T61 Reverse Cloning HD Update - Failure then Success (WinXP)
I have had a number of successes (and failures) in disk cloning, using both True Image (plus Apricorn, same program, different versions), and with Ghost 2003.
I have tried to assign "blame" for the failures to various pieces of hardware used and whether the disk being cloned was in the drive bay or elsewhere, and whether I first made an image file and then later made the clone from the image file, vs. simply cloning directly.
My own personal observation is that successful disk cloning involves a bit of luck, and will not always happen no matter what combination of factors one uses. This assumes you are using the programs properly (such as using the -ib switch with Ghost 2003, to image the boot sector).
Don't assume that any clone or image file you make will work; most will, but some will not. It is always a good idea to check the integrity of the image file if you make an image file first, although even this does not guarantee success.
I have even had the unfortunate result, once, where the cloned disk appeared to work but I was unable to defragment the drive with Perfect Disk, getting an error message instructing me to use CHKDSK, which also refused to run on boot up. A bit later, this hard disk gave me a blue screen error or two for no apparent reason, so there was something subtle that was wrong in the clone result, but it was not obvious on initial usage. Repeating the cloning from the original source disk completely resolved these problems.
Bottom line, don't assume your clone will always work no matter what you do, and don't assume that any one image file made will work.
If you are making archival backups for restoration of your system if disaster strikes, don't assume anything. Your goal should be to have sequential image backups, so that if you run across an image file that won't work, you can hopefully go back to a slightly earlier image file and odds are that this will work.
I have tried to assign "blame" for the failures to various pieces of hardware used and whether the disk being cloned was in the drive bay or elsewhere, and whether I first made an image file and then later made the clone from the image file, vs. simply cloning directly.
My own personal observation is that successful disk cloning involves a bit of luck, and will not always happen no matter what combination of factors one uses. This assumes you are using the programs properly (such as using the -ib switch with Ghost 2003, to image the boot sector).
Don't assume that any clone or image file you make will work; most will, but some will not. It is always a good idea to check the integrity of the image file if you make an image file first, although even this does not guarantee success.
I have even had the unfortunate result, once, where the cloned disk appeared to work but I was unable to defragment the drive with Perfect Disk, getting an error message instructing me to use CHKDSK, which also refused to run on boot up. A bit later, this hard disk gave me a blue screen error or two for no apparent reason, so there was something subtle that was wrong in the clone result, but it was not obvious on initial usage. Repeating the cloning from the original source disk completely resolved these problems.
Bottom line, don't assume your clone will always work no matter what you do, and don't assume that any one image file made will work.
If you are making archival backups for restoration of your system if disaster strikes, don't assume anything. Your goal should be to have sequential image backups, so that if you run across an image file that won't work, you can hopefully go back to a slightly earlier image file and odds are that this will work.
Ken Fox
Thanks for the good advice ..... my earlier poor choice of the word "always" was presumtive on my part. I'll start keeping older backup images an extra few monthsKen Fox wrote:Bottom line, don't assume your clone will always work no matter what you do, and don't assume that any one image file made will work.
If you are making archival backups for restoration of your system if disaster strikes, don't assume anything. Your goal should be to have sequential image backups, so that if you run across an image file that won't work, you can hopefully go back to a slightly earlier image file and odds are that this will work.
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0
With regard to problems with various external enclosures, that's why I continue to recommend using the Lenovo Serial Hard Drive Ultra Bay adapter, especially for cloning. Seems to avoid those pesky external enclosure issues that frequently crop up and gives faster transfer speeds, not to mention the convenience. But the main thing is the reliability of the clones made with the ultrabay adapter seems to be very, very good, ime.
HP DV8t | Intel i7-Q 720 | 6GB (DDR3 1333) RAM | 1 TB (500GB Seagate 7200 rpm x2)| GeForce GT 230M (1GB) | 18.4" FHD | SuperMulti 8X w Lightscribe | FP Reader | Bluetooth | HDTV Tuner | Win 7 Ultimate x64. Backup: T61p (8891-CTO)
Re: T61 Reverse Cloning HD Update - Failure then Success (WinXP)
why isnt Lenovo simply fixing this drive geometry issue? Problems over and over - Lenovo seems to handle harddisks here very differently compared to other manufacturers. Why is it?
Re: T61 Reverse Cloning HD Update - Failure then Success (WinXP)
I just bought a couple of UltraBay HDD adapters and use those exclusively now ..... hopefully no more cloning worries.SHSH wrote:why isnt Lenovo simply fixing this drive geometry issue? Problems over and over - Lenovo seems to handle harddisks here very differently compared to other manufacturers. Why is it?
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0
Re: T61 Reverse Cloning HD Update - Failure then Success (WinXP)
eecon wrote:I just bought a couple of UltraBay HDD adapters and use those exclusively now ..... hopefully no more cloning worries.
sure, this will fix the problem - but why is Lenovo handling drive geometry differently in first place?
Re: T61 Reverse Cloning HD Update - Failure then Success (WinXP)
I had added, then deleted, a comment about my theory on this.SHSH wrote:sure, this will fix the problem - but why is Lenovo handling drive geometry differently in first place?
I had the feeling it may have been in poor taste ..... basically ranting about about Lenovo's mainland masters and their desires to simply extract more money from dumb, fat and happy Americans, like myself.
Two - T61p 15.4" WS T9300 2.5Ghz units, August 2008 08/08 Builds + Nvidia FX570M GPUs, One - T42 15" Flexview 1.8GHz + ATI GPU for travel, Two - T500 15.4" T9600 & T9400 CPUs with ATI HD3650 GPUs, One - Stupidly Fast W520 15.6" i7-2860QM + Nvidia 2000M GPU + Series 3 Dock w/USB 3.0
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
X1C1 SSD replacement with eBay DIY SSD success
by aabram » Fri Jan 13, 2017 3:11 pm » in ThinkPad X1/X1C - 2 Replies
- 1357 Views
-
Last post by w0qj
Wed Jan 18, 2017 11:11 am
-
-
-
DIY WWAN antenna installation [SUCCESS!]
by Starlight5 » Wed Mar 22, 2017 3:21 pm » in Thinkpad - General HARDWARE/SOFTWARE questions - 3 Replies
- 1027 Views
-
Last post by Starlight5
Sun Apr 23, 2017 5:34 am
-
-
-
T420 16gb RAM success stories? Will ECC (or "registered") work?
by TKuser » Mon May 15, 2017 4:18 pm » in ThinkPad T400/410/420 and T500/510/520 Series - 15 Replies
- 969 Views
-
Last post by avdo
Sat Jun 24, 2017 7:32 pm
-
-
- 42 Replies
- 2706 Views
-
Last post by taichi
Thu Jan 12, 2017 11:44 am
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests




