Cloning vs Imaging

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Message
Author
Cigarguy
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1435
Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2012 3:08 pm
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#31 Post by Cigarguy » Fri Mar 15, 2013 10:53 pm

A good cloning software should allow you to clone drive A to B and can restore from drive B to X irrespective of where or what the machine environment is.

I've used Clonezilla for many years for this purpose. For many years I've been involved with a charity educating victims of landmines in my native country of Cambodia. We teach kids who've been victims of landmines a trade in order for them to make a living of some sort. The school that we set up are really appreciative of computers, especially laptops. Most of the T61 that have passed my way are sent on to Cambodia for this purpose. The schools have a particular need, software wise, and setup that they want. I would set everything up here, clone the HDD and send the HDD to Cambodia. They take the drive and pop into their T61 and away they go.

The school use T60, T61, T400 and X201. I have images for all of these machines. Whenever they need one I'll simply restore the image here onto a HDD and forward it on. I have an external USB drive caddy that takes two drives for this purpose.

As others have said, always check the restored drive after the cloning process.

RealBlackStuff
Admin
Admin
Posts: 17500
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:17 am
Location: Mt. Cobb, PA USA
Contact:

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#32 Post by RealBlackStuff » Sat Mar 16, 2013 5:08 am

taichi wrote:I reread your post, RBS, and now see that you are saying that the Thinkpad image can be restored to any Thinkpad.
I took from your clarifying second post (hopefully correctly) that the Thinkpad image can be otherwise restored onto any other Windows computer.
Have you ever used Rebit software?
Partly correct, you can restore to ANY HD. But you have to put that HD in a TP that more or less matches the TP the image was taken from. E.g. a T40 image won't work in a T60 and v.v., but a T60 image might work in a Dell D620.
I have successfully used the same W7 image from a T410 in T400/R60/T61/R61/X60/X61 machines.
Works in all of them after W7 self-adjusts a few drivers. The above TPs are similar enough in hardware.

Never heard of Rebit.
I don't do backups, I take images instead.
Lovely day for a Guinness! (The Real Black Stuff)

Check out The Boardroom for Parts, Mods and Other Services.

ch27
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:14 am
Location: Landenberg, PA

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#33 Post by ch27 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:41 am

I used the Linux based Redo Backup and Recovery (redobackup.org) to create images for my T60p, T42, and R50p all using the same ultrabay adapter (from Tuus and I removed the extra tab) and sata drive. Boot from CD, choose backup or recovery, then source and destination drives.
T60p sxga+ FlexView
R50p uxga FlexView
T42 sxga+ FlexView

Paul Pavlik
Freshman Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#34 Post by Paul Pavlik » Sun Mar 17, 2013 6:42 pm

I use Apricorn EZgig to make Clones of my HD.

I have found that if I clone From Internal to External (Drive in USB Enclosure), the resulting Clone (after mounting it in the internal Drive Bay) is not reliable. About 20% if the time, it will not boot, just a blinking cursor.

If I Clone from External to Internal, the Clone is 100% reliable.

Apricorn states that the Thinkpad requires Ext to Int Cloning for Reliable Clones.

I also make Image Backups (of the Internal Drive) to a External Drive in USB Enclosure.

The one time that I restored a Image from the External Drive to Internal Drive, it was a Success. Haven't tried it since.

taichi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#35 Post by taichi » Sun Mar 17, 2013 8:33 pm

Paul Pavlik wrote:I use Apricorn EZgig to make Clones of my HD...

...If I Clone from External to Internal, the Clone is 100% reliable...

...I also make Image Backups (of the Internal Drive) to a External Drive in USB Enclosure.

The one time that I restored a Image from the External Drive to Internal Drive, it was a Success. Haven't tried it since.
When you clone external to internal, how do you first boot your system to do the clone, and what software so you use?

If I recall correctly, i do not need any caddy or device if I pull my drive from the Thinkpad and insert it in the Apricorn.

Do I need anything other than a bare drive (another 500GB Scorpio Black) to insert the drive internally?

The caddies and adapters are for the Ultrabay, correct?

And what do you use to image and restore?

Thanks

Paul Pavlik
Freshman Member
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 6:29 pm
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#36 Post by Paul Pavlik » Sun Mar 17, 2013 9:58 pm

Paul Pavlik wrote:I use Apricorn EZgig to make Clones of my HD...

...If I Clone from External to Internal, the Clone is 100% reliable...

...I also make Image Backups (of the Internal Drive) to a External Drive in USB Enclosure.

The one time that I restored a Image from the External Drive to Internal Drive, it was a Success. Haven't tried it since.
When you clone external to internal, how do you first boot your system to do the clone, and what software so you use?

I boot from the Apricorn CD.

If I recall correctly, i do not need any caddy or device if I pull my drive from the Thinkpad and insert it in the Apricorn.

Correct, you put it into the USB Drive Enclosure.

Do I need anything other than a bare drive (another 500GB Scorpio Black) to insert the drive internally?

No.

The caddies and adapters are for the Ultrabay, correct?

No. You remove the Drive from the ThinkPad and put it into the USB Drive Enclosure. This will be the SOURCE Drive.

Then. you put the New Drive in the Thinkpad Regular Drive Bay, using the Drive Caddy. This will be the TARGET Drive. You do NOT have to use the UltraBay.


And what do you use to image and restore?

The Apricorn CD has a Program that you can load on the PC that you run to create a Image.
Then, you can boot from the Apricorn CD if you have to restore the Image


Thanks
T60 2623-D9U 15" XGA 1.66ghz Core Duo
2gb 60gb, Radeon X1300 XP Pro

T60 2623-DAU 15" XGA 1.83ghz Core Duo
2gb 80gb, Radeon X1300 XP Pro

robert213
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 471
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 11:17 am
Location: IN: Indianapolis

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#37 Post by robert213 » Sun Mar 17, 2013 11:45 pm

taichi wrote: When you clone external to internal, how do you first boot your system to do the clone, and what software so you use?
1) Most folks have purchased True Image Home.

2) True Image Home has a feature which creates Acronis Windows Bootable CD.

3) Then, they place the CD from step 2) into the DVD/CD player in the UltraBay.

4) Press [F1] to update BIOS to place DVD/CD ahead of HD in boot start-up sequence

5) Their machines boot from the CD in UltraBay.

6) They connect the USB HD Enclosure to machine.

7) They run True Image Home located on Acronis Windows Bootable CD.

8) Then they either choose Create Image or Clone HD.
Tuus-built T61: T8100 2.1 GHz, SXGA+, NVS140M, Patriot 4GB PC2-6400 DDR2-800, Samsung 840 120GB; Thinkpad T30: P4M 1.8 GHz, HYNIX 512 MB PC2700S DDR, Hitachi Travelstar 7K100 100GB; SilverStone Raven RVS01; 97 Volvo 850-R, 85 Mitsubishi Starion-ES, Keilwerth SX-90R, Ensoniq TS-12, Kawai EP-608

jedisurfer1
Sophomore Member
Posts: 222
Joined: Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:57 am
Location: California

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#38 Post by jedisurfer1 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:40 am

has anyone mentioned clonezilla, f12 to boot from cd and clone.
P50 Xeon 48gb
Dell m4800 QHD+ 32gb, wigig, 32" BenQ 4k, 28" Asus 4k
Latitude E7240 12.5" 1080p touch
3x W520 2760qm ESX 5.1 32gb, 4x 2tb Virtualized Freenas
X61t sxga+

ch27
Posts: 21
Joined: Fri Jan 27, 2012 9:14 am
Location: Landenberg, PA

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#39 Post by ch27 » Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:23 am

Many software solutions have been mentioned but has anyone used these dual bay hard drive docking stations with clone functions? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 1DS0CD0642
Most are about $50 or less. It says it doesn't even require a PC to clone the drive.
T60p sxga+ FlexView
R50p uxga FlexView
T42 sxga+ FlexView

taichi
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 574
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2007 2:07 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#40 Post by taichi » Tue Mar 19, 2013 12:25 pm

ShadowProtect, which an earlier poster mentioned, looks interesting because of the apparent high level of restore success, the high level of support, the ability to restore to different hardware, and the ability to run the image as a virtual machine.

It is not inexpensive, though, and it requires that it is always connected (it continuously updates the image, like a backup). This means that the Thinkpad always has a little companion...a little external drive!

cadillacmike68
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 708
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 9:19 pm
Location: Not on Planet Znutar (FL)

Re: Cloning vs Imaging

#41 Post by cadillacmike68 » Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:06 am

ch27 wrote:Many software solutions have been mentioned but has anyone used these dual bay hard drive docking stations with clone functions? http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.a ... 1DS0CD0642
Most are about $50 or less. It says it doesn't even require a PC to clone the drive.

I prefer the ThinkPad Advanced Dock. It has an Ultrabay that you can use to eliminate any need for a USB enclosure. You can get a used dock for ~$50 from this forum (from TuuS), and it is much more versatile.

My preferred setup is boot CD in the advanced dock, original HDD still in the original / primary / main / internal bay and the new clone HDD in ThinkPad's UltraBay in a 2nd HDD Adapter tray.

That way, if the new drive is intended for a different machine I don't have to move things around in the original ThinkPad.

Other than a few early learning experiences, I have not had any problems cloning with the original HDD in the primary bay, and I've done a lot of cloning, on a variety of ThinkPads.
760LD 9547 FUBARd
T21 2647; T22 2647 4@ 900MHz, 1@ 1GHz SXGA+; T23 2647 2@ 1.13GHz, 1@ 1.2GHz SXGA+, WiFi
T30 2366-88U 2GHz; 2366-83U 1.8G; 5@ 2366-LU0/66U; 2367-KU6 FUBARd
T61 8897, 2.4GHz SXGA+; 8898, 2.4GHz; 6463, 2.4 & 2.1GHz WSXGA+; 7658, 2.5GHz; T61p, 3 more T61s
T500 2

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests