I saw a T61 and I'm highly Disappointed

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

I saw a T61 and I'm highly Disappointed

#1 Post by wearetheborg » Thu Aug 16, 2007 2:10 am

The 14" WXGA+ screen was really bad - I havent seen this much backlight bleeding.
The lid was also creaking when pressed right at the edge (at both sides).

Otherwise it seemed solid, but man the screen sucks. The used SXGA+ screen on my T42 is MUCH better :flame: :flame:

What is it with these screens ?
I have seen
T61, 14" wxga+ : the worst
T42, 14" sxga+: bad, contrast ratio very low
T30, 14" sxga+: bad, contrast ratio very low
Dell Inspiron 1505 15.4" WXGA: bad, contrast ratio very low, some light bleeding
Sony Vaio (6 years old) XGA: Fantastic lcd
Dell Inspiron 5 years old 15" UXGA: Good, contrast ratio can be improved.
Dell Precision M90 17" WUXGA : STUNNING, high contrast ratio, minimal bleeding, very good viewing angles.


Has the lcd quality gone down in the 14-15" segment ?
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

Pepa
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Prague, Czech

#2 Post by Pepa » Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:16 am

Quality is not gone completly, but pressure for price significantly lowered it. With fall of Thinkpads with IPS screens is world even more darker.

TBH you cannot compare mobile 17" with 2+ lamps with any <15" with 1 lamp. And Vaio laptop LCDs are well-known for their quality, but they are glare (so multimedia-style by many companys) and not so much comparable.

Im fine with mine laptop LCD LP154WU1-A1K6 - 15,4" WUXGA with 600:1 contrast ratio (ThinkPad Z61p).
Z61p (0674GEG) - C2D T7200, 3GB RAM, 15,4" WUXGA, ATI FGL V5250, 100GB 7k2, Win VB

Troels
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

#3 Post by Troels » Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:07 am

It's sometimes just a draw of the luck. However, regardless of lamps it can have bad screen uniformity - at least for desktop LCDs.

I don't see much of the claimed goodness of LED backlit displays either - sure it's bright, but from measurements the screen uniformity can be even worse than the worst LCDs - see the review of the MBP on notebookcheck.

I'm surprised that the WXGA+ should have lower screen quality than the 14" SXGA+.
There are also different quality levels between LCD panels, but mostly when it comes to standard resolution LCDs - since high resolution LCDs is a niche product.
It would be nice if you could throw a flexview into that comparison :D

wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

#4 Post by wearetheborg » Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:17 am

Troels wrote:
I'm surprised that the WXGA+ should have lower screen quality than the 14" SXGA+.
Why is this surprising ?


I'd love to see a flexview screen.

Do the 15.4" lcds have one lamp or two ?

Does black being really black depend on the number of lamps ? Yes the WUXGA on the dell is "truelife" too, but its really nice (I use it mainl for programming)

Also, I've seen the trend that higher resolution screens have higher contrast ratios. Is there a correlation ? In that higher resolution => better quality in general ?
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

Troels
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1017
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2005 2:55 pm
Location: Aalborg, Denmark

#5 Post by Troels » Thu Aug 16, 2007 5:49 am

Surprising because the contrast ratio ought to be 300:1 vs. 200:1 on the 14" SXGA+.

I've never heard of a laptop LCD which has more than one lamp, which is due to the extra space an inverter needs and the power draw (about 4W). But it's likely they use more for the 17" screens.

The black levels depend on the uniformity of the reflector layer and on how well the CCFL tube is alligned in the bottom of the LCD panel. Unless you buy one of those desktop monitors with 8 CCFLs for photo work, there always should be some lack of uniformity.

Manufacturers make mirror-finish LCDs because this will hide the differences in black levels a little, so it will be harder to notice the lightness of the black or it's uniformity.

It's my guess that high resolution screens are manufactured to higher standards since there are considerably less sales, so:

a) the manufacturer must try to make a larger market for these LCDs by really making consistent quality and great performing high resolution LCDs.

b) There's no rush making these displays since the sales are so low.

sugo
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1813
Joined: Thu May 27, 2004 11:54 am
Location: Seattle, WA

#6 Post by sugo » Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:53 am

Would you have FRU info so that we know which manufacturer's LCD is bad? My 14.1" IDTech SXGA+ T42 screen isn't very bright but it's usable.
X61

wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

#7 Post by wearetheborg » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:48 am

sugo wrote:Would you have FRU info so that we know which manufacturer's LCD is bad? My 14.1" IDTech SXGA+ T42 screen isn't very bright but it's usable.
Er, how do I get the FRU number ?
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

#8 Post by wearetheborg » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:29 am

Troels wrote:Surprising because the contrast ratio ought to be 300:1 vs. 200:1 on the 14" SXGA+.
.
Now that you mention it, the contrast ratio wasnt that bad, it was just that the wxga+ had horrible backlight bleeding, and that was spoiling the black background (I like dark colors). I think a blue or light background would look decent on that screen.
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

ducky2802
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 306
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 11:16 am
Location: San Diego, CA

#9 Post by ducky2802 » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:54 am

Im pretty sure my vaio fs (15.4" wxga) has two ccfls. It is even brighter than a couple of external LCD monitors I have used.

jonnylaw
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:48 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

#10 Post by jonnylaw » Thu Aug 16, 2007 11:22 am

LG is the only manufacturer of the 14 ws for the t61. I have one and I don't think its that bad. Very bright and only leakage from bottom during startup

carbon_unit
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: South Central Iowa, USA

#11 Post by carbon_unit » Thu Aug 16, 2007 1:42 pm

Exactly which T61did you look at? There are many different models and options.
Are you comparing a $1000.00 T61 to a $2000.00 Dell? Is that fair?
T60 2623-D7U, 3 GB Ram.
Dual boot XP and Linux Mint.
Registered linux user #160145

wearetheborg
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 569
Joined: Sun Oct 22, 2006 1:12 am
Location: San Pablo, California

#12 Post by wearetheborg » Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:43 pm

carbon_unit wrote:Exactly which T61did you look at? There are many different models and options.
Are you comparing a $1000.00 T61 to a $2000.00 Dell? Is that fair?
Model: 7663-ITU
And I've included a dell inspiron 15" in my comparison (I believe it was the inspiron 8200), how is that comparing in different classes ? If anything, the inpsiron belongs in a lower class. It weighs like 10 pounds :mrgreen:

Oh, and dell uses the same screens in all their 17" (inlcuding inspirons). I've seen an inspiron 17" ($1200), WUXGA, and it was stunning too.
HP NC8000 UXGA; Dell Precision M90 WUXGA; R50P UXGA
Please PM me if you've had experience with SquareTrade warranties

Puppy
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 2264
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2004 4:52 am
Location: Prague, Czech Republic

#13 Post by Puppy » Thu Aug 16, 2007 4:50 pm

jonnylaw wrote:LG is the only manufacturer of the 14 ws for the t61. I have one and I don't think its that bad. Very bright and only leakage from bottom during startup
This is big problem for me, cheap panels are usually overbrighted. That's why I like former FlexView panels because they aren't white only, they have contrast and black color as well. I usually use first or second step of brightness setting. Desktop LCD monitors are even worse, I had to buy relatively expensive monitor to have wide range of brightness settings (to the low level) without color distortion.

carbon_unit
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 2988
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: South Central Iowa, USA

#14 Post by carbon_unit » Thu Aug 16, 2007 6:11 pm

wearetheborg wrote: Model: 7663-ITU
And I've included a dell inspiron 15" in my comparison (I believe it was the inspiron 8200), how is that comparing in different classes ? If anything, the inpsiron belongs in a lower class. It weighs like 10 pounds :mrgreen:

Oh, and dell uses the same screens in all their 17" (inlcuding inspirons). I've seen an inspiron 17" ($1200), WUXGA, and it was stunning too.
Don't get your panties all in a bundle 'borgie. I was asking you to clarify since you were so vague about the models. There are sub $1000.00 T61's and $2000.00+ Dell Precision M90's.

Get the FRU's here:
http://www-307.ibm.com/pc/support/site. ... yle=lenovo
You'll need a little more info to look them up.
T60 2623-D7U, 3 GB Ram.
Dual boot XP and Linux Mint.
Registered linux user #160145

ryengineer
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4393
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.

#15 Post by ryengineer » Thu Aug 16, 2007 7:04 pm

wearetheborg wrote:Model: 7663-ITU
That's not even a correct Product ID, should be 7663-1TU.

FYI, Samsung, LG Philips and AUO are supplying 14.1 WS lcd panels for T61/R61, although these panels don't even come closer to IPS level but they're pretty acceptable apart from viewing angles. Considering the list of 3 panels above for T61/R61; from my experience I've found LG Philips panels the best, Samsung's so-so and since I've no experience / data available for AUO panels so I can't comment on it.
jonnylaw wrote:LG is the only manufacturer of the 14 ws for the t61.
Please see above, 3 panels are being used for T61 14.1'' WS.
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.

jonnylaw
Posts: 45
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 12:48 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

#16 Post by jonnylaw » Thu Aug 16, 2007 8:00 pm

ryengineer wrote:Please see above, 3 panels are being used for T61 14.1'' WS.
Really? When I checked Lenovo's website, there was only one fru for the 14 wxga+ which was Lg/Phillips. Has this changed, or were you referring to the 14 w in all resolutions (including wxga, not just wxga+?

ryengineer
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 4393
Joined: Wed Sep 20, 2006 9:29 pm
Location: L.A. (home town) CA, Toronto ON.

#17 Post by ryengineer » Thu Aug 16, 2007 9:16 pm

jonnylaw wrote:Really? When I checked Lenovo's website, there was only one fru for the 14 wxga+ which was Lg/Phillips. Has this changed, or were you referring to the 14 w in all resolutions (including wxga, not just wxga+?
All resolutions, however Samsung and LG Philips both still supply panels for T61 14.1'' WXGA+ models.
"I've come a long, long way," she said, "and I will go as far,
With the man who takes me from my horse, and leads me to a bar."
The man who took her off her steed, and stood her to a beer,
Were a bleary-eyed Surveyor and a DRUNKEN ENGINEER.

Tholek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 5:31 pm
Location: NYC, NY
Contact:

#18 Post by Tholek » Fri Aug 17, 2007 8:55 am

I love my 15.4"W T61, but the brightness, which I knew would be less, is a lot less than on my VAIO FS series. I guess the XBrite's brightness has spoiled me a bit.
Image T61 6465-CTO: 15.4" WSXGA+ (LG), X3100, T7200, 100GB 7200rpm, 4GB OCZ, DVD-RW, 6 cell, Atheros A/B/G, Vista Home Prm.

eyecon82
Sophomore Member
Posts: 130
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 5:56 pm

#19 Post by eyecon82 » Sun Aug 19, 2007 1:27 am

Tholek wrote:I love my 15.4"W T61, but the brightness, which I knew would be less, is a lot less than on my VAIO FS series. I guess the XBrite's brightness has spoiled me a bit.
Do you have the samsung or lg 15.4 w? and is it wxga or wxga+ Thanks

Tholek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 5:31 pm
Location: NYC, NY
Contact:

#20 Post by Tholek » Sun Aug 19, 2007 4:13 am

eyecon82 wrote:
Tholek wrote:I love my 15.4"W T61, but the brightness, which I knew would be less, is a lot less than on my VAIO FS series. I guess the XBrite's brightness has spoiled me a bit.
Do you have the samsung or lg 15.4 w? and is it wxga or wxga+ Thanks
Neither. It's the LG WSXGA+ (42T0416/42T0417)
Image T61 6465-CTO: 15.4" WSXGA+ (LG), X3100, T7200, 100GB 7200rpm, 4GB OCZ, DVD-RW, 6 cell, Atheros A/B/G, Vista Home Prm.

Tholek
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 400
Joined: Sat May 19, 2007 5:31 pm
Location: NYC, NY
Contact:

#21 Post by Tholek » Tue Aug 21, 2007 8:04 pm

I may have mentioned this elsewhere, but it's also very blue in tint. That's also annoying me a bit.
Image T61 6465-CTO: 15.4" WSXGA+ (LG), X3100, T7200, 100GB 7200rpm, 4GB OCZ, DVD-RW, 6 cell, Atheros A/B/G, Vista Home Prm.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests