Page 1 of 1
Intel Pro Wireless vs Centrino Duo
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 4:35 pm
by wirels
I just noticed the 2 different models, 1702 and the 1704. The only major difference I can see between the 2 is the wireless cards, the more expensive being the centrino duo. I really can't see paying $200 or so for the difference.
The 2 exact models are the 1702-68u and the 1704-69u.
Can anyone see anything different? Is the centrino worth the difference or is it just Intel marketing?
Thanks,
Bill
Posted: Thu Apr 20, 2006 5:33 pm
by domi
They also have different batteries: slim 4-cell (1702-68U) vs. 8-cell (1704-69U). Which one is better is up to you: I'd personally go for the former (to minimize size/weight), but you'd get longer battery life with the latter.
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 12:11 am
by wirels
I caught the battery difference as well. Thing is, for the $200 differnce, I can purchse a slim battery to keep on the side. It really appears as if you're getting less for your money, with the exception of the centrino name.
If someone can point out a benefit to the centrin duo overe the duo, I'd be interested to hear it. Otherwise I'm jut going to get the straight duo.
Bill
Posted: Fri Apr 21, 2006 4:06 am
by pdudas
1704-69U has a non Intel wifi card. I think it is an Atheros card.
If you ever want to use linux on your thinkpad, you should buy the atheros version....
http://www-131.ibm.com/webapp/wcs/store ... logId=-840
In this page there is Thinkpad a/b/g wireless card (in the 1704-69u) as in mine X60.
I have an atheros AR5BXB6 wireless card.
http://www-131.ibm.com/webapp/wcs/store ... p_tab-prod
Posted: Mon Apr 24, 2006 10:10 am
by aceo07
I'm not sure what the difference is. From an article I've read, Intel called a laptop with their processor AND their wireless card as having Centrino technology. If it doesn't have their wireless card, it's not Centrino technology. I think it's just a big marketing thing.