Need help with difference in Wireless options.
-
SouthPaw42
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:06 pm
- Location: Pleasant Valley, NY
Need help with difference in Wireless options.
Lenovo lists 3 wireless options. But I am having problems finding information on what is best card. Draft N still has so many compatibility problems that I am not worried about it but what else is the differentiation points of each card?
ThinkPad 11a/b/g Wi-Fi wireless (802.11a/b/g)
Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (802.11a/b/g)
Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN (802.11a/b/g/Draft N)
ThinkPad 11a/b/g Wi-Fi wireless (802.11a/b/g)
Intel PRO/Wireless 3945ABG (802.11a/b/g)
Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN (802.11a/b/g/Draft N)
First off, the "Thinkpad a/b/g" card is and atheros-based chipset wifi card and has an extra channel available on it which is widely used in the EU but not in North America. If you use linux this card is the better choice since it's much easier to configure and is generally very powerful (holds connections very well). It does, however, run warmer than the intel cards because of increased power output, which, in turn, affects battery life (not significantly - we're not talking about abrupt drainage here, but 10 perhaps 15 minute difference with intel card power draw).
The intel cards (intel chipset - combined with an intel CPU certify the computer system as "Centrino") use less power than the atheros card, thus run cooler in the machine and, therefore, saves battery energy (not a great amount compared with the atheros, but still there is less energy drain). These cards are more difficult to configure in linux as there is less native support for the chipset (blame intel).
Opinions regarding which card holds a better signal and is more powerful will vary greatly among users.
In my case, I have no experience with the Intel 3945abg but certainly have experienced the precursor model (intel 2200) and was not overly impressed with the intel card. It kept losing wifi connections although it did better in terms of power draw on my system (T42) - i.e. used less power. I switched to the atheros card, one of the reasons being that I use linux more often than windows and the atheros card was much easier to configure and was very reliable in terms of wifi connectivity.
The intel cards (intel chipset - combined with an intel CPU certify the computer system as "Centrino") use less power than the atheros card, thus run cooler in the machine and, therefore, saves battery energy (not a great amount compared with the atheros, but still there is less energy drain). These cards are more difficult to configure in linux as there is less native support for the chipset (blame intel).
Opinions regarding which card holds a better signal and is more powerful will vary greatly among users.
In my case, I have no experience with the Intel 3945abg but certainly have experienced the precursor model (intel 2200) and was not overly impressed with the intel card. It kept losing wifi connections although it did better in terms of power draw on my system (T42) - i.e. used less power. I switched to the atheros card, one of the reasons being that I use linux more often than windows and the atheros card was much easier to configure and was very reliable in terms of wifi connectivity.
-
SouthPaw42
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:06 pm
- Location: Pleasant Valley, NY
It's not to say the intel 3945abg is not linux friendly, some linux distros (Mint, perhaps Ubuntu) require no further tweaking or installation - the card just works out of the box, although some report that to get full use of the card requires ndiswrapper and the windows drivers which makes it a hassle. The 4965 is a completely different kettle of fish.
I switched to the ThinkPad 11a/b/g (Atheros) card from the Intel 3945 a/b/g - The Intel had problems holding connections on most WLAN routers, while the Atheros holds-on to all connections and seems to be much more sensitive too.
(Note: On my previous T43p which had an Intel 2915 a/b/g I experienced the same problem of losing connections) - I'm using the ThinkVantage Access Connections software which is a little more kinder and flexible than the standard Windows wireless utility - I can not comment on the power consumption between the two cards as I am mainly run the ThinkPad on the Mains and very rarely on battery.
As it stands if you are have a T60(p) the Lenovo Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN card won't work out the box due to BIOS restrictions, but due the forum member: Zender's work, you can flash the BIOS and use virtually any WLAN / WWAN vendors card you wish
As it stands if you are have a T60(p) the Lenovo Intel Wireless WiFi Link 4965AGN card won't work out the box due to BIOS restrictions, but due the forum member: Zender's work, you can flash the BIOS and use virtually any WLAN / WWAN vendors card you wish
T60F: (Integrated Intel GPU) - [Another T60 FrankenPad!...Different approach]
R60F: (Integrated Intel GPU) - [ThinkPad R60 15.0" FrankenPad]
R60F: (Integrated Intel GPU) - [ThinkPad R60 15.0" FrankenPad]
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
-
ThinkPad T43 to T43p - MASSIVE GPU capability difference
by kfzhu1229 » Sat Jan 14, 2017 11:44 pm » in ThinkPad T4x Series - 3 Replies
- 1502 Views
-
Last post by dr_st
Mon Jan 16, 2017 5:39 am
-
-
-
Speed difference W510 i7 720QM vs W520 2720QM
by xsixt » Wed May 03, 2017 11:56 pm » in ThinkPad W500/510/520 and W7x0 Series - 3 Replies
- 685 Views
-
Last post by RMSMajestic
Mon May 22, 2017 3:40 pm
-
-
-
Best display options (including mods) in 200s and 201s?
by wujstefan » Wed Jan 11, 2017 4:28 am » in ThinkPad X200/201/220 and X300/301 Series - 1 Replies
- 825 Views
-
Last post by RealBlackStuff
Wed Jan 11, 2017 8:52 am
-
-
-
T450s Replacement LCD Options
by Mathelo » Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:14 am » in ThinkPad T430/T530 and later Series - 0 Replies
- 389 Views
-
Last post by Mathelo
Fri Jan 13, 2017 10:14 am
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests





