Performance diff of 5400 vs. 7200rpm

T4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
kuma
Freshman Member
Posts: 121
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 8:14 pm
Location: Minnesota

Performance diff of 5400 vs. 7200rpm

#1 Post by kuma » Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:02 am

What is the performance difference btn the 80 gig 5400rpm and the 60 gig 7200rpm? I'm thinking that I want the extra 20 gigs of memory for music and files. Is there going to be a big difference? I don't need the fastest machine ever but don't want something slow either.
Thanks.

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#2 Post by jdhurst » Wed Nov 02, 2005 10:09 am

In my experience the 80Gb 5400 rpm drive works very well and adequately fast. I have the 60Gb 7200 rpm drive in my T41 and I like it, but if space is more important, I think you will be happy with the 80Gb drive. ... JD Hurst

KrazieF00
Posts: 9
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 4:05 pm

#3 Post by KrazieF00 » Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:28 pm

not a huge difference, but it is noticable. Remember people have been and still are using 5400RPM drives in their desktops

kyrotech
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 293
Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 1:37 pm
Location: PTY, PA
Contact:

#4 Post by kyrotech » Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:49 pm

I have the 80 GB 5400 RPM model and works very fast

I once used a T42 with the 60 7200 RPM drive and didnt noticed that night and day difference, and that extra 20 GB are very important :roll:
IBM ThinkPad T42 CTU # Pentium M 1.8 Ghz Dothan # Mobility 9600 64 MB @375/240 # Hynix 1024 MB PC2700 RAM #
Fujitsu 80 GB 5400 RPM # LG CDRW/DVD Combo Drive # Intel Wireless b/g mPCI # TFT 14.1 XGA Display # WinXP Pro SP2 Catalyst 7.7

DIGITALgimpus
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2005 1:01 pm

#5 Post by DIGITALgimpus » Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:06 pm

it depends what you do.

If your someone like me who does lots of i/o and reads/writes large sums of files (compiles large software). You appreciate the extra RPM's. Makes things much faster.

But for many, it's not really going to give much of a boost.
T43 (2687-DUU) - 1.86GHz, 1.5GB RAM, 100GB 5400 (non IBM-firmware Hitachi 5k100) HD, Fingerprint Scanner, 802.11abg/Bluetooth, ATI x300

esquire
Freshman Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Mon May 31, 2004 9:11 am
Location: Tanzania

#6 Post by esquire » Thu Nov 03, 2005 3:49 am

DIGITALgimpus wrote:it depends what you do.

If your someone like me who does lots of i/o and reads/writes large sums of files (compiles large software). You appreciate the extra RPM's. Makes things much faster.

But for many, it's not really going to give much of a boost.

What this guy said. I have the 60gig 7200 and frankly, couldn't go back to a slower drive. So, go for it, you have nothing to lose.
IBM Thinkpad T42 DXU

NeoteriX
Freshman Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Brighton, MA

#7 Post by NeoteriX » Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:08 am

This recent article over @ notebook reivews might be helpful for you:
http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=2603

jjfcpa
Sophomore Member
Posts: 153
Joined: Fri May 28, 2004 6:56 am

#8 Post by jjfcpa » Thu Nov 03, 2005 9:14 am

I have a 2668-P2U with the 100 gig 7200 rpm drive and I previously was using a T43 with the 80 gig 5400 rpm drive. Being naturally impatient, I notice things like long boot times and delays when loading applications.

All I can say is I will never settle for anything but a 7200 rpm drive. The difference is HUGE in my estimation. Boot times are cut down dramatically and both laptops are configured precisely the same. Application loading is almost instantaneous. Saying it's "noticeable" is putting it mildly in my opinion.

I waivered when spending in excess of $ 3300 for this particular TP, but now I'm smiling everytime I turn it on.

It also appears that Lenovo has tightened up the keyboard because it seems even more precise than it used to be. I'm a touch typist and the keyboard is why I use a TP. I know it's new, but my T43 was only a few months old and once again, the difference is more than noticeable. I like it much better.
JJF
T61 - 7664-17U - 2.0 ghz. Santa Rosa, 2 gig RAM, 160 gig 5400 RPM, WSXGA+ (1440 x 900)

T60 - 2007-76U - 2.0 Core Duo, 1 gig RAM, 7200 rpm, SXGA+ (1400 x 1050)

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests