Solid state 1.8" drives shipping in 2007

X2/X3/X4x series specific matters only
Post Reply
Message
Author
seneca
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:27 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

Solid state 1.8" drives shipping in 2007

#1 Post by seneca » Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:25 pm

I just saw this post on slashdot:

http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/0 ... 1232.shtml

I wonder if they will have a compatible connector for the X40.

And I hope they will be cheaper then these:

http://www.dvnation.com/nand-flash-ssd.html#Samsung
Thinkpad x220 Li7-2620M 8gb/80gb mSATA intel 320SSD/160gb Intel 330 (didn't fit, had to remove the aluminium shell)
Linux Mint 17

dmar
Freshman Member
Posts: 111
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2004 7:33 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

#2 Post by dmar » Thu Dec 14, 2006 12:56 pm

I'm too lazy to read through all of the slashdot comments. But curious what this quote means to us x41 users...
While streaming performance can't equal that of hard disks, Samsung claims that random-access performance is more important and that (e.g.) Vista users would see a 4x speedup in many key operations.
Does this mean we'll get the bootup boost, but won't see actual peformance increases in everyday related apps? If the solid state hard drive gets anywhere near a 7200rpm platter, it would make me rethink selling my tablet. :D
x31 (2672-BBU)
x60s (1704-4DU)
T43 (2668-NU3)

seneca
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:27 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

#3 Post by seneca » Thu Dec 14, 2006 1:03 pm

No it's not about fast boots and the like, even though it's a bit faster.

I think the Solid state drives will be about the same speed or perhaps twice as fast as a 4200rpm 1.8" hdd when streaming. Meaning when you load a large file into memory from the hdd or download from your LAN to your harddrive.

The biggest advantage is in the random I/O operations, meaning swap, background-writes, seektime and simultaneously open files.

Seektime is down to 1ms compared to like...12ms (?) of our 1.8" hdds and 6.5ms of the fastest SCSI drives. And random I/O is really good since there is no moving parts.
Thinkpad x220 Li7-2620M 8gb/80gb mSATA intel 320SSD/160gb Intel 330 (didn't fit, had to remove the aluminium shell)
Linux Mint 17

draco2527
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 707
Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 12:41 am
Location: Sterling Heights, Michigan

Re: Solid state 1.8" drives shipping in 2007

#4 Post by draco2527 » Sun Dec 17, 2006 2:22 am

seneca wrote:I just saw this post on slashdot:

http://hardware.slashdot.org/hardware/0 ... 1232.shtml

I wonder if they will have a compatible connector for the X40.

And I hope they will be cheaper then these:

http://www.dvnation.com/nand-flash-ssd.html#Samsung
If the environment required the use of a HD of this caliber ($$); I might do it...but for that kind of coin, I'll take an X60T!

If the cost was 2 or even 3 times what a regular HD would cost...then...yes, I woul get one in a heartbeat!
X220T Multi-touch
T410
X61T (pen)
X61T X2 (pen/touch) 1-WIN7 1-WIN8
T61

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#5 Post by tomh009 » Sun Dec 17, 2006 1:51 pm

seneca wrote:I think the Solid state drives will be about the same speed or perhaps twice as fast as a 4200rpm 1.8" hdd when streaming. Meaning when you load a large file into memory from the hdd or download from your LAN to your harddrive.
I don't think so. Hitachi's old C4K40 1.8" 4200 rpm drive is rated at between 16.8 and 30.0 MB/s off the media. The fastest solid-state media read speeds are currently between 16 and 17 MB/s regardless of the interface type (USB2, Firewire etc.):
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_ ... =6007-8462
seneca wrote:The biggest advantage is in the random I/O operations, meaning swap, background-writes, seektime and simultaneously open files.

Seektime is down to 1ms compared to like...12ms (?) of our 1.8" hdds and 6.5ms of the fastest SCSI drives. And random I/O is really good since there is no moving parts.
This will indeed be better on solid-state drives.

fudgy
Freshman Member
Posts: 53
Joined: Sat May 20, 2006 11:53 am
Location: Chicago, IL

#6 Post by fudgy » Wed Dec 20, 2006 5:38 pm

One of the most important aspects of having a solid state drive will be much lower power consumption.

taob
Sophomore Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

#7 Post by taob » Thu Jan 04, 2007 11:58 am

tomh009 wrote:The fastest solid-state media read speeds are currently between 16 and 17 MB/s regardless of the interface type (USB2, Firewire etc.):
http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_ ... =6007-8462
The current speed champ is SanDisk's Extreme IV flash memory with a UDMA-4 Firewire 800 reader... it comes just a bit shy of tickling 40 MB/s sustained I/O in that configuration. It was released early last year, although no digital camera can yet take full advantage of the speed.

The benchmark results are at the page you linked to above, but you need to scroll to the right of the CF results table.
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD

taob
Sophomore Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

#8 Post by taob » Thu Jan 04, 2007 12:32 pm

Here's a newer article:

SanDisk Launches 32 Gigabyte Solid State Drive (Jan 4 2007)

1.8" form factor, 60 MB/s (!), 7000 iops, 2 million hours MTBF. Initial cost... USD600. :cry:
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD

seneca
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:27 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

#9 Post by seneca » Fri Jan 05, 2007 3:39 am

wow, not bad at all :D

I can't wait until these drives are available to the consumer :D

And seriously...600USD ain't that bad, it's about 450EUR.

I remember my first 80gb 3.5" hdd costing around 600USD when I bought it.
Thinkpad x220 Li7-2620M 8gb/80gb mSATA intel 320SSD/160gb Intel 330 (didn't fit, had to remove the aluminium shell)
Linux Mint 17

taob
Sophomore Member
Posts: 155
Joined: Mon May 10, 2004 7:17 pm
Location: Toronto, ON
Contact:

#10 Post by taob » Fri Jan 05, 2007 10:47 am

I wonder if they've worked around the write cycle limitation of NAND memory cells then?
- Brian
2004: 2371-8EU X40, 1.2 GHz Pentium M, 1 GB, 40 GB, 802.11b/g, 2 x 8-cell
2007: 2623-DDU T60p, 2.0 GHz T2500, 2 GB, 200GB 7200 rpm, 802.11a/b/g, BT, 3 x 9-cell, 15" UXGA FlexView, Adv Mini Dock
2011: 4286-CTO X220, 2.5 GHz i5-2520M, 8 GB, 60GB SSD, 250GB HD

malone
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Mar 23, 2006 10:13 am

#11 Post by malone » Fri Jan 05, 2007 12:17 pm

Does anyone know if the recently announced SanDisk solid-state hard drive is compatible with the X41? As I recall, we have a bit of a funky hardware interface that doesn't make us compatible with all industry 1.8" drives...

seneca
Sophomore Member
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2006 1:27 pm
Location: Stockholm, Sweden

#12 Post by seneca » Fri Jan 05, 2007 4:17 pm

taob wrote:I wonder if they've worked around the write cycle limitation of NAND memory cells then?
These SSD's have write-cycle equalization algorithms that even out the load on the the flash. The limited write cycles are not an issue with SSD hdds.
Thinkpad x220 Li7-2620M 8gb/80gb mSATA intel 320SSD/160gb Intel 330 (didn't fit, had to remove the aluminium shell)
Linux Mint 17

dmdsoftware
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 385
Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2005 2:24 pm
Location: Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

#13 Post by dmdsoftware » Fri Jan 19, 2007 9:17 pm

Considering the X60 has been tagged as able to accommodate 1.8" and 2.5" drives, will this work in an X60?

EDIT: noticed they are PATA, so, NO, they won't work on an X60.
X62 & X62s & X62T SXGA+ i7 5600u 8-16GB
Helix i7
Carbon X1 i5 UHD
W520 4x-i7
Sony Vaio P799 (8" LED 1600x768)
"Think" Ultrabook i7
LegoThinkpad 11"

in storage:
X131e AMD
X60/X60s, X61/X61s/X61T, T61, T420, X30

past:
X20-X24, 390X

teetee
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 310
Joined: Wed Jul 27, 2005 7:51 am
Location: Rhode Island 02874

16GB RiDATA SSD for $169

#14 Post by teetee » Mon Jan 22, 2007 12:50 pm

16GB RiDATA SSD for $169

http://www.dailytech.com/article.aspx?newsid=5645

It doesn't seem to mention anything about the random read/write speed though.

Here is another article:
http://press.arrivenet.com/technology/a ... 95971.html

berlin
Freshman Member
Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 1:38 pm
Location: San Francisco, CA USA

#15 Post by berlin » Fri Mar 16, 2007 11:03 pm

Any update on SSDs. I made a mistake of buying an X41. Hehe
X60s 1.83GHZ 3GB 80GB 7200RPM V
X41 1.5GHZ 1GB 40GB XP
T21 800MHZ 256MB 30GB XP
600E PII 400MHZ 256MB 12GB XP

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “ThinkPad X2/X3/X4x Series incl. X41 Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests