christopher_wolf wrote:coreman wrote:
My company used to use TP exclusively but due to constant MOBO or LCD failures went to another brand for a while...however they returned to IBM because everyone complained about the keyboards on the other brand.
Constant failure? Or was it constant ignorance by the users, and possibly some of the IT staff, as how one goes about handling mobile systems and how to treat them, regardless of maker, for optimal lifetime? I think you will find it is the latter as that is a fairly big problem for just about any large corporation or institution.
Where to begin??? I see after 3,000 years the messenger is still getting shot!
Let me start with that I design a lot of components into mobile products, from iPods to Thinkpads so I have a pretty good idea of the complexity of the finished products and the expectations of the companies that make them.
As an example, all mobile phones and the new small hard drives, 2.5" and smaller, all have to pass a drop test from 1 m onto concrete before being approved for sale. This means that all components that go into mobile phones have to pass the same tests.
Why? Because people drop small objects like mobile phones all the time. Your phone is one tough cookie...but do that to a Thinkpad and it will likely be toast. It simply isn't designed to withstand such a test because it would be prohibitively expensive as well as make them a whole lot heavier.
Okay so why so many mobo, LCD replacements? From what I heard from the techs, it was mostly wear and tear problems, including the problem of flexing mobos by picking up by corner. So is this a user or design problem? Doesn't really matter, IBM decided the warranty repair costs were cheaper than designing a stiffer case for every TP when only "x"% are failing due to flexing.
And I'm sure that the replacement mobos are most likely refurbished boards that were fixed, tested and sent to the tech centers to be used for warranty repairs (could be why there seems to be a lot of repeat failures reported) but it keeps total costs down. As long as Lenovo repairs at their costs, most people aren't disturbed...just a little annoyed.
The heavier TP would also make it less attractive to Road Warriors so they may have a more rugged product but less desirable because of weight...a penalty that would be paid every day for most business users. Weight was certainly one of my prime considerations...
However I would never blame a user for picking it up by corner or by LCD panel, it is a natural motion and frankly, the TP should withstand that kind of stress since it is a known one.
An earlier poster asked me if the failure rates dropped when my company went to other brand...the answer is a resounding yes! But the units were bigger, stiffer, and keyboards really sucked...
Our vendor for TP lost so much business that he agreed to provide a few spare machines as loaners so when mobos failed, all the IT techs had to do was swap out the hard drive from the user and put into loaner machines while failed unit is off to tech center for repair. User is happy, company happy and vendor happy...the really good news is hard drive failures are very, very rare...
But this solution won't work for private owners, we have to wait for our machines to be repaired and that sucks also...so the best thing is to treat TPs with tender loving care and not manhandle them around. However if you do and it is in warranty, IBM/Lenovo warranty repairs (from my personal experience as well as others) is second to none..fast, efficient, and very easy to initiate.