***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#1 Post by hoax32 » Sat Sep 29, 2012 10:12 pm

Hello TPFreaks!
Yesterday I was using my little free time and played some world of tanks on my Late Production (August 2008) T61 with a OCed nVidia GPU.
It has all the specs listed below my sig.
Suddenly i got a blue screen with the below stated error.....NO DUMP FILE.....

NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error
http://cdn-ak.f.st-hatena.com/images/fo ... 213015.jpg

I restarted and let the Lenovo Toolbox / PC-Doctor do it's job.
I checked RAM, HDD, CPU, VRAM and ALL the other stuff + I stressed the GPU for hours......it didn't happen again........it still bothers the crap out of me.
I did update my 496AGN drivers though cause i read in some forums that wifi cards can cause it.
Any ideas what can cause this?
Caould this be a bad GPU symptome?
(BTW i run Fan Control on MAX 24/7 and even under extreme 3 stressing for gours temps max at 79*C)

Any1 experienced this b4?
did it happen repeadetly or did it disappear?

TY
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

miro_gt
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#2 Post by miro_gt » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:27 pm

run memtest86+ to test your memory modules.

one is maybe going bad.
T61: 14.1" 1400x1050, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, nVidia 140m @ 600/925 MHz, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 5300agn, FP, BT, 6-cell, clean XP Pro
T61: 14.1"w 1280x800, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, Intel X3100, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 4965agn, 4-cell, clean XP Pro

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#3 Post by hoax32 » Sat Sep 29, 2012 11:39 pm

thanks for the reply!
I currently don't have any empty CD's on me so Im gonna go run MemTest throughout the night.
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#4 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 12:06 pm

I checked ~ 3.8GB/4GB Ram 5 tiimes over night and switched ram modules in the morning and tested 3 times again - no errors......no idea what caused it

Any other ideas?
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

miro_gt
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#5 Post by miro_gt » Sun Sep 30, 2012 1:49 pm

then your video overclock is too high, which I believe I have mentioned before.
T61: 14.1" 1400x1050, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, nVidia 140m @ 600/925 MHz, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 5300agn, FP, BT, 6-cell, clean XP Pro
T61: 14.1"w 1280x800, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, Intel X3100, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 4965agn, 4-cell, clean XP Pro

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#6 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 2:53 pm

miro_gt wrote:then your video overclock is too high, which I believe I have mentioned before.
it used to be higher without any problems. [CORE @ 750MHz MEM @1100MHz SAHDER @1700MHz]
Now i run at Core @700MHz MEM@990MHz Shader @1600MHz
I ran Furmark and played BF3 for hours and couldn't make the Error appear again :/
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

miro_gt
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#7 Post by miro_gt » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:37 pm

you cant run that high without expecting problems kid, get used to it.
T61: 14.1" 1400x1050, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, nVidia 140m @ 600/925 MHz, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 5300agn, FP, BT, 6-cell, clean XP Pro
T61: 14.1"w 1280x800, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, Intel X3100, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 4965agn, 4-cell, clean XP Pro

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#8 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 3:40 pm

miro_gt wrote:you cant run that high without expecting problems kid, get used to it.
im an adult...... and i have bin overlclocking for years....and my vcore is modded [1.25V].....so yes i can :D
and if furmark over night doesnt find a wekspot in OCing the GPU then nothing does haha
the GPU has bin Hard Modded / OCed since months
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

rkawakami
Admin
Admin
Posts: 10053
Joined: Sun Jun 04, 2006 1:26 am
Location: San Jose, CA 95120 USA
Contact:

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#9 Post by rkawakami » Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:01 pm

Memories and processors are designed to be run at specific maximum rates by their manufacturers. They only support proper operation of the components at those limits. Once you exceed them, expect to get transient errors no matter how much testing you do. In fact, those errors can even occur during in-spec operation. Memory can have "soft errors"; a failure to properly store a bit that's not due to some physical defect in the memory array but one caused by a random alpha particle (i.e., radiation) or power supply fluctuations.

That you got a "parity check" error, probably means the source is from the video memory. The main memory system in the T61 does not support parity, otherwise you would be using ECC memory modules. And if the laptop was using ECC memory, then you probably wouldn't get any parity errors from the main memory as the error correction routines would handle most of the soft errors.
Ray Kawakami
X22 X24 X31 X41 X41T X60 X60s X61 X61s X200 X200s X300 X301 Z60m Z61t Z61p 560 560Z 600 600E 600X T21 T22 T23 T41 T60p T410 T420 T520 W500 W520 R50 A21p A22p A31 A31p
NOTE: All links to PC-Doctor software hosted by me are dead. Files removed 8/28/12 by manufacturer's demand.

