Comparions of WSXGA+ & WSXGA screens.

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
psirgany
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:32 pm

Comparions of WSXGA+ & WSXGA screens.

#1 Post by psirgany » Wed May 23, 2007 1:10 pm

I need to replace a T42P with the UXGA Flexview screen that was alas stolen <sympathy here :cry: >.

Given that the FV displays are no longer available through Lenevo (can be found on eBay) and after much reading and investigation I've become fairly sure that the FV screen is the way to go. However I have not been able to personally see the WSXGA+. screen. The WSXGA can be found at Circuit City and Staples - it does not IMHO compare to the FV display from the T42P.

Has anyone seen the WSXGA and the WSXGA+ side by side? How do they compare?

Thank you for your insight.

Paul

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#2 Post by pianowizard » Wed May 23, 2007 1:19 pm

Please clarify the nomenclature for us. Let's first consider the difference between SXGA and SXGA+:

SXGA = 1280x1024 or 1280x960 (usually the former)
SXGA+ = 1400x1050

So, the plus sign simply denotes more pixels. Now, the prefix "W" means widescreen, and thus WSXGA+ has more columns of pixels than SXGA+, i.e. 1680x1050. I've never heard of a widescreen version of SXGA, i.e. WSXGA doesn't exist.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

taob
Sophomore Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

#3 Post by taob » Wed May 23, 2007 1:31 pm

Maybe "WSXGA" = 1280x800? It would be an anomaly in an otherwise fairly linear progression of sizes. :lol:
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD

skuff
Posts: 16
Joined: Fri Jan 06, 2006 4:17 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

#4 Post by skuff » Wed May 23, 2007 1:36 pm

I have never seen a "WSXGA"
1280x800 is usually denoted as WXGA I believe
1440x900 is WXGA+

Further confusion (I mean clarification, hehehe) can be found here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_display_standard

taob
Sophomore Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

#5 Post by taob » Wed May 23, 2007 1:41 pm

Personally, I find it easier and less confusing just to quote the [censored] pixel dimensions and be done with it. :lol:
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD

TPA
Posts: 34
Joined: Mon May 21, 2007 8:52 am
Location: Beaumont, Texas

#6 Post by TPA » Wed May 23, 2007 2:13 pm

lenovo will allow you to configure a 15" flexview t60, but it's not uxga:




Display type
---15.0 XGA TFT
---15.0 SXGA+ TFT Flexview Display with Wide Viewing Angle [add $187.50]
Thinkpad T60p T7200...blah....blah...blah

psirgany
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:32 pm

#7 Post by psirgany » Wed May 23, 2007 2:51 pm

WSXGA = 15.4" TFT (1280x800)
WSXGA+ = 15.4" TFT (1680x1050)

FlexView Displays were
SXGA+ = 15" (1400 x 1050)
UXGA = 15" (1600 x 1200)

You can indeed configure the 4:3 (1400 x 1050) FlexView display on the stardard T60 but not on the T60P. Via phone Lenovo does will commit to delivery.

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#8 Post by pianowizard » Wed May 23, 2007 3:02 pm

psirgany wrote:WSXGA = 15.4" TFT (1280x800)
WSXGA+ = 15.4" TFT (1680x1050)
Thanks for clarifying. The only difference between 1280x800 (i.e. WXGA) and 1680x1050 is that the latter has 72% more pixels, so that you have 72% more real estate, although the same objects will appear 72% smaller on the 1680x1050 screen. In terms of contrast, viewing angle, color depth etc., the two screens will be identical, or, as Puppy would put it, both screens are equally "crappy". Oh, also, the 1680x1050 screen might be slightly thicker and heavier, and it might consume more power (i.e. shorter battery life).
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

psirgany
Posts: 11
Joined: Sun Jan 01, 2006 12:32 pm

#9 Post by psirgany » Wed May 23, 2007 6:43 pm

It does seem as noted elsewhere in this forum that laptop screens from all manufacturers have suffered as the prices have been driven down and screen production affected by TV sales.

It is sometimes unfortunate that the constant push to lower prices results in lesser products. Lenovo does seem to be holding theline a quality where possible.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Thinkpad4by3 and 5 guests