AHCI and SSD
-
cadillacmike68
- Senior Member

- Posts: 708
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
- Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)
Re: AHCI and SSD
Thanks for the info dr_st.
True on the preferences. Reviving from a hibernation would hang my machine while it tries to re-establish a non-activated internet connection.
On the pagefile being on an SSD, wouldn't all those writes shorten the life of the SSD? I know that the newer ones are supposed to be much more reliable but there is still a finite number of writes a particular SSD cell can tolerate.
I'm still a ways away from getting an SSD, need to get a win 7 license (not going to bother with an SSD and XP), and figure out a way to port the applications - if possible, because there are so many to bring over. That's probably not possible, so the rule of inertia will likely dig in and cause me to put this off even further.
True on the preferences. Reviving from a hibernation would hang my machine while it tries to re-establish a non-activated internet connection.
On the pagefile being on an SSD, wouldn't all those writes shorten the life of the SSD? I know that the newer ones are supposed to be much more reliable but there is still a finite number of writes a particular SSD cell can tolerate.
I'm still a ways away from getting an SSD, need to get a win 7 license (not going to bother with an SSD and XP), and figure out a way to port the applications - if possible, because there are so many to bring over. That's probably not possible, so the rule of inertia will likely dig in and cause me to put this off even further.
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2
Re: AHCI and SSD
. Perhaps. So? There are a finite number of actions any device can take. Should we read in the dark because there is a finite number of hours the lightbulb can work? There is also a finite number of breaths we can take. Should we stop breathing?On the pagefile being on an SSD, wouldn't all those writes shorten the life of the SSD? I know that the newer ones are supposed to be much more reliable but there is still a finite number of writes a particular SSD cell can tolerate.
As was said earlier in this thread, by myself and Thinkrob at least, with modern SSDs there is no need to be too concerned with writes. I haven't seen a single survey or practical research that showed that normal read/write patterns shorten the life of the SSD below what is still about twice the life expectancy of the average computer. The average hard drive will probably die way before that.
Current: X220 4291-4BG, T410 2537-R46, T60 1952-F76, T60 2007-QPG, T42 2373-F7G
Collectibles: T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X32 (IPS Screen)
Retired: X61 7673-V2V, A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
Past: Z61t 9440-A23, T60 2623-D3U, X32 2884-M5U
Collectibles: T430s (IPS FHD + Classic Keyboard), X32 (IPS Screen)
Retired: X61 7673-V2V, A31p w/ Ultrabay Numpad
Past: Z61t 9440-A23, T60 2623-D3U, X32 2884-M5U
Re: AHCI and SSD
As far as I've read, cases of SSD dying unrelated to flash endurance are not unheard of, but cases of SSD dying related to flash endurance haven't crossed my mind, yet.
It seems that sometimes people forget that electronics are/can still (be) consumables, they just usually last (much) longer than their mechanical counterparts.
Cheers.
It seems that sometimes people forget that electronics are/can still (be) consumables, they just usually last (much) longer than their mechanical counterparts.
Cheers.
Re: AHCI and SSD
I love ssds, use them to the max, but remember have a good backup/recovery plan. When they quit, they usually give no warning.
Scott
Scott
Re: AHCI and SSD
"Prefetch", at least in Windows terminology, is probably not a useful feature with an SSD. It's exactly what it says on the tin: pre-fetching data that the OS expects to use so as to avoid waiting on slow IO (particularly slow random IO.) SSDs don't suffer from slow seek times and are generally fast enough that I wouldn't bother.
Hibernation? Keep it if you use it, drop it if you don't. Personally I don't use it since it's a serious security risk for those of us that use encrypted filesystems...
Hibernation? Keep it if you use it, drop it if you don't. Personally I don't use it since it's a serious security risk for those of us that use encrypted filesystems...
Need help with Linux or FreeBSD? Catch me on IRC: I'm ThinkRob on FreeNode and EFnet.
Code: Select all
Current laptop: X1 Carbon 3
Current workstation: noneRe: AHCI and SSD
Folks, there is a thread on another forum that seems to read like garbage collection takes place using Xp and a Crucial drive, any comments? see link below
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2229683
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2229683
Re: AHCI and SSD
Hmmm, Windows or Linux? I use hibernation on an SSD in Linux with a LUKS encrypted LVM setup. This way everything apart of the small boot partition hosting the kernel is encrypted, included the swap volume used for hibernation.ThinkRob wrote:Hibernation? Keep it if you use it, drop it if you don't. Personally I don't use it since it's a serious security risk for those of us that use encrypted filesystems...
Broken T23 2647-9RG | A few 14.1" T61 Frankenpads | Two 15" Frankenpad T61+ with UXGA IPS Display
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15736
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: AHCI and SSD
I haven't seen a proof of that statement in the linked thread...burns334 wrote:Folks, there is a thread on another forum that seems to read like garbage collection takes place using Xp and a Crucial drive, any comments? see link below
http://forums.anandtech.com/showthread.php?t=2229683
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Re: AHCI and SSD
afaik both BitLocker (asks for my encryption key when I resume from hibernation) and (afaik) TrueCrypt also encrypt the hibernation file, so I have no idea where this security issues is supposed to pop up.rumbero wrote:Hmmm, Windows or Linux? I use hibernation on an SSD in Linux with a LUKS encrypted LVM setup. This way everything apart of the small boot partition hosting the kernel is encrypted, included the swap volume used for hibernation.
S3 Standby, that is a security issue indeed for full-disk encryption. Hibernation? would be new to me.
Re: AHCI and SSD
I haven't seen a proof of that statement in the linked thread..
I like the work "proof", exactly how can one see if it is collecting garbage or not?
I like the work "proof", exactly how can one see if it is collecting garbage or not?
-
ajkula66
- SuperUserGeorge

- Posts: 15736
- Joined: Sun Feb 25, 2007 11:28 am
- Location: Brodheadsville, Pennsylvania
Re: AHCI and SSD
Elementary, my dear Watson...burns334 wrote:I like the work "proof", exactly how can one see if it is collecting garbage or not?
How TRIM works is rather well known and I'm not going to explain it here.
We ALL know that there's no TRIM support in XP or Vista.
Therefore, one would need a program that can be run manually in order to perform "garbage collection".
I'm well aware of such utilities for Intel and Samsung SSDs, but not for Crucial ones although C300 and M4 take the second and third place on my "Top Five" SSD list.
The fact that someone states "yes, that's what the drive does when it's idle" doesn't hold much water, not with me anyway.
In the world where marketing is (almost) everything, I'm dead certain that Crucial themselves would be loudly advertising such a capability if it were there in the first place...
...Knowledge is a deadly friend when no one sets the rules...(King Crimson)
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Cheers,
George (your grouchy retired FlexView farmer)
AARP club members:A31p, T43pSF
Abused daily: R61
PMs requesting personal tech support will be ignored.
Re: AHCI and SSD
It may not, but it is imperically-observable. Anandtech's benchmarks do a good job of demonstrating this.ajkula66 wrote: The fact that someone states "yes, that's what the drive does when it's idle" doesn't hold much water, not with me anyway.
Need help with Linux or FreeBSD? Catch me on IRC: I'm ThinkRob on FreeNode and EFnet.
Code: Select all
Current laptop: X1 Carbon 3
Current workstation: none-
cadillacmike68
- Senior Member

- Posts: 708
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
- Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)
Re: AHCI and SSD
On the pagefile being on an SSD, wouldn't all those writes shorten the life of the SSD? I know that the newer ones are supposed to be much more reliable but there is still a finite number of writes a particular SSD cell can tolerate.
Well, My T30 is 10 yrs old, so an SSD should last 20 years?dr_st wrote:Perhaps. So? There are a finite number of actions any device can take. Should we read in the dark because there is a finite number of hours the lightbulb can work? There is also a finite number of breaths we can take. Should we stop breathing?
As was said earlier in this thread, by myself and Thinkrob at least, with modern SSDs there is no need to be too concerned with writes. I haven't seen a single survey or practical research that showed that normal read/write patterns shorten the life of the SSD below what is still about twice the life expectancy of the average computer. The average hard drive will probably die way before that.
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2
Re: AHCI and SSD
Via Slashdot...
"SSD Write Endurance Considered... Sufficient"
http://ef.gy/statistics:ssd-write-endurance
Cheers.
"SSD Write Endurance Considered... Sufficient"
http://ef.gy/statistics:ssd-write-endurance
Cheers.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Low Intel X25-M G2 SSD read speed in X60s with AHCI
by dandreye » Wed Feb 08, 2017 5:59 am » in Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet - 19 Replies
- 1938 Views
-
Last post by dandreye
Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:35 pm
-
-
- 4 Replies
- 1385 Views
-
Last post by dandreye
Mon Mar 06, 2017 12:32 pm
-
-
X1C1 SSD replacement with eBay DIY SSD success
by aabram » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:11 pm » in ThinkPad X1/X1C - 2 Replies
- 1353 Views
-
Last post by w0qj
Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:11 am
-
-
-
WTB: Thinkpad with good processor , ssd and 32+GB RAM
by Farro » Thu Jan 19, 2017 9:11 am » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 4 Replies
- 439 Views
-
Last post by Farro
Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:55 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: marmoset and 12 guests






