How many Processes do you have running at idle for WinXP?

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply

How many Processes do you have running at idle for WinXP?

Less than 40
3
12%
40-49
3
12%
50-59
3
12%
60-69
7
28%
70-79
4
16%
80+
5
20%
 
Total votes: 25

Message
Author
eecon
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: West Coast, USA

How many Processes do you have running at idle for WinXP?

#1 Post by eecon » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:47 pm

Only T60, T60p, T61 or T61p units with WinXP and ATI or Nvidia Cards please.

Use Task Manager>Processes for the poll after at least 10 minutes of idle after startup or reboot.

Thanks :thumbs-UP:
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0

bigdaddyrobb
Posts: 13
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 6:27 pm
Location: Gladstone,Or

#2 Post by bigdaddyrobb » Tue Feb 05, 2008 9:28 am

I have been very sloppy with letting services run recently..cleaning them up as we speak.
T60 2623-D3U - T2500(2GHz), 2GB RAM, 100GB 5400rpm HD, 15in 1400x1050 LCD, 128MB ATI Radeon X1400, CDRW/DVDRW, Intel 802.11abg wireless, WWAN, Bluetooth/Modem, 1Gb Ethernet, UltraNav, Secure chip, Fingerprint reader, 9c Li-Ion batt, WinXP Pro

eecon
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: West Coast, USA

#3 Post by eecon » Tue Feb 05, 2008 5:26 pm

bigdaddyrobb wrote:I have been very sloppy with letting services run recently..cleaning them up as we speak.
Let us know the results when you can ... thanks!
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#4 Post by jdhurst » Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:39 pm

The NUMBER of processes has NOTHING to do with ANYTHING except memory. This comes up OVER and OVER again and is not a useful thread. ... JDH

eecon
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: West Coast, USA

#5 Post by eecon » Tue Feb 05, 2008 11:39 pm

jdhurst wrote:The NUMBER of processes has NOTHING to do with ANYTHING except memory. This comes up OVER and OVER again and is not a useful thread. ... JDH
I respect your opinion, however I respectfully beg to differ as I decreased my bootup time by nearly 23 seconds by reducing my listed processes from 70 to 65 yesterday.

That few seconds was the difference between making a last minute trade before the markets closed at 4:00 pm ET yesterday, which saved me nearly $1000 by closing out a position that does not normally trade in the after-market (rather than this morning when the bearish ISM report was inadvertly leaked early pre-market opening .... something that caught a lot of traders by surprise). :thumbs-UP:
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0

jdhurst
Admin
Admin
Posts: 5831
Joined: Thu Apr 29, 2004 6:49 am
Location: Toronto, Canada

#6 Post by jdhurst » Wed Feb 06, 2008 10:58 am

eecon wrote:<snip>
I respect your opinion, however I respectfully beg to differ as I decreased my bootup time by nearly 23 seconds by reducing my listed processes from 70 to 65 yesterday.

That few seconds was the difference between making a last minute trade before the markets closed at 4:00 pm ET yesterday, which saved me nearly $1000 by closing out a position that does not normally trade in the after-market (rather than this morning when the bearish ISM report was inadvertly leaked early pre-market opening .... something that caught a lot of traders by surprise). :thumbs-UP:
Fair comment, except that your poll referenced "idle", whereas your comment referenced "boot".

Yes, processes can affect boot time. I have a ton of stuff going at startup and it takes a good 4 minutes for my machine to start. But once running, with 90 processes in play, CPU usage is less than 2 percent well more than 95 percent of the time. And I have lots of free memory left over.

When I need to do something like you described, my machine is already running. ... JDH

eecon
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 706
Joined: Sat Jul 14, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: West Coast, USA

#7 Post by eecon » Wed Feb 06, 2008 4:25 pm

jdhurst wrote:When I need to do something like you described, my machine is already running. ... JDH
I agree :beer:
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BigT0ny and 18 guests