Underclocking utility / Single core

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply
Message
Author
trentblase
Sophomore Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

Underclocking utility / Single core

#1 Post by trentblase » Mon Jun 26, 2006 10:53 pm

I know a similar topic has been discussed, much of that discussion has been general info about how to balance undervolting with a corresponding decrease in clock speed. This specific question has not been answered:

Does anyone know of an underclocking utility that works for the x60s that will get the clock multiplier under 6?

A clock multiplier of 6 is about 1ghz, which can still run a little hot in my opinion. I see no technical reason why Intel wouldn't allow a lower clock rate or Lenovo couldn't have implemented lower multipliers, but I have no idea how one would attempt to change this value.

Another idea is to disable one of the cores dynamically. Is this possible, and would it help power consumption noticably? (I know you can disable this in bios -- I may run power tests of my own with this option).
Thinkpad X60s 1702-3QU
All system updates installed

christopher_wolf
Special Member
Posts: 5741
Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 1:24 pm
Location: UC Berkeley, California
Contact:

#2 Post by christopher_wolf » Tue Jun 27, 2006 12:37 am

Without getting into the really dangerous area where there is a real chance of actual hardware damage, you can't really go lower than the minimum clock+mulitplier combo that Intel specifies. My T43 can go as low as 800Mhz while the T42 can go lower to 600MHz...going lower than 800MHz on the T43 with the same core voltage would cause significant instability as would going lower than 600MHz with the same core voltage on a T42. When designing, they make certain assumptions about the minimum clock speed that the chipset should run at; Intel has, apparently, designed it around 1GHz for the Core Duos and Core Solos.


I didn't see a way to dynamically switch off one core, though; I was too busy playing with my friend's new X60. :)
IBM ThinkPad T43 Model 2668-72U 14.1" SXGA+ 1GB |IBM 701c

~o/
I met someone who looks a lot like you.
She does the things you do.
But she is an IBM.
/~o ---ELO from "Yours Truly 2059"

trentblase
Sophomore Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

#3 Post by trentblase » Tue Jun 27, 2006 6:51 am

Could you go into more depth about these minimum clock speed assumptions? I'm not trying to be difficult, I'd really like to know.
Thinkpad X60s 1702-3QU
All system updates installed

Antioch
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 362
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2004 10:20 am
Location: Japan/California

#4 Post by Antioch » Wed Jun 28, 2006 8:20 am

Not only is there a minimum clockspeed assumption, but Intel also set it up so that you can not lower the voltage below 0.95v. Which is pretty high, IMO. That doesn't give much room for undervolting, but what can ya do? =/
Past: T42, T60
Present: X61s, Y450
Future: X302?

trentblase
Sophomore Member
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 7:56 pm
Location: SF Bay Area

#5 Post by trentblase » Wed Jun 28, 2006 5:04 pm

I completely understand why there would be a minimim voltage assumption. Lower the voltage too much, and you don't make the threshold voltage for the transistors.

A 1ghz minimim clock speed assumption just doesn't make sense to me, which is why I'm curious what I must be missing.
Thinkpad X60s 1702-3QU
All system updates installed

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests