P9700 fail..
P9700 fail..
Hi,
I installed the P9700 1066 FSB in the T61p with the hardware mod (BSEL).
Boot fine but I get a failed Prime95 result after 10-20 seconds (hardware failure message round error should be less than 0.4)
I've flashed my RAM SPD (running at 354 mhz now ...normal???)
I'm using the samsung 2x2gb DDR-800 M470T5663QZ3-CF7 modules.
Any clues?
I installed the P9700 1066 FSB in the T61p with the hardware mod (BSEL).
Boot fine but I get a failed Prime95 result after 10-20 seconds (hardware failure message round error should be less than 0.4)
I've flashed my RAM SPD (running at 354 mhz now ...normal???)
I'm using the samsung 2x2gb DDR-800 M470T5663QZ3-CF7 modules.
Any clues?
Re: P9700 fail..
After further reading it say that the 3:4 divider for RAM is unstable.
I have the nvidia board.
My samsung now run at 443 mhz and stable ... no error on prime95... why???
Funny fact it's overclocked now by 43 mhz and not giving errors...
I have the nvidia board.
My samsung now run at 443 mhz and stable ... no error on prime95... why???
Funny fact it's overclocked now by 43 mhz and not giving errors...
-
axur-delmeria
- ThinkPadder

- Posts: 1270
- Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 5:49 am
- Location: Metro Manila, Philippines
Re: P9700 fail..
Try a few memtest86+ passes (multithreaded) to make sure the RAM is stable).
Daily driver: X220 4291-P79 i5-2520M
In reserve: X61 T7500, X60 T2300
In pieces: X60s CS U1300 [board only], two retired but working X61Ts
RIP: 760XD 9546-U9E
In reserve: X61 T7500, X60 T2300
In pieces: X60s CS U1300 [board only], two retired but working X61Ts
RIP: 760XD 9546-U9E
Re: P9700 fail..
Yeah thanks...axur-delmeria wrote:Try a few memtest86+ passes (multithreaded) to make sure the RAM is stable).
Any clue why a lower mem freq is unstable and higher overclocked one is stable?
Isn't suposed to be the opposite?
-
RMSMajestic
- Senior Member

- Posts: 586
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 5:31 pm
- Location: Jersey City, New Jersey, USA
Re: P9700 fail..
If you have used thaiphoon burner, the latency under 533Mhz is CL4 normally, which means you will be getting 711Mhz@CL4 overclocked.ELCouz wrote:Yeah thanks...axur-delmeria wrote:Try a few memtest86+ passes (multithreaded) to make sure the RAM is stable).
Any clue why a lower mem freq is unstable and higher overclocked one is stable?
Isn't suposed to be the opposite?
And the latency under 667Mhz is CL5 on default, you will be getting 888Mhz @CL5 when overclocked.
Some RAMs are less capable of running at lower latency rather than at higher frequency. I have one like this, capable of running 888Mhz @ CL6 but not 711Mhz@CL5 :/ But only one
Chobits: W701ds i7-940|32G|FX3800m|Digitizer|Calibrator
Big ones: W701 top config T63p QX9300|8G|UXGA T61p dead, please go die as well nVIDIA
Small ones: X61sp P8800X61t SXGA X201 NIB
86 airplane models/ 27 ships/ 21 computers/ 300GB databases/ 0 girlfriend
It's always happier to live in lies and delusions.
Big ones: W701 top config T63p QX9300|8G|UXGA T61p dead, please go die as well nVIDIA
Small ones: X61sp P8800X61t SXGA X201 NIB
86 airplane models/ 27 ships/ 21 computers/ 300GB databases/ 0 girlfriend
It's always happier to live in lies and delusions.
Re: P9700 fail..
RMSMajestic wrote:
If you have used thaiphoon burner, the latency under 533Mhz is CL4 normally, which means you will be getting 711Mhz@CL4 overclocked.
And the latency under 667Mhz is CL5 on default, you will be getting 888Mhz @CL5 when overclocked.
Some RAMs are less capable of running at lower latency rather than at higher frequency. I have one like this, capable of running 888Mhz @ CL6 but not 711Mhz@CL5 :/ But only one
Finally throwed my Samsung DDR2-800 so-dimms in the bin...
My DDR2-533 sticks runs fine at 354 mhz.
Did 7 hours of Prime95 (blend) and 2 hours of memtestx86+
So far so good!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: 91011 and 33 guests



