big difference between Core Duo and Core 2 Duo?

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Message
Author
bim
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:52 am
Location: Kaarina, Finland

#31 Post by bim » Tue Feb 19, 2008 2:41 pm

I didn't notice any performance jump after changing T2500 to T7200, both 2GHz. In fact I didn't notice anything. Not in video encoding or anywhere else.

danny_isr
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 562
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2005 1:05 pm

#32 Post by danny_isr » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:54 pm

i moved from 2Ghz T43 to 2.2Ghz T61p and yes i saw a jump.
but really noticed it when i moved to Vista64.
when both machines run XP it's marginal difference.
but when i moved to Vista64, oh yeah i can see the difference easy.
IBM T61p,2.2GHz,4G,320G 7200,14.1, SXGA+,FX570,Atheros,Btooth,Finger,6c,Win7 RC 64bit
IBM T43,2GHz,2G,80G,14.1 SXGA+,X300,a,b,g,BT,finger,6c,Win7 RC 32bit

ingenious
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:03 am
Location: Germany

#33 Post by ingenious » Wed Feb 20, 2008 4:35 pm

Feeling any difference heavily depends on how you measure it. "Standard" programs won't run much faster at the same clock speed (unless the CPU's pipeline is larger). But I noticed 50% speed increase of a real-time ray tracer when tested on a Core 2 Duo at the same clock as the Core Duo it was developed on. And this was only because the much better implementation of the SSE instructions on the Core 2.

Apart from the SSE3 instruction set, the first Core Duo generation was basically two Pentium M's put together.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 22 guests