T60p + Vista 64bit ~ 4GB installed -> only 3GB seen

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
Dimitri_P
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:26 pm
Location: • California •
Contact:

T60p + Vista 64bit ~ 4GB installed -> only 3GB seen

#1 Post by Dimitri_P » Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:37 pm

2 x 2GB RAM sticks installed,

BIOS shows 4GB, but when in Windows, it shows "3070 MB"

:(

Anybody has spare a T61p motherboard? :-D

Dimitri_P
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:26 pm
Location: • California •
Contact:

#2 Post by Dimitri_P » Sun Apr 15, 2007 5:43 pm

3GB installed, show same result [3070 MB]

ZPrime
Sophomore Member
Posts: 199
Joined: Tue Jul 06, 2004 10:57 pm
Location: Cleveland, OH

#3 Post by ZPrime » Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:05 pm

Vista Home 64bit? Or Biz?

64bit shouldn't have any issues with > 2 GB ram. XP 32bit has an artificial limitation at 3gb due to badly behaved 3rd party drivers, and I'd imagine they're carrying that to vista 32bit, but if you're running x64 that's definitely not right.

Did you install x64 yourself, or are you just using the preload? Vista preload on thinkpads is always 32bit.
New Biz: 4062-27U - W500 C2D T9600, 15.4" 1920x1200 (FireGL V5700), 160G 7200rpm, 4G PC3-8500, DVDRW, Intel 5100, BT, TurboMem, T60p KBD :)
Old Biz: 2613-CTO - T60p Core 2 T7200, 14" 1400x1050 (FireGL V5250), 100G 7200rpm, 3G PC2 5300, DVDRW, Intel a/g , BT

Dimitri_P
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:26 pm
Location: • California •
Contact:

#4 Post by Dimitri_P » Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:12 pm

It is 64bit Ultimate

dsalyers
Sophomore Member
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:52 pm
Location: Indiana, US

#5 Post by dsalyers » Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:46 pm

You can only see 3GB because the upper parts of the memory address space for the current Intel mobile chipsets is reserved for addressing devices (like the graphics card, ect.). It will not matter what OS you run, it is a hardware limitation of all Intel based laptops.

There is no way to fix this. The upcomming santa rosa chipset will be able to see 4GB+.

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#6 Post by pianowizard » Sun Apr 15, 2007 6:47 pm

Dimitri, thanks again for experimenting with your 2GB sticks. This is very helpful because the issue of whether the 64-bit versions of Vista can use all 4GB of RAM on these machines has been raised numerous times on this forum. We can now stop speculating or arguing.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

gt5l
Sophomore Member
Posts: 128
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 9:40 am
Location: Hershey, PA

#7 Post by gt5l » Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:28 pm

so if i understand this correctly, even though my laptop can take 2 2gb chips totalling 4gb the system can only see and use 3gb?
IBM T60p 2613HQU- 2.33 GHz T7600, 2GB RAM, 100GB 7200 HD, 14" LCD SXGA+ TFT, 256MB ATI FireGL V5250, CDRW/DVDRW
Intel 802.11abg wireless, Fingerprint, BT, and Vista Ult.
#1 Laptop

ryengineer
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4393
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.

#8 Post by ryengineer » Sun Apr 15, 2007 7:35 pm

gt5l wrote:so if i understand this correctly, even though my laptop can take 2 2gb chips totalling 4gb the system can only see and use 3gb?
Correct, that's due to intel's chipset limitation.

This topic has been discussed many many times , please see:

http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... ht=#271409
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.

Johan
Moderator1
Moderator1
Posts: 1978
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:00 pm
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

#9 Post by Johan » Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:31 am

This information is also on the T60 datasheet; see e.g. http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.w ... ersion=yes

- where it is expressed like this: "Important information about memory: On the T60 and T60p systems, even though it is possible to physically install 4 GB of memory, the actual amount of memory addressable by an operating system will be limited to 3 GB. This limitation comes from the current 32-bit PC architecture."

Johan
IBM T42p's (2373-Q1U & -Q2U): 2.1 GHz, 15" UXGA FlexView, 2 GB RAM, 128 MB FireGL T2, 128 GB 1.8" SATA SSD, IBM a/b/g, BT, Win 7 Ultimate
IBM T42 (2373-N1G): 1.8 GHz, 15" SXGA+ FlexView, 2 GB RAM, 64 MB Radeon 9600, 64 GB 1.8" SATA SSD, IBM a/b/g, BT, Win 7 Ultimate

Dimitri_P
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 3:26 pm
Location: • California •
Contact:

#10 Post by Dimitri_P » Mon Apr 16, 2007 12:33 am

Johan wrote:This information is also on the T60 datasheet; see e.g. http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/OIX.w ... ersion=yes

- where it is expressed like this: "Important information about memory: On the T60 and T60p systems, even though it is possible to physically install 4 GB of memory, the actual amount of memory addressable by an operating system will be limited to 3 GB. This limitation comes from the current 32-bit PC architecture."

Johan
That is why I used 64bit OS....

Still same , not mentioned

taob
Sophomore Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

#11 Post by taob » Mon Apr 16, 2007 1:32 am

Dimitri_P wrote:That is why I used 64bit OS....
Your OS is 64-bit, your CPU is 64-bit... however the reserved memory locations imposed by the chipset are still in that space between 3.25 GB and 4.00 GB (roughly). If it were possible to have 4GB SO-DIMMs, I wonder if you would then be able to see memory between 4 GB and 8 GB with the current chipsets???

There's a great series of articles about this and the Windows "/3GB" switch here:

http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archi ... 18527.aspx
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD

dsalyers
Sophomore Member
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Nov 13, 2006 1:52 pm
Location: Indiana, US

#12 Post by dsalyers » Mon Apr 16, 2007 6:54 am

taob wrote:
Dimitri_P wrote:That is why I used 64bit OS....
Your OS is 64-bit, your CPU is 64-bit... however the reserved memory locations imposed by the chipset are still in that space between 3.25 GB and 4.00 GB (roughly). If it were possible to have 4GB SO-DIMMs, I wonder if you would then be able to see memory between 4 GB and 8 GB with the current chipsets???
If for some reason you could get 4GB DIMMs and they could be installed in the current laptops, you still would not be able to see anything above 3GB. It has to do with the way addresses are decoded by the intel mobile chipset. The intel mobile chipset only uses a 32bit address space (which is 4GB), the upper part of which is reserved.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests