P9700 fail..

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
ELCouz
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:37 am
Location: QC/CAN

P9700 fail..

#1 Post by ELCouz » Thu Jun 25, 2015 7:41 pm

Hi,

I installed the P9700 1066 FSB in the T61p with the hardware mod (BSEL).

Boot fine but I get a failed Prime95 result after 10-20 seconds (hardware failure message round error should be less than 0.4)

I've flashed my RAM SPD (running at 354 mhz now ...normal???)

I'm using the samsung 2x2gb DDR-800 M470T5663QZ3-CF7 modules.


Any clues?

ELCouz
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:37 am
Location: QC/CAN

Re: P9700 fail..

#2 Post by ELCouz » Thu Jun 25, 2015 8:29 pm

After further reading it say that the 3:4 divider for RAM is unstable.

I have the nvidia board.

My samsung now run at 443 mhz and stable ... no error on prime95... why???

Funny fact it's overclocked now by 43 mhz and not giving errors...

axur-delmeria
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1270
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 am
Location: Metro Manila, Philippines

Re: P9700 fail..

#3 Post by axur-delmeria » Thu Jun 25, 2015 10:54 pm

Try a few memtest86+ passes (multithreaded) to make sure the RAM is stable).
Daily driver: X220 4291-P79 i5-2520M

In reserve: X61 T7500, X60 T2300
In pieces: X60s CS U1300 [board only], two retired but working X61Ts
RIP: 760XD 9546-U9E

ELCouz
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:37 am
Location: QC/CAN

Re: P9700 fail..

#4 Post by ELCouz » Fri Jun 26, 2015 8:13 am

axur-delmeria wrote:Try a few memtest86+ passes (multithreaded) to make sure the RAM is stable).
Yeah thanks...

Any clue why a lower mem freq is unstable and higher overclocked one is stable?

Isn't suposed to be the opposite?

RMSMajestic
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 586
Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:31 pm
Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, USA

Re: P9700 fail..

#5 Post by RMSMajestic » Tue Jun 30, 2015 11:52 am

ELCouz wrote:
axur-delmeria wrote:Try a few memtest86+ passes (multithreaded) to make sure the RAM is stable).
Yeah thanks...

Any clue why a lower mem freq is unstable and higher overclocked one is stable?

Isn't suposed to be the opposite?
If you have used thaiphoon burner, the latency under 533Mhz is CL4 normally, which means you will be getting 711Mhz@CL4 overclocked.
And the latency under 667Mhz is CL5 on default, you will be getting 888Mhz @CL5 when overclocked.

Some RAMs are less capable of running at lower latency rather than at higher frequency. I have one like this, capable of running 888Mhz @ CL6 but not 711Mhz@CL5 :/ But only one
Chobits: W701ds i7-940|32G|FX3800m|Digitizer|Calibrator
Big ones: W701 top config T63p QX9300|8G|UXGA T61p dead, please go die as well nVIDIA
Small ones: X61sp P8800X61t SXGA X201 NIB
86 airplane models/ 27 ships/ 21 computers/ 300GB databases/ 0 girlfriend
It's always happier to live in lies and delusions.

ELCouz
Posts: 35
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2014 11:37 am
Location: QC/CAN

Re: P9700 fail..

#6 Post by ELCouz » Tue Jun 30, 2015 4:42 pm

RMSMajestic wrote:
If you have used thaiphoon burner, the latency under 533Mhz is CL4 normally, which means you will be getting 711Mhz@CL4 overclocked.
And the latency under 667Mhz is CL5 on default, you will be getting 888Mhz @CL5 when overclocked.

Some RAMs are less capable of running at lower latency rather than at higher frequency. I have one like this, capable of running 888Mhz @ CL6 but not 711Mhz@CL5 :/ But only one

Finally throwed my Samsung DDR2-800 so-dimms in the bin...

My DDR2-533 sticks runs fine at 354 mhz.

Did 7 hours of Prime95 (blend) and 2 hours of memtestx86+

So far so good!

Post Reply

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 91011 and 33 guests