Page 1 of 1

T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Sun Apr 22, 2012 8:59 am
by arty_harvy
Post novobench results here for any T6Xx.
http://novabench.com/

Ill start it....

T61p 6457-B64

Verified NovaBench Score: 656
Intel Core2 Extreme X9000 2.80GHz running at 3200 MHz
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M GPU

8127 MB System RAM (Score: 150)
- RAM Speed: 2879 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 272)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 51211466
- Integer Operations/Second: 183679206
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 1034356

Graphics Tests (Score: 185)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 553

Hardware Tests (Score: 49)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 699 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 115 MB/s

Image

NOTE:
FX 570M was overclocked pretty high on nVidea 296.10 drivers
Ran the bench multiple times to get the Momentus XT to cache the software.

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:12 pm
by arty_harvy
No one.......?

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2012 9:02 pm
by wackyD
T61 7661-BF3 314
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 2.00GHz @ 1994 MHz
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family

3063 MB System RAM (Score: 92)
- RAM Speed: 2980 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 201)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50562192
- Integer Operations/Second: 115730264
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 668926

Graphics Tests (Score: 6)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 24

Hardware Tests (Score: 15)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 32 MB/s

Sadly, it was beaten by my X61
X61 7673-4NU 331
Microsoft Windows Vista Business
Intel Core2 Duo T7300 2.00GHz @ 2001 MHz
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 965 Express Chipset Family

4022 MB System RAM (Score: 109)
- RAM Speed: 3110 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 194)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50489636
- Integer Operations/Second: 113415566
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 613924

Graphics Tests (Score: 6)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 23

Hardware Tests (Score: 22)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 67 MB/s

But the T61 does beat the pants off (or at least tugs firmly at) my X60s
X60s 1703-VG6 258
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Intel Core2 L7400 1.50GHz @ 1496 MHz
Graphics Card: Mobile Intel(R) 945 Express Chipset Family

3063 MB System RAM (Score: 90)
- RAM Speed: 2586 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 154)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 41302558
- Integer Operations/Second: 85320716
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 497436

Graphics Tests (Score: 2)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 10

Hardware Tests (Score: 12)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 466 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 10 MB/s

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2012 4:10 pm
by Temetka
Verified NovaBench Score: 366


Test run on April 26, 2012
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional

Intel Intel Core2 Duo T7500 2.20GHz running at 2201 MHz

NVIDIA NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M GPU

4031 MB System RAM (Score: 108)
- RAM Speed: 2956 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 199)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50572104
- Integer Operations/Second: 117689604
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 637537

Graphics Tests (Score: 38)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 130

Hardware Tests (Score: 21)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 298 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 50 MB/s

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2012 12:14 am
by miro_gt
didn't bother closing some background programs eventhough I was advised to do so, but here's my first run

---

NovaBench Score: 401
4/27/2012 1:09:55 AM
Microsoft Windows XP Professional
Intel Core2 Duo T9500 2.60GHz @ 2593 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

3071 MB System RAM (Score: 93)
- RAM Speed: 3286 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 251)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 51049738
- Integer Operations/Second: 160238844
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 936779

Graphics Tests (Score: 48)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 160

Hardware Tests (Score: 9)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 12 MB/s

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 1:10 pm
by arty_harvy
Awesome guys. Keep them coming!!!

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:09 pm
by deadzoo
T61 7663-21U

3/27/2012 7:24:38 PM
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 2.50GHz @ 2501 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

4031 MB System RAM (Score: 110)
- RAM Speed: 3321 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 231)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50924300
- Integer Operations/Second: 144366004
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 806330

Graphics Tests (Score: 41)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 137

Hardware Tests (Score: 25)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 86 MB/s

I have a 128GB Samsung 830 SSD that I`ll install soon. I think the Hardware Test score will be a little better with a SSD, I`ll run Novabench again and post the results.

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Wed May 02, 2012 12:05 am
by deadzoo
I replaced my WD250GB 5400rpm drive with a 128GB Samsung 830 SSD and the score got worse not better! How can this be? The SSD boots Windows 7 up Eset NOD32,WiFi and all in nine seconds and Photoshop CS6 opens so fast your unable to read anything on the splash screen. The WD250 booted Windows on average in 50 seconds and on Photoshop CS6 splash screen I could read all of it including the names of every Adobe employee that is credited. :??:

Both benchmarks are posted below. Anybody know what is wrong with this picture? :?:

T61 7663-21U

WD250GB 5400rpm results:
3/27/2012 7:24:38 PM
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 2.50GHz @ 2501 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

4031 MB System RAM (Score: 110)
- RAM Speed: 3321 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 231)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50924300
- Integer Operations/Second: 144366004
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 806330

Graphics Tests (Score: 41)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 137

Hardware Tests (Score: 25)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 233 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 86 MB/s

===========================
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
===========================

128GB Samsung 830 results:
5/1/2012 9:16:32 PM
Microsoft Windows 7 Ultimate
Intel Core2 Duo T9300 2.50GHz @ 2501 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 140M

4031 MB System RAM (Score: 108)
- RAM Speed: 3050 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 230)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50923576
- Integer Operations/Second: 143085730
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 802636

Graphics Tests (Score: 24)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 85

Hardware Tests (Score: 18)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 119 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 94 MB/s

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 5:16 am
by kirpeknots
T61p 6460-8ZG

NovaBench Score: 443
Microsoft Windows 7 Professional
Intel Core2 Duo T7700 2.40GHz @ 2401 MHz
Graphics Card: NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M
HD1: Corsair 120Gb Force 3 SSD. Sandforce chipset (Primary)
HD2: Ultrabay adaptor with Hitachi 7K500 (500Gb, 7200rpm disk)


4031 MB System RAM (Score: 109)
- RAM Speed: 3230 MB/s

CPU Tests (Score: 227)
- Floating Point Operations/Second: 50894704
- Integer Operations/Second: 143057102
- MD5 Hashes Generated/Second: 772737

Graphics Tests (Score: 92)
- 3D Frames Per Second: 291

Hardware Tests (Score: 15)
- Primary Partition Capacity: 112 GB
- Drive Write Speed: 67 MB/s

This bench takes no account of HD read speed! The main advantage of an SSD is ignored.

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:02 am
by RealBlackStuff
There are lies, big lies and benchmark results...
All the above figures show an arbitrary value on an arbitrary scale that has little or no value.
What a waste of time!

Re: T6Xx NovaBench results

Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:03 pm
by arty_harvy
I replaced my WD250GB 5400rpm drive with a 128GB Samsung 830 SSD and the score got worse not better! How can this be? The SSD boots Windows 7 up Eset NOD32,WiFi and all in nine seconds and Photoshop CS6 opens so fast your unable to read anything on the splash screen. The WD250 booted Windows on average in 50 seconds and on Photoshop CS6 splash screen I could read all of it including the names of every Adobe employee that is credited.

Both benchmarks are posted below. Anybody know what is wrong with this picture?
The benchmark software take both drive performance, and capacity into account. So it is somewhat subjective.
There are lies, big lies and benchmark results...
All the above figures show an arbitrary value on an arbitrary scale that has little or no value.
What a waste of time!
Its not the best in the world, but it does give a generalized result.

OP edited. SEE NOTE AT BOTTOM