Graphics speed test of cards in the Advanced Dock
Posted: Sun May 27, 2007 2:31 am
I tested two different cards in the Advanced Dock with a T60p to see which would be faster, and compared to the built-in graphics chip with the panel display. I used PassMark Performance Test (does anyone know of something better to use?)
Test of FireGL V5200
Test of Lenovo X1300LE
Test of BFG Tech Nvidia GeForce 7600GS
The results are mixed - the built-in display is significantly faster on almost all the tests, except for the line-drawing test and the GUI test when it is only a tad faster. (I am driving two analog 24" external monitors, both at 1920x1200.)
I expected the BFG card to be faster than the Lenovo X1300LE (it's a full-size card, built for gaming, and is overclocked, while the Lenovo card is a special low-power edition made specially for the Advanced Dock), but it is only faster on some tests, and seems slower overall - that's a surprise.
I decided to go with the Lenovo X1300LE in my system (I was expecting to go with the BFG). Although it has a fan, and the BFG is passive-cooled with no fan, the fan on it is REALLY quiet. I can hardly hear it at all. I have disabled the two Advanced Dock fans and so basically my Advanced Dock is now noiseless, even with this card installed (and its fan running - that one fan should be sufficient). (When I did this with the BFG card installed, it got very hot - over 105 degrees. I didn't like that.)
The other big advantage for me is that it is officially supported in the Advanced Dock, and there doesn't seem to be any problem running the Thinkpad display alongside two external displays off the card at the same time - I couldn't do this with the BFG GeForce 6700 card, there was always a conflict and blue screens.
The same Catalyst interface works with both display drivers at the same time.
Test of FireGL V5200
Test of Lenovo X1300LE
Test of BFG Tech Nvidia GeForce 7600GS
The results are mixed - the built-in display is significantly faster on almost all the tests, except for the line-drawing test and the GUI test when it is only a tad faster. (I am driving two analog 24" external monitors, both at 1920x1200.)
I expected the BFG card to be faster than the Lenovo X1300LE (it's a full-size card, built for gaming, and is overclocked, while the Lenovo card is a special low-power edition made specially for the Advanced Dock), but it is only faster on some tests, and seems slower overall - that's a surprise.
I decided to go with the Lenovo X1300LE in my system (I was expecting to go with the BFG). Although it has a fan, and the BFG is passive-cooled with no fan, the fan on it is REALLY quiet. I can hardly hear it at all. I have disabled the two Advanced Dock fans and so basically my Advanced Dock is now noiseless, even with this card installed (and its fan running - that one fan should be sufficient). (When I did this with the BFG card installed, it got very hot - over 105 degrees. I didn't like that.)
The other big advantage for me is that it is officially supported in the Advanced Dock, and there doesn't seem to be any problem running the Thinkpad display alongside two external displays off the card at the same time - I couldn't do this with the BFG GeForce 6700 card, there was always a conflict and blue screens.
The same Catalyst interface works with both display drivers at the same time.