Can a SATA 3 Gb/s be used in a T60P?

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
steveg47
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Northern NJ

Can a SATA 3 Gb/s be used in a T60P?

#1 Post by steveg47 » Tue Jul 17, 2007 1:16 pm

As I understand it sata and sata II are supposed to be backward and forward compatible. Since the Hitachi 7k200 200gb drive comes in both SATA 1.5 Gbit/s and SATA 3.0 Gbit/s models and the prices are essentially the same why would anyone order the SATA 1.5 Gbit/s interface. Is there something I'm missing here? Also, can someone clarify if the T60P sata interface 1.5 or 3.0??
I'm ordering a 7K200 and would sure like to get it right the first time :)
TIA.
X220(Win8.1pro)~T60p~X100e(Win8pro)~S10~X31~X40~T42~T43~560X~600X

tebore
Freshman Member
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 11:09 pm
Location: Toronto, Canada

#2 Post by tebore » Tue Jul 17, 2007 3:02 pm

A T60p has SATA2 so it can use the 3Gbps transfer rate.
T60P 2623-D8U

erik
moderator
moderator
Posts: 3596
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Location: United States

#3 Post by erik » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:26 pm

according to the 7K200 datasheet, transfer speeds are identical for the SATA 3 and 1.5 GB/sec models.   even though the T60/T61 support SATA2, do they support throughput above 1.5 GBPS?
ThinkStation P700 · C20 | ThinkPad P40 · 600

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#4 Post by tomh009 » Tue Jul 17, 2007 7:40 pm

... and SATA 3 Gb/s (the official name) will gain you a grand total of 50 ms whenever the 16 MB disk buffer has been pre-filled and Windows asks for exactly the same data from the buffer.

Emptying the buffer takes 100 ms at 1.5 Gb/s, 50 ms at 3.0 Gb/s. After that you are down to the usual off-media transfer rate of maybe 800 Mb/s, regardless of which disk interface you are using.
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

erik
moderator
moderator
Posts: 3596
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 12:52 pm
Location: United States

#5 Post by erik » Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:00 pm

sounds like it's not worth waiting for the 3 GB/s version to become available.   thanks! :)
ThinkStation P700 · C20 | ThinkPad P40 · 600

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

Re: Can a SATA 3 Gb/s be used in a T60P?

#6 Post by tomh009 » Tue Jul 17, 2007 8:12 pm

steveg47 wrote:Since the Hitachi 7k200 200gb drive comes in both SATA 1.5 Gbit/s and SATA 3.0 Gbit/s models and the prices are essentially the same why would anyone order the SATA 1.5 Gbit/s interface.
Some older VIA and SiS 1.5 Gb/s SATA chipsets did not correctly deal with the autonegotiation with 3 Gb/s SATA devices, so for those you need a device hardwired to 1.5 Gb/s.

And as I pointed out in my other post, the interface speed will not make any perceivable difference in real life ...
X220 (4287-2W5, Windows 8 Pro) / X31 (2672-CXU, XP Pro) / X61s (7668-CTO, Windows 8 Pro)

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#7 Post by hoya » Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:59 pm

fwiw, I'm am successfully using a Seagate Momentus 7200.2 with the pin removed which enables the 3.0gb/s speed and it works perfectly.

I'm now thinking of going for the Hitachi 7K200 after reading this review:
http://www.barefeats.com/rosa05.html

kulivontot
Sophomore Member
Posts: 232
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 9:01 pm

#8 Post by kulivontot » Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 am

Who cares? neither SATA 1.5 nor 3.0 gbps is even CLOSE to being saturated with hdd transfer speeds. Even for desktop hard drives it is usually a moot point. I wouldn't worry about it.

steveg47
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 723
Joined: Wed Sep 13, 2006 11:11 am
Location: Northern NJ

#9 Post by steveg47 » Wed Jul 18, 2007 9:19 am

Ok.
To sum up:

1) If price and availability are equal, the only reason to purchase a sata 1.5 over a 3.0 drive is for backward compatibility on some older chipsets.
2) Performance differences between 1.5 and 3.0 will be negligible.
3) T60/p has a sata II (3.0) interface and will accept both interfaces.

Conclusion: I will be buying a HITACHI Travelstar 7K200 HTS722020K9SA00 (sata 1.5) which is available now.

Thanks all for your input. :D
X220(Win8.1pro)~T60p~X100e(Win8pro)~S10~X31~X40~T42~T43~560X~600X

hoya
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 670
Joined: Fri Aug 05, 2005 8:01 pm
Location: Washington, DC

#10 Post by hoya » Thu Jul 19, 2007 5:24 am

check this page of a review of the Seagate 7200.2 which notes that only one benchmark was affected by removing the pin to enable 3.0gb/s transfer speeds.

http://www.bigbruin.com/2007/momentus7200_3

a person on this thread tested the same and found no difference on his laptop but he did notice a difference in one benchmark on his desktop:
http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=133213

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests