I gather that the problems were with certain boards and that they were resolved in the end (otherwise I would not have bought
One of the prerequisites seems to have been both memory slots being used - if only one was used then the problem did not show up (or less often?).
I have a Z61m with a single 2 Gb memory module which will be "downgraded" to my "development / test" machine. At present it is running XP.
I have seldom seen more than 450 Mb in use on the Z61m.
The T61p will be running the same software (and XP).
I am thinking of loading Vista (have the upgrade CD for it) on the Z61m so that I can familiarize myself with it (so far I am not impressed).
I am too much out of touch with the developments in the IT field so am asking for input from the more knowledgeable members.
Should I:
a) just swap the memory - both machines 2 Gb and change the T61p to a single 2Gb memory module and the Z61m to two 1Gb memory modules (at the moment it is the other way round)
or
b) take 1 Gb out of the T61p and add it to the Z61m making it 3 Gb
or
c) leave everything as it is?
The reasoning leading to these questions are:
I perceive that there were less problems noted with one memory module.
This means that there - should - be a longer life expectancy / less chance of a failure when using a single memory stick rather than two. Or am I mistaken?
On the other hand using two same sized memory sticks will improve memory throughput ( according to Intel ) up to 8%.
Also the question needs to be asked if the Z61m will run Vista better with two 1 Gb memory modules or run better with 3 Gb?
Many thanks in advance





