Page 1 of 1
ATI Mobility FireGL V5250 256M VS nVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256M
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 12:53 pm
by mr_haze123
Hi,
I'm trying to find a comparison benchmark between these 2 cards but I've been unsuccessful so far...I wanna play game like Far Cry and stuff like this.
Anyone can help?
Thanks a lot!
Mat Del
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 1:14 pm
by sktn77a
Well, neither are gaming GPUs but, having said that, I got some pretty good performance with the Radeon 9600 in my T42.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:20 pm
by Pascal_TTH
Both are powerfull enough to run FarCry.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:25 pm
by mr_haze123
still...which one is better?
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 2:58 pm
by Pascal_TTH
Witch Quadro do you speak about ? NVS 140m is a bit less powerfull then FireGL V5200. Quadro FX 570m is about two time more powerfull then the Quadro NVS 140m.
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:01 pm
by mr_haze123
nVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256 Mb
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 3:50 pm
by Pascal_TTH
mr_haze123 wrote:nVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 256 Mb
So, what I tell before is right.
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 7:54 am
by mr_haze123
alright, thanks a lot guys; I appreciate!
Posted: Wed Aug 08, 2007 3:17 pm
by Pascal_TTH
Here is a link to my 3D Mark 2005 laptops database :
http://forum.tt-hardware.com/topic-8173 ... t-2005.htm
3D Mark 2005 is a graphic benchmark witch show a GPU performs in common games. The chart is : laptop, processor, graphic, 3D Mark 2005 score. Higher is better and better ones are at the top.
Posted: Wed Aug 15, 2007 4:36 am
by Esben
I believe 3DMark measures performance by testing the shader units in the 3d-card, where the Quadro has much faster shader units.
Far Cry on the other hand is an older game, which means it's more fill-rate dependant. Both cards should run the game well.
If I had the choice between the two, the V5250 would have to be greatly discounted for me in order choose that one.
The Quadro 570M (8600M GT) is more future proof, and has higher performance overall.
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 11:26 am
by Kamika007z
What stinks is that you can only get a 128MB version of the nVidia Quadro FX 570M when configuring the T61p 14.1" variant.
While my T60p 14.1" has a ATi FireGL V5200 256MB flavor.
Does anyone know if the 128MB nVidia card
still beats the 256MB ATi card?
Thanks in advance.
Posted: Sun Aug 26, 2007 3:37 pm
by Pascal_TTH
I know : yes ! There is other files about this. Some one post some benchmarks.
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 12:15 pm
by Kamika007z
Any benchmarks for the 256MB version and the 128MB version for comparison would be great!
Thanks!
Posted: Mon Aug 27, 2007 3:38 pm
by Pascal_TTH
Kamika007z wrote:Any benchmarks for the 256MB version and the 128MB version for comparison would be great!
Thanks!
About 3300 at 3D Mark 2006 for 256 MB and 2300 for the 128 MB.
This file :
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.php?t=48346
Posted: Tue Aug 28, 2007 11:26 pm
by codek
Pascal_TTH wrote:Here is a link to my 3D Mark 2005 laptops database :
http://forum.tt-hardware.com/topic-8173 ... t-2005.htm
3D Mark 2005 is a graphic benchmark witch show a GPU performs in common games. The chart is : laptop, processor, graphic, 3D Mark 2005 score. Higher is better and better ones are at the top.
the quadro 570m (256) really got a 7500 on 3dmark05?
Posted: Wed Aug 29, 2007 10:11 am
by Pascal_TTH
codek wrote:Pascal_TTH wrote:Here is a link to my 3D Mark 2005 laptops database :
http://forum.tt-hardware.com/topic-8173 ... t-2005.htm
3D Mark 2005 is a graphic benchmark witch show a GPU performs in common games. The chart is : laptop, processor, graphic, 3D Mark 2005 score. Higher is better and better ones are at the top.
the quadro 570m (256) really got a 7500 on 3dmark05?
Yes, someone post it in this forum. Also see same kind of result in other forums.