Can you compare the screen to, say, the LG SXGA+? Or anything else?WarrenInDe wrote:So far I am. I did the reinstall and am now in the middle of updates.
Once I get the XP and Thinkadvantage updates done I'll put in my extra stick of ram and start on Visual Studio.Net, Lightroom and the rest of my app.
Warren
T60p w/ IPS UXGA on Lenovo Outlet!
T60p 2613-CTO, 2.33GHz, 3GB ram, Intel 80gb G2 SSD, H7K 200GB/7200rpm, LG Flexview IPS SXGA+ screen, ATI FireGL V5250
Essential TP Hotfixes and Tweaks
Essential TP Hotfixes and Tweaks
-
WarrenInDe
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:25 pm
- Location: Middletown, DE
Original question still stands, even if it is outlet vs refurb.
Why would people want a slower 32-bit Core CPU based model, with 1 year warranty, when the core2duo widescreen T60p is the same price? If you need better than WSXGA+, the T61p is only a few months out..and will probably be around the same price. That "outlet" deal is no bargain at all.....
Why would people want a slower 32-bit Core CPU based model, with 1 year warranty, when the core2duo widescreen T60p is the same price? If you need better than WSXGA+, the T61p is only a few months out..and will probably be around the same price. That "outlet" deal is no bargain at all.....
IPS >>>>>>>> TN for one. In my opinion, my experience to using the laptop is probably most influenced by the display. I code for long periods of time staring at text and the better quality display, the easier it is for me to stare at it for so long. Plus from an architectural and performance standpoint, there's very little difference in terms of gain going from CD to C2D and 64-bit adoption isn't on my list of priorities. According to most reviews, gains are at best 5-10% clock for clock in specific applications doing specific tasks. IMO, this is a steal. The warranty is also 3 years.
Edit: The only cool thing I look forward to Santa Rosa is Robson (basically an additional layer of memory in the form of NAND? flash). Even then, everything else is the same except support for 4GB memory and faster bus. CD to Santa Rosa (w/ the faster bus) should be significant in terms of performance than C2D -> Santa Rosa. I think that difference will be much greater than the jump from CD -> C2D.
Edit: The only cool thing I look forward to Santa Rosa is Robson (basically an additional layer of memory in the form of NAND? flash). Even then, everything else is the same except support for 4GB memory and faster bus. CD to Santa Rosa (w/ the faster bus) should be significant in terms of performance than C2D -> Santa Rosa. I think that difference will be much greater than the jump from CD -> C2D.
-
Dodge DeBoulet
- Sophomore Member
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2007 12:42 pm
- Location: Brunswick, ME
From what I've seen, getting a faster CPU and running it at a slower speed will give you the same benefit with regard to minimizing heat. The added benefit, though, is that the speed is there when you need it . . .lophiomys wrote:IMHO the advantages are
+ IPS Flexview, 133 DPI
+ 4:3 over Widescreen
+ slower CPU (hoping for less heat dissipation)
+ XP over Vista
And you can still order the regular T60 with XP.
So in the end, the only real benefit is the screen, and strictly for those that prefer the Academy Ratio
(Current) T460p | i7-6820HQ | WQHD | nVidia 940MX | 72Wh Battery | 32GB RAM | 2TB Samsung 850 Pro SSD
(Retired) T420 | Core i5-2520M | HD+ | Intel HD 3000 | 57Wh Battery | 16GB RAM | 1TB + 250GB Samsung SSDsIt was the best bargain you'll ever find, IMO, from Lenovo.Proteus wrote:Original question still stands, even if it is outlet vs refurb.
Why would people want a slower 32-bit Core CPU based model, with 1 year warranty, when the core2duo widescreen T60p is the same price? If you need better than WSXGA+, the T61p is only a few months out..and will probably be around the same price. That "outlet" deal is no bargain at all.....
64 Bit is overrated. I can see why someone must use it, but not in a laptop, but in servers with 10GiB+ of memory, RAID'ed harddrives, and desktop GPUs. Doing simulations.
In my oppinion the T61 look ridiculous and have the most useless extra features like a webcam and a card reader. If i wanted that i'd buy a multimedia notebook like the Z-series, if i would even consider Lenovo one bit since HP certainly is comptetive in that area too.
But
Like evforme said, the really promising technology is the Robson tech, which i think does mean longer runtimes on battery.
I use my laptop for 10+ hours a day, and using TN screens is horrible in the long run. Even though many praise the quality of the T60 widescreens, i still think it isn't very good. See http://www.notebookreview.com/default.asp?newsID=3563 for example.
-
2 Bricks Short
- Freshman Member
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2007 8:36 pm
- Location: Keller, Texas
O.k. You are smarter than I am.Proteus wrote:Original question still stands, even if it is outlet vs refurb.
Why would people want a slower 32-bit Core CPU based model, with 1 year warranty, when the core2duo widescreen T60p is the same price? If you need better than WSXGA+, the T61p is only a few months out..and will probably be around the same price. That "outlet" deal is no bargain at all.....
It would be helpful if you could let me know where to get a good deal on a T7600 processor to go with this great screen.
T60P - 2623 DDU, T7600, 3GB, XP, Advanced Mini Dock, Samsung 215TW display
T61p - 8891 CTO, T9300, 4GB, Vista Bus 64
T61p - 8891 CTO, T9300, 4GB, Vista Bus 64
FWIW, all the Core (and Core 2?) CPUs that I've worked with run at a baseline speed of 1GHz so unless you need the speed I don't think a faster chip requires more power.
If you can get a chip with 4M Cache instead of 2M, you will get faster performance with a negligible increase in power consumption and heat.
-darren
If you can get a chip with 4M Cache instead of 2M, you will get faster performance with a negligible increase in power consumption and heat.
-darren
I just configured the same exact system as the t60p in this thread in the widescreen model. came to $2,076.99.Proteus wrote:Original question still stands, even if it is outlet vs refurb.
Why would people want a slower 32-bit Core CPU based model, with 1 year warranty, when the core2duo widescreen T60p is the same price? If you need better than WSXGA+, the T61p is only a few months out..and will probably be around the same price. That "outlet" deal is no bargain at all.....
the only differences being:
c2d 2.0 vs cd 2.0
widescreen WSXGA+ vs FV UXGA
now, I got the outlet deal for alot less then that, and considering the FV screen was like a $200 option... and 32 bit 64 bit? that's funny, because I know you don't even run a 64bit O.S.
-
pianowizard
- Senior ThinkPadder

- Posts: 8368
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
- Location: Ann Arbor, MI
- Contact:
According to benchmark results posted yesterday in another thread, the difference between them is only like 15%.okashira wrote:c2d 2.0 vs cd 2.0
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP
On average is actually quite less than that. 15% is probably as ideal as it'll ever get in a specific application/situation. You just don't have applications that will effectively use 2x the increase in cache size, as there are other significant bottlenecks in performance besides the CPU (memory, bus, hd, etc.). Santa Rosa should help to alleviate that w/ Robson. The rest of Santa Rosa is all hype.pianowizard wrote:According to benchmark results posted yesterday in another thread, the difference between them is only like 15%.okashira wrote:c2d 2.0 vs cd 2.0
Bumpity bump...
I received the first of two 2623-DDU T60p's yesterday. It actually arrived last Thursday, but there was a mix up in the mailroom, so I was not informed it had arrived.
The other one still requires some paperwork on my part to clear Customs.
Anyway, I have it side-by-side with my 2623-K8U T60 with the 41W6707 15" SXGA+ FlexView, and there is a difference... I can't say which one is "better" yet, but I have noticed what I would consider a defect with the T60p display (the 42T0344/42T0345 IDTech). If you have a bright region within a dark region, you will see some ghosting above and below the bright region, in the dark region. This is not "ghosting" in the sense of a slower pixel response times. This looks like some kind of voltage leak.
Change your desktop to a plain, solid colour... a dark colour (but not black!) works best. Then open a small window with a pure white background (like Notepad). Do you see a vertical column of slightly brighter region against the dark background, aligned with the window? Anyone know what I'm talking about?
I'll have to take a photo of the effect... I've seen this phenomenon before on older analog-driven LCD displays. I'm hope this is a defect (and Lenovo will replace it), and not a "feature" of the IDTech...
I received the first of two 2623-DDU T60p's yesterday. It actually arrived last Thursday, but there was a mix up in the mailroom, so I was not informed it had arrived.
Anyway, I have it side-by-side with my 2623-K8U T60 with the 41W6707 15" SXGA+ FlexView, and there is a difference... I can't say which one is "better" yet, but I have noticed what I would consider a defect with the T60p display (the 42T0344/42T0345 IDTech). If you have a bright region within a dark region, you will see some ghosting above and below the bright region, in the dark region. This is not "ghosting" in the sense of a slower pixel response times. This looks like some kind of voltage leak.
Change your desktop to a plain, solid colour... a dark colour (but not black!) works best. Then open a small window with a pure white background (like Notepad). Do you see a vertical column of slightly brighter region against the dark background, aligned with the window? Anyone know what I'm talking about?
I'll have to take a photo of the effect... I've seen this phenomenon before on older analog-driven LCD displays. I'm hope this is a defect (and Lenovo will replace it), and not a "feature" of the IDTech...
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
I did several searches, but I don't think I'm looking for the right terms. I see many threads about uneven backlighting or dark patches in screen corners, etc. but this isn't what I'm seeing on my display. My problem is definitely related to how the LCD handles a high-contrast transition, and how that results in vertical bands of slightly lighter shade. This definitely does not happen on my SXGA+ FlexView T60.Troels wrote:Taob,
Search the T4x forums... it's not considered a defect, but it seems to differ a lot on the Idtechs between the exact same type of panels.
I've seen this happen with some other newer panels too, though, these are neither for laptops OR IPS.
I suppose I can wait until the other 2623DDU arrives to see if it has the same problem. It's almost like the vertical banding problem you would see on the old dual-scan LCDs, though not quite that bad.
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
Yep, comin' right up... I was using the darkest grey patch in the standard Vista selection of solid colours, which corresponds to RGB (70,70,70).darrenf wrote:A photograph of the problem would go a long way to explaining it.
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=20286
I agree, it wasn't easy to find the thread... but that one was probably the most informative.
One more, which contains two pics:
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=9739
This is similar to what you see?
Edit:
But other than that i think you should definitely complain to Lenovo about the issues, if it's bothering you... i'm afraid this is the difference between the various numbers of the UXGA idtech screen revisions. There are 5 or so. That would probably explain why relatively few ever speak of it. Just a theory.
I agree, it wasn't easy to find the thread... but that one was probably the most informative.
One more, which contains two pics:
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=9739
This is similar to what you see?
Edit:
But other than that i think you should definitely complain to Lenovo about the issues, if it's bothering you... i'm afraid this is the difference between the various numbers of the UXGA idtech screen revisions. There are 5 or so. That would probably explain why relatively few ever speak of it. Just a theory.
Last edited by Troels on Tue May 01, 2007 9:15 am, edited 1 time in total.
Here is a link to a photo of the screen, with some annotation. It is definitely not a flare or reflection issue, or anything to do with the viewing conditions or camera lens (or the lens in your eye, for that matter
). The bands move around if you move the windows around. It seems to be a problem isolating a strong video signal to only the rows of pixels that should be lit up.
http://www.luxography.ca/Images/Other/i ... _notes.jpg (1000x1500 JPEG, 117K)
http://www.luxography.ca/Images/Other/i ... _notes.jpg (1000x1500 JPEG, 117K)
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
Aha, yes, those threads talk about the same issue I'm seeing here, Troels. The T60 15" SXGA+ panel definitely does not exhibit this problem, and I noticed it on the T60p almost as soon as I switched from Vista's default bright desktop background to something more to my tastes (e.g., dark
). I then switched to a solid colour to make sure I was seeing this correctly.
Aside from model differences, I suspect more people have not noticed because many people tend to run their windows full screen (or very close to it), and thus would not see the problem. It only comes up if you have both a dark background and a relatively narrow and tall bright white window.
Although I make my living with photography, I don't think this will be an issue in practice. If I will be showing off photos, it will be in "lights out" mode (i.e., no window decorations, dark background, no other distracting elements, etc.). However, it could be a problem if the photo itself has a bright foreground element in front of a dark background (e.g., backlit windows taken from inside a relatively dark room).
Hrm... I'll have to figure out what the real impact is, and decide whether it would be better to keep the T60 (no banding problem, but lower resolution and slower ATI adapter) or the T60p (higher res and faster ATI adapter, but has a banding problem).
Aside from model differences, I suspect more people have not noticed because many people tend to run their windows full screen (or very close to it), and thus would not see the problem. It only comes up if you have both a dark background and a relatively narrow and tall bright white window.
Although I make my living with photography, I don't think this will be an issue in practice. If I will be showing off photos, it will be in "lights out" mode (i.e., no window decorations, dark background, no other distracting elements, etc.). However, it could be a problem if the photo itself has a bright foreground element in front of a dark background (e.g., backlit windows taken from inside a relatively dark room).
Hrm... I'll have to figure out what the real impact is, and decide whether it would be better to keep the T60 (no banding problem, but lower resolution and slower ATI adapter) or the T60p (higher res and faster ATI adapter, but has a banding problem).
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
Hehe.. you could also take one for the team, buy a BOE-Hydis UXGA off ebay and put this in the other T60p you're awaiting, so we can get a head to head direct comparison
It's actually a weird issue. I have a SXGA+ idtech from a T42 with no echoes or banding. Part no. is N150P3-L01, but the UXGA i bought used, but arrived damaged, does have similar banding, but it doesn't look quite as severe though
.
It's actually a weird issue. I have a SXGA+ idtech from a T42 with no echoes or banding. Part no. is N150P3-L01, but the UXGA i bought used, but arrived damaged, does have similar banding, but it doesn't look quite as severe though
I only see one 15" UXGA BOE Hydis on eBay right now... anyone have C$800 to spare?

- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD
Can you compare/contrast/discuss the color reproduction capabilities of the IDTech UXGA vs the LG SXGA+? Is the LG more saturated? Which is brighter? Which has better viewing angles? Does the IDTech look brighter "straight on" than the LG? etc etctaob wrote:Anyway, I have it side-by-side with my 2623-K8U T60 with the 41W6707 15" SXGA+ FlexView, and there is a difference... I can't say which one is "better" yet
T60p 2613-CTO, 2.33GHz, 3GB ram, Intel 80gb G2 SSD, H7K 200GB/7200rpm, LG Flexview IPS SXGA+ screen, ATI FireGL V5250
Essential TP Hotfixes and Tweaks
Essential TP Hotfixes and Tweaks
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
Frankenpad T60p T9300 UXGA 9 cell 3GB RAM MAKE OFFER
by j.harris » Mon May 08, 2017 6:50 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 0 Replies
- 337 Views
-
Last post by j.harris
Mon May 08, 2017 6:50 pm
-
-
-
damaged LCD connector cable, need also new IPS panel
by PRAGUEGUY » Fri Dec 30, 2016 3:36 pm » in ThinkPad X230 and later Series - 7 Replies
- 849 Views
-
Last post by PRAGUEGUY
Thu Jan 12, 2017 10:15 am
-
-
-
Got a nice IPS x220t from ebay, realize I have Computrace woes now
by Digitalhorizons » Sun Jan 08, 2017 7:29 am » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 39 Replies
- 3855 Views
-
Last post by asgaard
Tue Jun 27, 2017 10:21 am
-
-
-
WTB: Converter cable for X60/X61 IPS swap.
by Surfrider » Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:06 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 0 Replies
- 271 Views
-
Last post by Surfrider
Fri Jan 27, 2017 1:06 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests






