cl0ne wrote:I have a T61 and T60 run a super pi test the results were 1.13m and .35m respectively.
Now my T61 has a T7250 Intel Core 2 duo while the T60 has a T2500 Core Duo, both running on 3 gigs of ram.
I am running Windows 7 on the T61 and XP on T60. While the question seems obvious in addition to why is the T61 calculating super pi at a much lower speed, does 2 different types of ram effect the overall speed of the system? The configuration of the T61 ram is that 1gb from lenovo and 2gb from corsair ValueSelect both DDR2 5300(s).
Is there a way to check the cpu speed other then comparing super pi tests? Thanks!
If you mean cpu performance, there are many ways to do this, resp. many different benchmark programs. Matlab has a built-in benchmarking function, Everest also has, you can run calc in windows and let it compute n! (n factorial) for big n-s, but you will have to time it manually, you can google for benchmark programs, there are really many out there, you can download 3DMark and run only the cpu tests etc. It is general practice to install matching pairs of RAM (even if asymmetrical), that means also from the same vendor, same product line, same timing etc to avoid mismatches. As to why your T61 performs worse than your T60, I believe the answer is that Super Pi is probably not suitable yet for Win 7 beta (although it can run on it) or Win 7 beta is simply slower than XP, which I hope won´t be the case with the final release... If you are just looking for a stressing program, google for burn-in software. That would stress your hardware pretty good for a couple of hours.
Cheers
Marin
IBM Lenovo Z61p | 15.4'' WUXGA | Intel Core 2 Duo T7400 2x 2.16GHz | 4 GB Kingston HyperX | Hitachi 7K500 500 GB + WD 1TB (USB) | ATI Mobility FireGL V5200 | ThinkPad Atheros a/b/g | Analog Devices AD1981HD | Win 7 x86 + ArchLinux 2009.08 x64 (number crunching)