getting on my nerves though, and that's the 1024x768 resolution. I've used it for two days straight at work, and I'm always wishing I had more screen space in my code editor. I should have got the higher resolution screen so I'm thinking about returning the T42 and getting a T43 with the better screen. It's only been a week so I can return it without any charge I think. Just a few questions though:

1) For anyone who has a 14" screen + 1400x1050 resolution monitor, do you find that in high res things are "too small" or "just right"???

2) I know the T43 has worse battery life than the T42. How bad of a hit will I take moving from a 1.6GHz T42 to a 2.0 GHz T43?

3) Does the 1400x1050 screen consume more power than the 1024x768 screen? If so then what kind of battery life hit are we talking about??

Thanks for the help.

Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

#2 Post by Ninjak » Tue Aug 23, 2005 9:39 pm

Ok heh I checked some old posts, I guess the T43 = laptop from h3ll so I'll probably stay away.

How about a T42 with 1400 x 1050 screen? I just priced one of those, not too much more than the one I have now. So now 2 questions left:

1) For anyone who has a 14" screen + 1400x1050 resolution monitor, do you find that in high res things are "too small" or "just right"???

2) Does the 1400x1050 screen consume more power than the 1024x768 screen? If so then what kind of battery life hit are we talking about??

Thanks a lot ppl, this forum rocks.

Pren
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 7:09 pm
Location: Plymouth, MN USA

#3 Post by Pren » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:38 pm

I have 14" 1400 X 1500 and while the text is a little small for my old eyes, a little playing with the settings and font sizes and I am pretty happy with it. Microsoft also has a little TT Font untility that makes the modified fonts somewhat sharper and easier to read. There is a link around here somewhere.

What I have found is that it is a very personal matter with regards to screen resolution. I would suggest you head to a Computer Store and view some laptops at different resolutions to get a feel for what is right for you .

Good Luck


Pren
_________________
(1) IBM T-42P 2373KTU, 2.0Ghz, 1G, ATI FireGLT2 128MB.

(2) IBM T-42 2379DXU 1.7Ghz, 512MB , ATI Mobility Radeon 9600 64MB

STS06
Sophomore Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:31 am

#4 Post by STS06 » Tue Aug 23, 2005 10:48 pm

I have a T42, 15" 1400x1050 resolution screen. Its quite nice actually. It was originally (guess in some ways still is) smaller text and etc. than I am used to but its great..easy to read (i have 20/20 vision) and quite a bit of space which I'm liking. In all, its a good investment. The T42 I have (2373N3U) is performing quite great right now. Personally, there wasn't enough reason to buy the T43 over the T42 which I see as a proven technology. I'm simply amazed with this comp...love it. Good luck!

Wholesomer
Freshman Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 6:11 pm

#5 Post by Wholesomer » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:00 pm

Ninjak wrote:Ok heh I checked some old posts, I guess the T43 = laptop from h3ll so I'll probably stay away.
I don't really know how many T-43 series has been sold so far, but the complaint about them are just a handful. You can't even get one right a way, you have to wait for weeks or months because they are still in high demand. You can very much count how many people having the problems with them in this forum. AFAIK, people who are happy about them a less likely to post about it. People usually post whenever they have a problem. So judge for yourself and keep in mind that the majority of happy T-43 Users out there will out weight the negative you have read so far.
T43 2668-75U: 2GHz, 14.1" SXGA, 2GB RAM, 64MB ATI x300, DVD Recordable, IBM 11a/b/g Wi-Fi Wireless II, Bluetooth, Fingerprint Reader.

Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

#6 Post by Ninjak » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:08 pm

Wholesomer wrote:
Ninjak wrote:Ok heh I checked some old posts, I guess the T43 = laptop from h3ll so I'll probably stay away.
I don't really know how many T-43 series has been sold so far, but the complaint about them are just a handful. You can't even get one right a way, you have to wait for weeks or months because they are still in high demand. You can very much count how many people having the problems with them in this forum. AFAIK, people who are happy about them a less likely to post about it. People usually post whenever they have a problem. So judge for yourself and keep in mind that the majority of happy T-43 Users out there will out weight the negative you have read so far.
I hear what you're saying. But the T43 has worse battery life than the T42 right?? And 100% of users have that loud fan right??? Maybe I misread, please reply back. I can get a sweet deal on a T43 so that's what I'd prefer if there are really no issues.

Wholesomer
Freshman Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2005 6:11 pm

#7 Post by Wholesomer » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:14 pm

The T-43 series come with a new battery which has 10% more capacity to make up for the higher demand; therefore, it's a wash comparing them with the T-42's.

The fan noise? to each his own I guess. My fan noise is no differ than the fan noise on my friend's T42. Most of the problems you have read are about the fan noise, and you will probably notice by now that they came from a handful of Users. Mean while, the Majority of T-43 Users out there are happy with their TP's.
T43 2668-75U: 2GHz, 14.1" SXGA, 2GB RAM, 64MB ATI x300, DVD Recordable, IBM 11a/b/g Wi-Fi Wireless II, Bluetooth, Fingerprint Reader.

Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

#8 Post by Ninjak » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:19 pm

Wholesomer wrote:The T-43 series come with a new battery which has 10% more capacity to make up for the higher demand; therefore, it's a wash comparing them with the T-42's.

The fan noise? to each his own I guess. My fan noise is no differ than the fan noise on my friend's T42. Most of the problems you have read are about the fan noise, and you will probably notice by now that they came from a handful of Users. Mean while, the Majority of T-43 Users out there are happy with their TP's.
Ok thanks for the comments, I'll have to look at the T43 closer. There's a great deal for a 2GHz T43 on EPP.

aamsel
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 958
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Austin, Texas

#9 Post by aamsel » Tue Aug 23, 2005 11:55 pm

I agree.

Although my current choice would still be a T42, I have not found the fan noise to be excessive on the T43.

There will always be complaints and gripes about any product. You have to weigh the pros and cons and make the best decision you can with the information that is available to you.

Andrew
Austin, TX

Wholesomer wrote:The T-43 series come with a new battery which has 10% more capacity to make up for the higher demand; therefore, it's a wash comparing them with the T-42's.

The fan noise? to each his own I guess. My fan noise is no differ than the fan noise on my friend's T42. Most of the problems you have read are about the fan noise, and you will probably notice by now that they came from a handful of Users. Mean while, the Majority of T-43 Users out there are happy with their TP's.

ddutta
Sophomore Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:28 pm

#10 Post by ddutta » Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:05 am

The fan noise also depends on the CPU load. Most of the time, your T42 CPU is probably runinng at 600Mhz! I have a T42 thats very quiet in Windows, but if I dont turn on the dynamic scaling in linux, the fan always makes an audible hum and blows warm air due to the 1600Mhz speed. My colleague at work bought a X32 and the fan seems to be on constantly.

My guess is that if you try to most laptops at their normal speeds, you will hear some fan noise especially with thin and light models. Of course if you take a huge dell, its a different issue: the huuuge body probably has several openings for air circulation.

Regarding your high res screen: I have had some similar doubts last month when I compared my XGA T42 with another SXGA models. The XGA seemed to have a better brightnessa nd the fonts seemed a little small. But the real estate is invaluable as it gives you an option to view more useless windows which dont need constant attention etc. I will probably go for a SXGA when I get another thinkpad (provided Lenovo doesnt sell Dell-ish models then!).

aamsel
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 958
Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 12:19 am
Location: Austin, Texas

#11 Post by aamsel » Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:14 am

Also, there are so many more pixels with the SXGA+ screen that the text looks so much better. Like it is smooth, instead of being made "out of dots" (which, of course, it is.) I am someone that has eyes better suited for the larger XGA fonts, but I make do with SXGA+ just because it looks so much better.

Andrew
Austin, TX

ddutta wrote:...Regarding your high res screen: I have had some similar doubts last month when I compared my XGA T42 with another SXGA models. The XGA seemed to have a better brightnessa nd the fonts seemed a little small. But the real estate is invaluable as it gives you an option to view more useless windows which dont need constant attention etc. I will probably go for a SXGA when I get another thinkpad (provided Lenovo doesnt sell Dell-ish models then!).

syhead
Sophomore Member
Posts: 140
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 12:23 am
Location: Goiânia, Brazil

#12 Post by syhead » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:03 am

e-x-a-c-t-l-y

by the way: do you guys expect a big fall in LCD prices until december? I'm thinking about getting a 19 or 20" TFT LCD screen, but the high-res ones (1600x1200) are a little pricey right now...

aamsel wrote:Also, there are so many more pixels with the SXGA+ screen that the text looks so much better. Like it is smooth, instead of being made "out of dots" (which, of course, it is.) I am someone that has eyes better suited for the larger XGA fonts, but I make do with SXGA+ just because it looks so much better.

Andrew
Austin, TX

ddutta wrote:...Regarding your high res screen: I have had some similar doubts last month when I compared my XGA T42 with another SXGA models. The XGA seemed to have a better brightnessa nd the fonts seemed a little small. But the real estate is invaluable as it gives you an option to view more useless windows which dont need constant attention etc. I will probably go for a SXGA when I get another thinkpad (provided Lenovo doesnt sell Dell-ish models then!).
Current: X200, X40
Past: T42, 600E

Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

#13 Post by Ninjak » Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:27 am

Thanks for the comments everyone, I've narrowed the choice down to two.

T43 with 1400x1050, x300 Radeon, 2GHz processor OR

T42 with 1400x1050, Radeon 7600, 1.7GHz processor

Price difference is about $300 more for the T43. But the T43 comes with 3 year warranty vs 1 for the T42 and a bigger hard disk.

Comments?? Can the Radeon 7600 handle the 1400x1050 screen okay?

chipsicle
Posts: 9
Joined: Thu Aug 18, 2005 3:44 pm

#14 Post by chipsicle » Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:39 am

I am in the same boat. I think i have finally made up my mind to get the t43. I think the better graphics, faster processor, and the additional warranty is worth the 300.00.

pphilipko
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 631
Joined: Sat May 22, 2004 10:32 am
Location: Philadelphia

#15 Post by pphilipko » Wed Aug 24, 2005 10:50 am

Ninjak wrote:Thanks for the comments everyone, I've narrowed the choice down to two.

T43 with 1400x1050, x300 Radeon, 2GHz processor OR

T42 with 1400x1050, Radeon 7600, 1.7GHz processor

Price difference is about $300 more for the T43. But the T43 comes with 3 year warranty vs 1 for the T42 and a bigger hard disk.

Comments?? Can the Radeon 7600 handle the 1400x1050 screen okay?
I would get the T43. An I think you're mentioning the Radeon 7500. The X300 is far superior.
Also, a $300 price difference with an upgraded graphics processor, a .3 difference in processor speed, and the extra 2 years of warranty are WORTH it, in my opinion.

EDIT: Oops, sorry chipsicle.
Phil
IBM X40, 2371-AV0
Lenovo T61, 6458-AB1
En route: X61t

dvorak
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:22 am
Location: Estonia

#16 Post by dvorak » Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:26 am

I think you meant 9600, I doubt they were offering one with 7500 to you, and AFAIK there are no R7500 with SXGA+ screens anyways, so it must be 9600.

The 9600 and X300 are more or less the same thing.

And an SXGA+ resolution with a 14.1" screen is definitely not too small, even with my awful -4 or worse eyes, I would even love if it would be UXGA :)

And regarding your dilemma, I'd take the T43, seems more bang for... dollar :)
Written behind a T42, 2373-9UG.
1.8GHz CPU, 1GB RAM, 80GB HDD, ATI-MR9600 64MB GPU, SXGA+ LCD, a/b/g WiFi, CD-RW/DVD

mysbca
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 7:49 pm
Location: SF, CA

#17 Post by mysbca » Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:02 pm

dvorak wrote:I think you meant 9600, I doubt they were offering one with 7500 to you, and AFAIK there are no R7500 with SXGA+ screens anyways, so it must be 9600.
Yes, there are SXGA+ with Radeon 7500, see 2373KFU, 2378R5U and 2379R5U.

Have you checked out one of the forum favorites, 2373M3U?
T42 - 1.8GHz, Radeon 9600, 14" SXGA+, 512MB RAM, 7200rpm 60GB HD, bluetooth, fingerprint reader, 3 year warranty. It recently had a $50 price drop.

dvorak
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 337
Joined: Wed Jan 26, 2005 11:22 am
Location: Estonia

#18 Post by dvorak » Wed Aug 24, 2005 12:14 pm

Well, there's not much difference in between a 1.8GHz T42 and 2.0GHz T43 in general (I mean performance wise), so it'll simply come down to money in the end.
T42's with a 3 year warranty (such as the M3U) should be rather cheap now.
mysbca wrote:Yes, there are SXGA+ with Radeon 7500, see 2373KFU, 2378R5U and 2379R5U.
Learning something every day, thanks :)
Written behind a T42, 2373-9UG.
1.8GHz CPU, 1GB RAM, 80GB HDD, ATI-MR9600 64MB GPU, SXGA+ LCD, a/b/g WiFi, CD-RW/DVD

ddutta
Sophomore Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:28 pm

#19 Post by ddutta » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:07 pm

The T42s are more expensive in general, Even the EPP prices are more than T43s with better specs.

dokein
Freshman Member
Posts: 65
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 2:50 pm
Location: Seattle

#20 Post by dokein » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:22 pm

ddutta wrote:The T42s are more expensive in general, Even the EPP prices are more than T43s with better specs.
Why is that?
IBM T42P 2373-KUU: Pentium-M 755 2.0Ghz | 14.1" SXGA+ TFT active matrix
128mb ATI Mobility FireGL T2 | 1GB PC2700 ram | 60GB 7200RPM

mysbca
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 420
Joined: Tue Jun 01, 2004 7:49 pm
Location: SF, CA

#21 Post by mysbca » Wed Aug 24, 2005 1:44 pm

ddutta wrote:The T42s are more expensive in general, Even the EPP prices are more than T43s with better specs.
But less problems, :) , less fan noise and no 2010 error if you change to non-sanctioned harddrives.
ddutta wrote:Why is that?
I don't know, but I would guess volume and newer cheaper components. IBM doesn't seem to discount their older models that much, they just bring the newer models out at a lower price point.

nrj45
Sophomore Member
Posts: 212
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:33 pm
Location: switzerland

#22 Post by nrj45 » Wed Aug 24, 2005 2:32 pm

I have max 4h30 with my t43p.
1400x1050 is just fine on a 14''
17.06.05:
t43p (2668G4G), PM750, 2Go dual, 1032GAX (100gb/5k/16mb) 2010 error msg, SXGA+ 14.1", V3200, DVD-RW, GBeth, Intel abg, bt, 9 cells, XPPro/Ubuntu, Fingerprint,
800MHz-0.7Vcore, LCD min -> 13Watts

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#23 Post by hoya » Wed Aug 24, 2005 4:12 pm

I would go for the T43 2686M5U - it's one of the newer August T43's so it should be quieter (I certainly hope so considering I have one on order), and you get the 2.0 processor, fingerprint reader, DVD burner, etc.

I've also read some postings that more buyers are getting Hydis panels on the T43 14.1" SXGA+ models, which seems brighter and better overall.

as for 1400 x 1050 on a 14.1", it should be fine if you adjust the font sizes in windows. also, firefox does a nice job of scaling fonts (much better than IE), and you can use the Ctrl+ combination to increase the size of the fonts.

STS06
Sophomore Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:31 am

#24 Post by STS06 » Wed Aug 24, 2005 7:28 pm

I say stick with a T42...get the newer models with a SXGA screen and you won't be dissapointed! :D
T42 (2373N3U): 1.8 Ghz, 1.5 GB DDR, ATI Radeon 9600, 60 GB 7200 rpm HD, 15" SXGA (1400x1050) screen, CD-RW/DVD-ROM (combo), Bluetooth, Fingerprint Reader.

ddutta
Sophomore Member
Posts: 202
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2005 7:28 pm

#25 Post by ddutta » Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:02 pm

If I order a CTO model 2687E9U (1.86) or 2687NEU, will they be quiet. I dont know when these were released.

Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

#26 Post by Ninjak » Wed Aug 24, 2005 9:42 pm

How about 266876U??

ThinkPad T43 266876U
Customize
266876U $1,399.00 1 $1,399.00
Processor: Intel Pentium M Processor 760 (2GHz 2MB L2 Cache 533MHz FSB ) (Standard) 1
Operating system: Microsoft Windows XP Professional (Standard) 1
Display type: 14.1 inch SXGA+ (1400x1050) TFT Display (Standard) 1
Memory: ThinkPad 512MB PC2-4200 CL4 DDR2 SDRAM SODIMM (Standard) 1
Hard drive: 80GB 5400rpm EIDE ATA (Standard) 1
Optical device: ThinkPad 24X/24X/24X/8X Max CD-RW/DVD-ROM Combo V Ultrabay Slim Drive (Standard) 1
Integrated communication: Integrated Gigabit Ethernet and 56K V.92 designed modem (Standard) 1
Integrated WiFi wireless LAN: Bluetooth Wireless (Standard) 1
Battery: 6 Cell Lithium Ion Battery (Standard) 1



Is this one of the newer ones??

STS06
Sophomore Member
Posts: 239
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 9:31 am

#27 Post by STS06 » Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:29 pm

No to my knowledge the 266876U would be referred as an older model. The newer models are the ones released in August of this year.
Last edited by STS06 on Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
T42 (2373N3U): 1.8 Ghz, 1.5 GB DDR, ATI Radeon 9600, 60 GB 7200 rpm HD, 15" SXGA (1400x1050) screen, CD-RW/DVD-ROM (combo), Bluetooth, Fingerprint Reader.

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#28 Post by hoya » Thu Aug 25, 2005 4:51 pm

2686M5U is one of the new August models and is reasonably priced at $1829 before any discounts (EPP price is around $1380)

check the TABOOK for some other new models:
http://www5.pc.ibm.com/us/me.nsf/Lenovo ... cntry=US-L

bbkat
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 10:49 am

#29 Post by bbkat » Thu Aug 25, 2005 7:29 pm

hoya wrote:2686M5U is one of the new August models and is reasonably priced at $1829 before any discounts (EPP price is around $1380)
Have you actually seen these on the EPP site or is that just an estimate? I've been watching for new models and haven't seen any yet.

Ninjak
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2005 9:55 am

#30 Post by Ninjak » Thu Aug 25, 2005 9:20 pm

bbkat wrote:
hoya wrote:2686M5U is one of the new August models and is reasonably priced at $1829 before any discounts (EPP price is around $1380)
Have you actually seen these on the EPP site or is that just an estimate? I've been watching for new models and haven't seen any yet.
Werd, I don't see that one on EPP. Is there a hidden link or something?

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests