128MB ATI FireGL V3200 vs. 64MB ATI Radeon X300 ?

T4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
birdman-c
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Apr 24, 2006 6:29 pm

128MB ATI FireGL V3200 vs. 64MB ATI Radeon X300 ?

#1 Post by birdman-c » Tue Apr 25, 2006 11:30 am

128MB ATI FireGL V3200 vs. 64MB ATI Radeon X300

I don't know too much about video cards... what in your opinion is the better all around card?

I was thinking of going to the x300 with 64MB because I assume it is a less powerful card - and my current t43p has major heat issues.

What are the pros and cons?

Thanks!

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6659
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#2 Post by dr_st » Tue Apr 25, 2006 4:40 pm

The FireGL is more powerful, but it may indeed generate more heat when running at its full capacity. With that said, it still shouldn't be a problem. Heat issues arise on select units, they do not necessarily plague entire model lines.

dash7540
Freshman Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: Wichita, Kansas

#3 Post by dash7540 » Tue Apr 25, 2006 8:36 pm

The FireGL.

It's actually based on the X600, and the X600 is more powerful than the X300...

Of course this all depends upon your needs; both of these are pretty overkill if you're only using it for web/office/general productivity apps, the integrated GMA900 is sufficient in my opinion. However, if you're going to use CAD then the FireGL is a must-have.

As for the heat issue, don't worry about it too much. I'm sure the 'Pad you get is designed/tweaked to tolerate the heat.
T42 (2378-FVU)
600E
755CE

nimativ
Posts: 20
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 6:57 am

#4 Post by nimativ » Wed Apr 26, 2006 5:48 am

unless the firegl has changed it's an old agp card based on the radeon 9600.
the x300 (pci) performs slighltly better than a 9600 with equal ram.
and the x300 runs also a little hotter.

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6659
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#5 Post by dr_st » Wed Apr 26, 2006 6:16 am

nimativ wrote:unless the firegl has changed it's an old agp card based on the radeon 9600.
It has. It's the FireGL V3200, not the FireGL T2.
nimativ wrote:the x300 (pci) performs slighltly better than a 9600 with equal ram.
Not always. Sometimes the 9600 edges ahead.

Esben
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

#6 Post by Esben » Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:55 am

The topic of FireGL vs X300 vs R9600 has been beaten to death. Please do a search for more information.
You will find technical information and everything you need to know, or want to ask.
Lenovo Thinkpad X230,
i5-3320M | 8 GB DDR3-1600 | 256 GB Crucial M4 | 12.5" IPS | Windows 8 Pro

mybellyisempty
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 432
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2005 7:34 pm
Location: Springfield, Illinois

#7 Post by mybellyisempty » Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:20 pm

be careful with the FireGL and any OGL games...my FireGL T2 on the T41P and T42P I had never allowed Doom3, Quake 3, or Tribes 2 to work....for DX games it was fine though.
DS1100(work-built): i7 2700K; 16GB; 64GB SSD & 2x 500GB 7200; 970; U2410
Thinkpad Yoga 260: i5 6200u; 16GB; 256GB SSD; 12.5" 1080p
NUC: I5-4250; 12GB; 256GB SSD & 1TB 5400

Bgradid
Sophomore Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:33 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

#8 Post by Bgradid » Thu Apr 27, 2006 3:38 pm

mybellyisempty wrote:be careful with the FireGL and any OGL games...my FireGL T2 on the T41P and T42P I had never allowed Doom3, Quake 3, or Tribes 2 to work....for DX games it was fine though.
Odd.. I just had a good game of quake 3 yesterday.. and that was with the ibm drivers too
T42p 14" SXGA+/1.8/2gB/60gB-7200rpm
T23 14" SXGA+/1ghz/512/40gB
560,560x,560z

dash7540
Freshman Member
Posts: 97
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2004 5:47 pm
Location: Wichita, Kansas

#9 Post by dash7540 » Thu Apr 27, 2006 6:58 pm

Sorry, kind of off topic, but I couldn't help noticing Esben's sig :lol:

Wow at 450/232 how stable does your Radeon run?? I really want to OC mine, but I'm scared to go that high. Also, how much of a performance boost do you get from that as opposed to stock speeds (320/210 I believe.) And finally, what about the heat issue - is any kind of extra cooling required?
T42 (2378-FVU)
600E
755CE

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests