Discrete GPU vs. integrated

T60/T61 series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
Rich.Carpenter
Posts: 27
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: Fishers, IN

Discrete GPU vs. integrated

#1 Post by Rich.Carpenter » Tue Jun 10, 2008 6:45 am

Hello. I'm new to the forums and am contemplating my next notebook purchase. I'm leaning toward the T61 and hoping that someone might give me their impressions of the differences between discrete and integrated graphics.

For the most part, I will be doing Windows and web application development on this machine, but I do foresee myself dabbling in some light 3D modeling. I'm pretty sure the integrated graphics would handle what I would throw at it, but discrete graphics would, of course, be better suited for the task.

My question is how much of a difference might I expect between the two with regard to battery life (time on a charge) and heat generation?

Anyone have any experience with both?
Current notebook: T500....ThinkPads owned in the past: A20m | 570E | 600E

rhema83
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 338
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 11:32 pm
Location: Singapore
Contact:

#2 Post by rhema83 » Tue Jun 10, 2008 10:55 am

If you intend to do any 3D modelling, I suggest you take discreet graphics. I spent a few months doing AutoCAD 3D modelling on my X61. Only wireframe modes were smooth. Any kind of rendering or realistic view will slow the system significantly.

I don't think the NVS 140M is very power hungry. At least when compared to the workstation-grade FX 570M.
X61 7675-CTO Merom 2.0GHz 4GB RAM, 7K200 HDD

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad T6x Series”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: 91011, zoltan87 and 8 guests