1.86 Yonah or 1.66 Merom

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
rscosworth
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

1.86 Yonah or 1.66 Merom

#1 Post by rscosworth » Thu May 03, 2007 10:22 am

Guys,

Got the chance to buy a 1.66 merom at a knock down price.

Im currently running a 1.86 yonah with vista home premium.

Will be loading ultimate on in a couple of days; the question is, should i buy the merom or not?

Cheers
-------------------------
7665-B68, T7100 1.8Ghz, 2GB 5300, 100GB 7200rpm, 1440x990, Nvidia 140, Ultimate x32 (x64 dont like my network printer!!)

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#2 Post by dr_st » Thu May 03, 2007 10:39 am

Unless you're going to install a 64-bit OS - no.

rscosworth
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 12:35 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

#3 Post by rscosworth » Thu May 03, 2007 10:48 am

well i have vista 64bit cd, not sure if i would use it though.
-------------------------
7665-B68, T7100 1.8Ghz, 2GB 5300, 100GB 7200rpm, 1440x990, Nvidia 140, Ultimate x32 (x64 dont like my network printer!!)

kkposh
Posts: 30
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 6:41 am
Location: Beijing,China

#4 Post by kkposh » Thu May 03, 2007 11:04 am

In my opinion,there is little difference in performance.

the only difference is:

the merom supports 64-bit technology.
the T2400 yonah supports Intel Visualization Technology.

which technology is useful to you?
It's better to burn out than to fade away.

gator
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:28 am
Location: Gainesville, FL

#5 Post by gator » Thu May 03, 2007 1:22 pm

There is very little performance gain from Yonah to Merom on normal applications and day-to-day use. The difference is visible only on intensive 3D apps, that too when run for a long duration. I ran an extensive test using my really long matlab code and there was barely any difference.

Unless you are getting the Merom chip at a really low price, or you plan to sell the T60 later on, don't bother getting it.
Now: T60 2613-EKU | T23 2647-9NU | 600X 2645-9FU | HP 100LX
Past: X31 2673-Y13 | T41 2374-3HU | T22 2647-AEU


Rules of the road :thumbs-UP:

Troels
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

#6 Post by Troels » Thu May 03, 2007 3:15 pm

Matlab still only support single core CPUs and doesn't support multi-threading the two cores at once?

gator
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:28 am
Location: Gainesville, FL

#7 Post by gator » Thu May 03, 2007 3:29 pm

Troels wrote:Matlab still only support single core CPUs and doesn't support multi-threading the two cores at once?
Matlab has support for multi-threading since atleast version 6. I use matlab 7 and it uses both the cores.
Now: T60 2613-EKU | T23 2647-9NU | 600X 2645-9FU | HP 100LX
Past: X31 2673-Y13 | T41 2374-3HU | T22 2647-AEU


Rules of the road :thumbs-UP:

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#8 Post by dr_st » Thu May 03, 2007 3:38 pm

gator wrote:I use matlab 7 and it uses both the cores.
Hopefully it compensates slightly for MATLAB7 being a bloated slow piece of crap.

[/offtopic]

gator
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3401
Joined: Thu Aug 17, 2006 2:28 am
Location: Gainesville, FL

#9 Post by gator » Thu May 03, 2007 4:23 pm

dr_st wrote:Hopefully it compensates slightly for MATLAB7 being a bloated slow piece of crap.
[/offtopic]
It is not that bad, the graphics features are lots better than 5 and 6. But yeah, it does take some resources. I tried using GNU Octave, and it is awesome for opensource. It is almost identical to MATLAB and there are tons of custom packages available. Have you tried it?
Now: T60 2613-EKU | T23 2647-9NU | 600X 2645-9FU | HP 100LX
Past: X31 2673-Y13 | T41 2374-3HU | T22 2647-AEU


Rules of the road :thumbs-UP:

codek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 286
Joined: Mon Jun 05, 2006 4:41 am
Location: Los Angeles

#10 Post by codek » Fri May 04, 2007 12:06 am

dr_st wrote:
gator wrote:I use matlab 7 and it uses both the cores.
Hopefully it compensates slightly for MATLAB7 being a bloated slow piece of crap.

[/offtopic]
what do you mean

dr_st
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 6657
Joined: Sat Oct 29, 2005 6:20 am

#11 Post by dr_st » Fri May 04, 2007 7:45 am

codek wrote:what do you mean
I mean that it takes it like 2 minutes to load up, and 5-10 seconds to respond to simple commands, such as "help svmclassify", when you run them the first time (after that it seems to work fine). Also, the UI underwent some dumb changes (Ctrl+Tab no longer works in the editor to switch files, WTF?), and trackpoint scrolling doesn't work as well.

I do agree that the graphical functions have been improved, and I like some features of the new online debugger too, although some of them are dumb, like "variable appears to never be used" inside multi-function GUI .M files.

I haven't tried Octave, gator. All around, I'm pretty satisfied with MATLAB. It's just that MATLAB7 really got on my nerves by some UI/speed-crippling decisions, that seemingly are justified by nothing.

brentpresley
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1434
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 4:19 pm
Location: Dallas, TX
Contact:

#12 Post by brentpresley » Fri May 04, 2007 8:48 am

Back to topic:

Get the Merom. Merom is about 15% faster clock for clock than Yonah. Taking that into account, the Merom at 1.66 edges out the 1.8 Yonah in terms of speed.
Custom T60p
2.33GHz 4MB 667MHz Core 2 Duo
4GB PC2-5300 DDR SDRAM
Bluetooth / Atheros ABGN
200GB 7k200 7200RPM Hard Drive
8X DVD Multiburner
15" UXGA - ATI FireGL V5250 (256MB)

http://www.xcpus.com

Post Reply

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigT0ny, toarsapada and 9 guests