sheynk wrote:
I would not underestimate how hungry some of the business applications are however, and that makes me wonder
It could be something to consider, depending on how much disk access is needed for your business apps. Are these huge Access files you are talking about, like a corporate data base? Or are these your avg. everyday small to meduium business apps? (Big difference)
Reason being....disc access(achiles heel of the X41) comes into play now...
X32 is faster than X41 on disc access...--> 4200 rpm drive vs. 5400 rpm.(Granted some of the difference is made up by the 4200rpm drive being a smaller drive with data packed closer together) and is probably %90 of reason for the performance difference between the two pads.
Ok...maybe we can break it down a little more..
X32 ---Faster Centrino X41 Slower Centrino(uses less power)
X41 processing diffienciency made up by a newer platform --->
X32 ---Older Intel Chipset(855?) X41(Newer Intel Chipset(915GM)
X32 ---333 DDR X41(400 DDR2) ---> this could be a wash considering the higher latency of DDR2 memory.
X32 Ati Graphics with 16mb Vid Mem.(this chip is really aging), X41- Intel 900 128mb Vid Mem. (first time an intel graphics chip is better then anything)
If you really think your business apps will have a lot..I mean a lot of disk access, you will notcie the differnce and you might want to reconsider a X32 not only because it has a 5400 rpm drive,,,,but you have more of a possiblity of adding a 7200 rpm drive at the 2.8 inch form facter ...than you do at the 1.8 inch form factor.
You can make up some of the differnce by adding the ram.(good idea), but it's up to you to decide weather you need/want the extra disk performance over portability.