Dynamic switching using the NHC tool recommended?

T4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
hamoudi
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:42 pm
Location: Germany

Dynamic switching using the NHC tool recommended?

#1 Post by hamoudi » Thu Jun 15, 2006 5:40 pm

hi guys...its me again :oops:

im using the NHC now on my T42 and id like to ask if the dynamic switching is good or not for the CPU itself?? i thought to myself that switching frequencies that fast and that often must be pretty much damaging for the CPU.

anyone with infos? id be thankfull....

Bgradid
Sophomore Member
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 3:33 am
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

#2 Post by Bgradid » Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:57 pm

If anything it'd be good for it i imagine. I don't think it'd do any harm, the CPU itself wouldn't get any strain from switching frequencies, and the power regulation systems in a laptop are built for quick switching between voltages anyway, and I imagine keeping them lower 95% of the time as dynamic would would be of benefit to the lifetime of the hardware anyway.

So in short: don't worry about it.
T42p 14" SXGA+/1.8/2gB/60gB-7200rpm
T23 14" SXGA+/1ghz/512/40gB
560,560x,560z

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#3 Post by christopher_wolf » Thu Jun 15, 2006 7:04 pm

At any regulation level, the Intel chipsets do their own frequency switching; the NHC one is not much different from the adaptive mode in the Power Manager or in Windows. It doesn't harm the CPU at all. :)
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

hamoudi
Posts: 33
Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 4:42 pm
Location: Germany

#4 Post by hamoudi » Fri Jun 16, 2006 3:30 am

hi guys,
thanks for ur help. but id like to mention that in windows i guess dynamic switching is only between min and max right? correct me if im wrong.
what about having all these 6x,8x,10x....17x steps in a dynamic switch?? is it also good or would u recommend switching between min. and max. only?

id be thankfull for any tips, advices ,new infos u bring in concerning dynamic switching under NHC

PS: using dynamic switching i spared my laptop 7 degrees difference :lol: ! its pretty much awesome. so i really need to know more about it.....


thanks

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#5 Post by christopher_wolf » Fri Jun 16, 2006 4:25 am

hamoudi wrote:hi guys,
thanks for ur help. but id like to mention that in windows i guess dynamic switching is only between min and max right? correct me if im wrong.
what about having all these 6x,8x,10x....17x steps in a dynamic switch?? is it also good or would u recommend switching between min. and max. only?

id be thankfull for any tips, advices ,new infos u bring in concerning dynamic switching under NHC

PS: using dynamic switching i spared my laptop 7 degrees difference :lol: ! its pretty much awesome. so i really need to know more about it.....


thanks
That is perfectly fine, it is a selling and big operating point of the Intel chipset in your Thinkpad; nothing bad can happen if you let the system and the CPU decide what clock to run at. :)
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T4x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests