My original setup was:
My new setup (similar principles but new hardware):Original HDD: Hitachi 60Gb 7200rpm w/ 2 NTFS partitions C:BOOT\ and D:DATA\
ExpressCard slot: a Lexar ExpressCard 4Gig dedicated to ReadyBoost
PCMCIA slot: a Viking Interworks 32Bit adaptor & an aData 32Gig Compactflash for on-board backups of D:DATA\
System RAM = 2Gig
32G C:\BOOT drive: Transcend 32Gb SSD 2.5" IDE MLC
48G D:\DATA drive: FileMate USB + PCI-e Express card 48GB SSD Retail
32G E:\BACKUP drive: Viking Interworks 32Bit PCMCIA adaptor & an aData 32Gig Compactflash for on-board backups
All drives are encrypted via TrueCrypt at the system level (so they're unusable if removed, unless a password is known). This has caused a performance hit that HD Tune scores illustrate (like before based on 10 tests each:
DEVICE Avg X-fer rate
C:\BOOT 33.5mb/s
D:\DATA 105.2mb/s
E:\BACKUP 9.5mb/s <---CF drive
All previously mentioned tweaks are still in place (turn off Superfetch/ReadyBoost/Indexing, relocate Chrome Cache, etc). I even moved the entire C:\Users folder to the faster D:\DATA drive since I rely heavily on IMAP-based Outlook. That's now faster too. The CF card is clearly the weakest/slowest device, but that's only used by a scheduled background SyncToy job, so it doesn't impact overall usage. The Windows Experience Index remains at 3.7 like before, but it's the graphics capability holding it down. The hard-drive component of the test is up to 5.9. Overall, boot-up and app-starts are shorter, battery life is longer, system is quieter. If there was some way to boot this machine from the ExpressCard34 slot, it'd be a screamer.
In the final analysis, i'm satisfied with the increased responsive. It's been a worthwhile learning experience for $280 (including tax and shipping).
Happy to answer any other questions you might have.



