Page 1 of 1

Thinkpad SL500 Pics and Discussion

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 7:26 am
by dr_st
The Thinkpad SL series is often belittled around these forums, and some don't even consider it a true Thinkpad. Really, it definitely lacks some of the features expected on Thinkpads (docking station, anyone?) but it does have some other common Thinkpad feature. All in all, I would rate it much closer to a "true" Thinkpad than to the value series.

I visited a friend who has a Thinkpad SL500 2746-P3G, and took some pictures. Here they are. You can click them all for larger versions.

While I didn't spend enough time with the machine to form a real opinion, my first impressions were rather positive. I will talk about them a bit while describing the photos.

Image
Starting from the outside of the machine - top lid with the black glossy finish. Looks and feels very different from other Thinkpads, but quite nice. Definitely a fingerprint/smudge magnet, but most of the time they are not as obvious as with this flash photo.

Image
A close-up on the Thinkpad logo, where the red dot is actually a LED.

Image
With the lid open, a view of the 15.4" widescreen. The hinges are plastic, not steel, but feel solid enough. They don't allow the screen to be open a full 180 degrees, but only about 160-170, which is still wide enough for almost anything. On top you see the camera (no Thinklight). Overall the design of the inside of the lid is quite pleasant. I like it more than the recent T/R/X series - looks smooth and polished.

Image
The keyboard and touchpad area. Keyboard is very similar to a classic Thinkpad, with one major difference - it's six rows and not seven. Which means that the Pgup/Pgdn buttons are relocated next to the arrows, where the browser buttons are on a normal Thinkpad, the other 4 navigation keys are arranged in a row, and PrtSc/SysRq/Break/ScrLk are now accessed using Fn key combinations. This is not as good in my book, and I don't understand what the reason for ditching the standard layout is. Surely there was more than enough room to accommodate the full 7 rows, and how much more expensive would it be anyways?
The keyboard itself is pretty solid, although some flex is present in certain areas, most notably the top right corner. Overall, it feels somewhere between the T6x keyboard and the T400/T500 keyboards.
The touchpad is nice and big, similar to the recent T series touchpads. I understand that SL400/SL500 use the higher quality Synaptics model, while SL300 uses Alps. Thinkpad purists will appreciate the red stripes on the trackpoint buttons.
Finally, the plastic around the keyboard and in the palmrest feels quite solid, nice and smooth. It is not the rugged texture of other Thinkpads, and so I imagine it is more prone to scratches.

Image
Left side of the keyboard, where the Thinkvantage, volume and mute buttons reside.

Image
Top right corner of the keyboard, with the LED-lit power button, and some of the LED indicators. The speakers with the SL series are above the keyboard and not on the sides, as with recent T/R series.

Image
A view from the front, with the WiFi switch and some more LED indicators. These are visible when the lid is closed (most Thinkpads have them on the top of the lid). The front edge is angled, like on 15" T42/T60.

Image
Back-left edge of the machine with the battery and the VGA port. The power jack (not pictured) is on the back-right side. The battery itself is the standard T/R/Z/W/SL 6-cell battery, which is nice for compatibility. Notice how all the side edge is also angled. It is an interesting design, no doubt to make the laptop look sleek, but makes some ports harder to reach, since they have to reside inside groves, as will be evident from the following pictures.

Image
Back left - USB ports and an HDMI port - something that I would like to see on other Thinkpads. True some of them have DisplayPort, but it is not as ubiquitous and not as useful, especially since I understand that Lenovo has not implemented audio over DP.

Image
Front left - card reader and Firewire.

Image
Most of the functional stuff is on the right (sorry about the blur) - audio, 2xUSB, DVD recorder, modem/Ethernet.

Image
One final pic with the screen turned on. It is a regular matte WXGA TN panel, but the quality was a pleasant surprise to me. Here the screen is actually at its lowest brightness setting, and in these conditions it was still quite readable and the contrast was pretty good. At maximum brightness, the screen is too bright in most normal lighting conditions. I can imagine it will be even semi-useful working outside.

Overall, I find it a very nice laptop for the price.

Re: Thinkpad SL500 Pics and Discussion

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 8:57 am
by ZaZ
Nice Pics.

I wanted to buy a SL300 back when they had them for $500 in March, but they discontinued it before I could scrape the funds together. I heard they had nice LED screen and I wanted a smaller compliment to my 15" R60. I think the SLs are fine for what they are, but calling them a ThinkPad with all that implies doesn't seem right either.

Re: Thinkpad SL500 Pics and Discussion

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 11:10 am
by dr_st
My problem with SL300 was that they were only available with glossy screens for some reason.

I would probably consider a SL being as much a Thinkpad as the ultra-economy R5Xe/R6Xe models...

Re: Thinkpad SL500 Pics and Discussion

Posted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 1:50 pm
by ZaZ
I wanted something smaller. Though not my first choice, I don't mind a glossy screen. I heard the one on the SL300 was pretty nice. I'd have a X200 or something, but I'm not a big fan of the stick, which I know makes me a bit of an oddball around here.

Re: Thinkpad SL500 Pics and Discussion

Posted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 3:41 pm
by radiator
I have had an opportunity to work on it recently, and I must say I would not consider it as a true thinkpad either! Its quality stands out from the real ones. But let's not make a fuss of it, shall we?
As far as the machine is concerned it looks nice and the reviews on the net give a positive impressions about it.

Re: Thinkpad SL500 Pics and Discussion

Posted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 5:00 am
by dr_st
radiator wrote:I have had an opportunity to work on it recently, and I must say I would not consider it as a true thinkpad either! Its quality stands out from the real ones.
Could you, as a person who had some real work experience with the SL series, elaborate more on what aspects of it seemed of lesser quality to you? It's quite interesting to me, and I didn't have enough time with the SL500 in question to form my own opinion.