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#10 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:20 pm

rkawakami wrote:Memories and processors are designed to be run at specific maximum rates by their manufacturers. They only support proper operation of the components at those limits. Once you exceed them, expect to get transient errors no matter how much testing you do. In fact, those errors can even occur during in-spec operation. Memory can have "soft errors"; a failure to properly store a bit that's not due to some physical defect in the memory array but one caused by a random alpha particle (i.e., radiation) or power supply fluctuations.

That you got a "parity check" error, probably means the source is from the video memory. The main memory system in the T61 does not support parity, otherwise you would be using ECC memory modules. And if the laptop was using ECC memory, then you probably wouldn't get any parity errors from the main memory as the error correction routines would handle most of the soft errors.
It underwent 6 hours of video memory testing @ 990MHz while running furmark at the same time.
I mean if this means that it was a 1 time problem, then it's not that big of a deal....considering the max temps have increased by 2*C compared to the Original clock.
And the G84/G6 cores are considered to be 1 of the best chips to overclock. (debatable though)
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

cadillacmike68
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#11 Post by cadillacmike68 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 4:25 pm

If the OP wants to fry his T61 by continuously overclocking it, let him. :roll:

Jeez, I thought this overclocking nonsense went away with the pentium 1 & 2 era...
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#12 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:41 pm

cadillacmike68 wrote:If the OP wants to fry his T61 by continuously overclocking it, let him. :roll:

Jeez, I thought this overclocking nonsense went away with the pentium 1 & 2 era...
^ That doesn't make any sense.....
How can I fry a chip that does not show any signs of instabillity / overheating [after 6 hours of stress testing] and has a lower temp OCed than most T61's withstock clock out there? [52*C-79*C]
And why not OC if you know you have a "safe" unit with a chip that is famous for it's OC capabillitys?
AND why not enjoy the extra 3000 3D mark 03 points and a the sweet 35 frames/sec in GTA4?

Please explain.
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15740
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#13 Post by ajkula66 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:49 pm

Two facts to consider, OP:

1) From Ray's (rkawakami) profile:

Occupation: Memory Test Engineer

2) While I occasionally have public disagreements (in a respectful manner on both sides by all means) with miro_gt, the fact of the matter is that he's one of the very few people who have managed to run an overclocked nVidia-based T61 for five years without frying the planar, so apart from sheer luck (in obtaining a better-than-average unit in the first place), he's gotta know something about the matter at hand...so if he's advising you to "get used to it" I'd take these words into consideration...

Personally, I was never a fan of overclocking laptop circuitry, but that's me.
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: T61p

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#14 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 5:54 pm

^ Thank you for the reply!
Im running mine for 1 year now OCed (08/08 unit).
also with copper shims attached to the gddr3 chips and a custome cooling heatsink.
and a custome vcore [stabillity purposes.
Eating a crap load of power but hey - need every bid of it for 3D projects.
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

miro_gt
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 7:08 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#15 Post by miro_gt » Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:11 pm

here's couple more things to consider:

- dont count that you have a "safe" machine, that's how you can get over-confident and mess up things;
- you got BSOD, so how many hours you have ran Furmark is irrelevant;
- you have increased video core voltage, but I highly doubt that you've done so with the video memory chip;
- one time problem only shows that there is a problem, do not disregard it;

to solve the problem, lower the video memory clock.

on a side note, I'm interested to see your custom video memory chip cooling solution - post a picture if you have one. The chip itself will not heat up as much so that it would need cooling though, much like regular DDR3 RAM (for newer laptops) working at 1,600 MHz and up.
T61: 14.1" 1400x1050, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, nVidia 140m @ 600/925 MHz, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 5300agn, FP, BT, 6-cell, clean XP Pro
T61: 14.1"w 1280x800, T9500 @ 2.8GHz, 4GB RAM CL4, Intel X3100, Samsung 830 256GB, DVD-rec, 4965agn, 4-cell, clean XP Pro

hoax32
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 262
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:34 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#16 Post by hoax32 » Sun Sep 30, 2012 11:29 pm

miro_gt wrote:here's couple more things to consider:

- dont count that you have a "safe" machine, that's how you can get over-confident and mess up things;
- you got BSOD, so how many hours you have ran Furmark is irrelevant;
- you have increased video core voltage, but I highly doubt that you've done so with the video memory chip;
- one time problem only shows that there is a problem, do not disregard it;

to solve the problem, lower the video memory clock.

on a side note, I'm interested to see your custom video memory chip cooling solution - post a picture if you have one. The chip itself will not heat up as much so that it would need cooling though, much like regular DDR3 RAM (for newer laptops) working at 1,600 MHz and up.

I don't count on it....thats why I did some cooling procedures and improvements before OCing including having a second Intel Motherboard on hand incase the something goes wrong.
Also reading for hours on forums and looking at some tutorials and tests helps alot and gives you a good overview.

infact just found out it was my wifi card - i just figured out that when ever i would use the wireless switch, it would BS on me -I put in a differenct 4965AGN from my R61 and voila problem solved.....was the last thing that i would have suspected.

-no i did not increase vram voltage - core ONLY, since I didn't eperience any stabillity issues even at 1.1GHz VRAM so there is no need at now 975MHz
-i have seen many different BS that appeared once and never came back - of course that doesn't mean to just ignore it

@chip cooling - i attach some of these http://www.ebay.com/itm/2PC-1-2M-HP-LAP ... 4abcaa3fca but smaller to all chips that are too hot to the touch. [only if it does not cripple ventilation]
and taking my t61 appart is fun and stuff but i don't do that just for a picture - look up pictures showing the bottom and top of the motherboard - there you will see memory chips - i attached .5mm copper pads to most of em [including the 1s coverred under the black static protection foil.
IBM ThinkPad X22
-----------------------------------

CPU: Intel Pentium III-M Tualatin @1.13GHz
GPU: ATI Mobility Radeon 8MB DDR [OC'ed] CORE: @213MHz - MEM: @200MHz
RAM: 640MB 133MHz SD RAM 3-3-3-6
HDD: 30GB ATA 5400RPM 8MB Cache
OS: XP SP3

cadillacmike68
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#17 Post by cadillacmike68 » Tue Oct 02, 2012 2:37 am

cadillacmike68 wrote:If the OP wants to fry his T61 by continuously overclocking it, let him. :roll:

Jeez, I thought this overclocking nonsense went away with the pentium 1 & 2 era...
hoax32 wrote:^ That doesn't make any sense.....
How can I fry a chip that does not show any signs of instabillity / overheating [after 6 hours of stress testing] and has a lower temp OCed than most T61's withstock clock out there? [52*C-79*C]
And why not OC if you know you have a "safe" unit with a chip that is famous for it's OC capabillitys?
AND why not enjoy the extra 3000 3D mark 03 points and a the sweet 35 frames/sec in GTA4?
Please explain.
Well, how about the NMI you got earlier which prompted this whole series of posts? It's your machine and your money when you eventually do fry it. Do have fun with it though.

As for me, I'd rather be overclocking my Platinum ed NorthStar STS on the interstate, or turning all heads in my 1968 DVC than watch anything on a computer screen.
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2

cadillacmike68
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#18 Post by cadillacmike68 » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:23 am

cadillacmike68 wrote:
As for me, I'd rather be overclocking my Platinum ed NorthStar STS on the interstate, or turning all heads in my 1968 DVC than watch anything on a computer screen.
And i got to do both while on leave for a few days back hone :mrgreen: BTW, DVC stands for DeVille Convertible. Quite the distinctive road machine.
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2

ajkula66
SuperUserGeorge
SuperUserGeorge
Posts: 15740
Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#19 Post by ajkula66 » Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:52 pm

cadillacmike68 wrote: BTW, DVC stands for DeVille Convertible. Quite the distinctive road machine.
It most certainly is.

One of my favourite American cars. Enjoy it. I know I would...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)

Cheers,

George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)

AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF

Abused daily: T61p

PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.

cadillacmike68
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)

Re: ***T61*** NMI: Parity Check / Memory Parity Error

#20 Post by cadillacmike68 » Fri Dec 07, 2012 8:47 am

Well, this thread is now officially hijacked. 8) As soon as the OP actually fries his mobo, we can go back to the original topic.

I got the DVC up about 100 - it needs a timing adjustment, knocks even with 93 Octane fuel. I need to having the timing set back and the springs in the mechanical advance adjusted. I don't want to damage the overhauled engine. :o

The STS is another matter. With the rear drive V8 NorthStar it flies. C&D or R&T (can't remember) listed the 2004's top end at 156 MPH - drag induced, meaning at the speed the car's HP is unable to overcome the increased wind resistance. Mine is a 2009 Platinum edition with larger tires (& factory 18" chrome wheels :wink: ). I have it on good authority that is easily goes to 142 on a straight part of interstate before catching up to some congestion :mrgreen: Wife's CTS is no slouch either it's a V6 but with only a few lower HP and it's s few hundred pounds lighter. Reports are that one has hit 133 easily, but needs a long straight empty road to really test it out. Of course I'll have to wait 8 more months until i get back home.

The '96 Fleetwood should be super fast as well, but it is governed to 108. But all hope is not lost. There is a tuner specializing on is correcting this "error" in the car's PCM. I'd need to find some H rated whitewalls to really test it out though.
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests