Undecided: X3100+T9300 or Quadro140M+T8300 = same price!
Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 12:35 am
I’ve reading a lot this forum, I guess that’s the reason because I’ll hopefully get my first notebook here: I’m handling a T61 CTO 15.4’ wxga. (I know concerns ‘bout the crappy display, random keyboard qualities, and the fact that the classic thinkpads solid-as-rock are gone)
So at some point, I’ve got two posible configurations for exactly the same price:
1 - GMA X3100; Intel Core 2 Duo processor T9300 (2.5GHz 800MHz 6MBL2)
2 - nVidia Quadro 140M (128mb); Intel Core 2 Duo processor T8300 (2.4GHz 800MHz 3MBL2)
I was wondering which option is more reasonably according to my requirements:
I’m not going to play games. under no circumstances! 3D or vectorial graphs neither. The most heaviest software I’m planing to run is Photoshop, Combustion (video and composition software), Adobe Premiere, and some audio stuffs like Nuendo (audio software where I need to handle a video track to achieve and perform the audio editing matching with the video.
Some divx, HD 720p/1080p h.264 too.
- Can the T9300 in conjunction with the X3100 GPU afford the lack of a ‘powerfull’ GPU (nvidia) to handle my requeriments more than ‘just-fine’?
- How will this T9300 get warm without the help of the ‘powerful’ GPU (nvidia) to handle my requeriments?
- Wich is the more heating configuration? 1 or 2?
- Wich one can I get a more overall performance?
What I presume to be true about Nvidia Quadro 140M against GMA X3100:
Pros:
- I guess “a better general performance” in all-kind aplications (even surfing the net)
- Full HD/video playback without compromising CPU usage.
Cons:
- More weighty.
- More warmly.
- More power consume
- Less battery life
- One more fan to worry about! hehe!
Finally: which way you’d go? I’m stuck!
Thanks
So at some point, I’ve got two posible configurations for exactly the same price:
1 - GMA X3100; Intel Core 2 Duo processor T9300 (2.5GHz 800MHz 6MBL2)
2 - nVidia Quadro 140M (128mb); Intel Core 2 Duo processor T8300 (2.4GHz 800MHz 3MBL2)
I was wondering which option is more reasonably according to my requirements:
I’m not going to play games. under no circumstances! 3D or vectorial graphs neither. The most heaviest software I’m planing to run is Photoshop, Combustion (video and composition software), Adobe Premiere, and some audio stuffs like Nuendo (audio software where I need to handle a video track to achieve and perform the audio editing matching with the video.
Some divx, HD 720p/1080p h.264 too.
- Can the T9300 in conjunction with the X3100 GPU afford the lack of a ‘powerfull’ GPU (nvidia) to handle my requeriments more than ‘just-fine’?
- How will this T9300 get warm without the help of the ‘powerful’ GPU (nvidia) to handle my requeriments?
- Wich is the more heating configuration? 1 or 2?
- Wich one can I get a more overall performance?
What I presume to be true about Nvidia Quadro 140M against GMA X3100:
Pros:
- I guess “a better general performance” in all-kind aplications (even surfing the net)
- Full HD/video playback without compromising CPU usage.
Cons:
- More weighty.
- More warmly.
- More power consume
- Less battery life
- One more fan to worry about! hehe!
Finally: which way you’d go? I’m stuck!
Thanks