Are the T6x screens better than T4x screens ?

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

Are the T6x screens better than T4x screens ?

#1 Post by wearetheborg » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:36 am

I just bought a used T42, and its screen (SXGA+) sucks. Viewing angles are horrible, and constrast is not that great.
My Dell M90 WUXGA screen blows it away, SO much better.

Are the newer T6x screens better ?
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

Kyocera
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4826
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:00 pm
Location: North Carolina, ...in my mind I'm going to Carolina.....
Contact:

#2 Post by Kyocera » Tue Aug 14, 2007 10:41 am

Yes, they are way better, I don't know why but they just are, even though they're the same screen, maybe it's because the t60 cost's more so yeah that's probably it, anything that costs more is way better. :lol:

pipspeak
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 496
Joined: Tue May 11, 2004 12:32 pm
Location: San Francisco

#3 Post by pipspeak » Tue Aug 14, 2007 11:43 am

The T61 SXGA+ screen is a lot brighter than my T43 SXGA+ screen but viewing angles are just as bad (particularly vertical) and light leakage at the bottom of the screen is just as bad.
570 --> T20 --> T40 --> T43 --> T61 (4:3) --> T400 -->T420 --> T440p + X240

ocellaris
Freshman Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine

#4 Post by ocellaris » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:06 pm

Is the light leakage bad? I am using a Vostro 1400 with a glossy screen, the light leakage from the bottom is horrible. There is no viewing angle on the laptop where the bottom of the screen colors are not washed out. The has bothered me to the point that I ordered a T61 14 inch WXGA wide to use instead. If the screen is going to be bad, I might have to start looking at HP :cry:

SHoTTa35
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1597
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: Wash, DC
Contact:

Re: Are the T6x screens better than T4x screens ?

#5 Post by SHoTTa35 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:10 pm

wearetheborg wrote:I just bought a used T42, and its screen (SXGA+) sucks. Viewing angles are horrible, and constrast is not that great.
My Dell M90 WUXGA screen blows it away, SO much better.

Are the newer T6x screens better ?
seriously? you're gonna compare your new shiny wide UXGA LCD to a 3-4yr old SXGA+ screen? Seriously?

I can't say how much better the T6x screens are but i sure hope they are somewhat better since 3-4yrs should have given them some time to better their techonolgy.

Also note that Thinkpad screens haven't been the best in all reality. You can get better screens on other machines that are all glossy and look great but Thinkpads generally come with lower screens unless you get an IPS/Flexview one.
Current - Thinkpad T410si - Core i3 330m, 4GB, 250GB 5400RPM, WXGA+, FPR, BT, Camera, DVDRW, Gobi2000, Win7 Pro x32
Past - Thinkpad T410 - T400 - T61 - T60 - T43 - T42 - T41 - T40 - T23 - 600X

ocellaris
Freshman Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine

#6 Post by ocellaris » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:31 pm

Just to give you an idea of what I am trying to improve upon... These are not my pics, however my Dell shows the same results:

Image

Image

If the T61 screen has a chance of coming out that bad, I am going to have to cancel :cry:

Kyocera
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4826
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2005 8:00 pm
Location: North Carolina, ...in my mind I'm going to Carolina.....
Contact:

#7 Post by Kyocera » Tue Aug 14, 2007 12:45 pm

ocellaris, a friend of mine bought a vostro and I have to say the quality is pretty bad overall, is that your impression?

A FOUR cell battery on the basic model. :lol

Your pictures aren't working, try again.

There is no way a t61 can even compare to a vostro from what I've seen, so don't throw the baby out with the bathwater yet, give it a chance. The vostro I got my hands on was a complete joke, and can't even be compared in ANY way to a thinkpad at any level.

SHoTTa35
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1597
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 6:20 pm
Location: Wash, DC
Contact:

#8 Post by SHoTTa35 » Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:29 pm

well i saw the pics by opening them in another page:

http://www.bigempty.org/pics/vosbl2.jpg
http://www.bigempty.org/pics/vosbl3.jpg

I think he's talking about LCD light bleed from the bottom. I have not so much experience with that but as far as i know it's almost kinda universal to all LCDs because of their inherent backlight that they all use.
Current - Thinkpad T410si - Core i3 330m, 4GB, 250GB 5400RPM, WXGA+, FPR, BT, Camera, DVDRW, Gobi2000, Win7 Pro x32
Past - Thinkpad T410 - T400 - T61 - T60 - T43 - T42 - T41 - T40 - T23 - 600X

ocellaris
Freshman Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine

#9 Post by ocellaris » Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:39 pm

Sorry the pics do not work. You can find the pics along with other examples over here:

http://forum.notebookreview.com/showthread.php?t=154906

The Vostro featues and performance were definitely good for the price. Its definitely not junk and feels more solid than anything in the price range, however its also not something I was too keen on putting in a bag and travelling with daily. My main problem with the Vostro 1400 is the screen light leakage at the bottom. It washes out all the colors I can not bring myself to not notice it. I was going to send the laptop back and try another one in a few weeks, however my wife staked a claim on the laptop and she is keeping it now.

I ordered a T61 with a DVD burner and Nvidia 140, everything else is minimum configuration to keep the price down (T7100, Home Basic, 1GB 1 DIMM, no Bluetooth, no webcam, 4 cell, $909 + tax).

ocellaris
Freshman Member
Posts: 73
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Lisbon Falls, Maine

#10 Post by ocellaris » Tue Aug 14, 2007 1:42 pm

I have not so much experience with that but as far as i know it's almost kinda universal to all LCDs because of their inherent backlight that they all use.
Yeah some is common, maybe noticable in a dark room with the screen blacked, however the ammount I am getting on the Vostro 1400 is definitely outside of what I consider acceptable. I have a MacBook Pro and probably ~5 other laptops at work that I use off and on, only the Vostro has leakage this bad. A lot of people with the 1400 have been having the problem, mostly with LG screens.

wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

Re: Are the T6x screens better than T4x screens ?

#11 Post by wearetheborg » Tue Aug 14, 2007 4:57 pm

SHoTTa35 wrote:
seriously? you're gonna compare your new shiny wide UXGA LCD to a 3-4yr old SXGA+ screen? Seriously?

.
Its not new. Both are rougly a year old. The T42 has a april 2006 label on it, the M90 was made in June 2006.
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

#12 Post by wearetheborg » Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:26 am

I saw a brand new T61 14" wxga+ today. It had the worst screen I've ever seen. Crazy amount of backlight bleeding.

Someone mentioned in the other forum that this is the nature of the 14" segment ? I know that the dell d620 (14") also had a really crappy screen.
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 17 guests