Will the new X seires has ...

X60/X61 series specific matters only.
Post Reply
Message
Author
ludu35
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: North CA
Contact:

Will the new X seires has ...

#1 Post by ludu35 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 8:54 pm

a dedicate graphic controller such ATI or NVidia with mucho DDR3 VRAM.
My cousin just got a Dell XPS M1210 (Sub notebook), it is very nice and has all bell and whistle, Core 2 Duo and webcam builtin, but the very impressive thing on that laptop is Nvidia 256MB graphic controller ...
Wish IBM will has this in their next X series
LD
Ludu35 - San Jose, CA
X220: i7-2620M IPS 16GB Samsung 830 128GB series

smvp6459
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: USA

#2 Post by smvp6459 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:13 pm

I'd rather have a sub-3 pound notebook that's not widescreen/glossy. That dedicated graphics card is only 64MB with up to 192MB shared (coming out of the system memory). Plus the Dell doesn't offer a low voltage processor...

The XPS is geared toward a different audience than the X60/s.

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

Re: Will the new X seires has ...

#3 Post by pianowizard » Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:16 pm

ludu35 wrote:My cousin just got a Dell XPS M1210 (Sub notebook)
At 4.37 lbs, it's too heavy to be considered a subnotebook, but is instead a "think and light" laptop.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

ludu35
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: North CA
Contact:

#4 Post by ludu35 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:38 pm

smvp6459 wrote:I'd rather have a sub-3 pound notebook that's not widescreen/glossy. That dedicated graphics card is only 64MB with up to 192MB shared (coming out of the system memory). Plus the Dell doesn't offer a low voltage processor...

The XPS is geared toward a different audience than the X60/s.

256MB dedicaed memory, not shared ....

opps, forgot i am in a diehard thinkpad forum :-)

LD
Ludu35 - San Jose, CA
X220: i7-2620M IPS 16GB Samsung 830 128GB series

smvp6459
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: USA

#5 Post by smvp6459 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:48 pm

The XPS has 64MB dedicated. Look at footnote #12 on Dell's own site:

http://www.dell.com/content/products/pr ... l=en&s=dhs


At 4.37 pounds it just doesn't seem that special.

You can get a 14.1 inch T60p with a real 256MB dedicated graphics card and it can weigh 4.6 pounds. And it comes out to be less than the XPS. I'm not die hard Thinpad person, I just don't think the XPS is anything amazing.

ludu35
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: North CA
Contact:

#6 Post by ludu35 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:56 pm

smvp6459 wrote:The XPS has 64MB dedicated. Look at footnote #12 on Dell's own site:

http://www.dell.com/content/products/pr ... l=en&s=dhs


At 4.37 pounds it just doesn't seem that special.

You can get a 14.1 inch T60p with a real 256MB dedicated graphics card and it can weigh 4.6 pounds. And it comes out to be less than the XPS. I'm not die hard Thinpad person, I just don't think the XPS is anything amazing.
Opps, you RIGHT
Thanks for the link smvp6459
LD
Ludu35 - San Jose, CA
X220: i7-2620M IPS 16GB Samsung 830 128GB series

ludu35
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: North CA
Contact:

#7 Post by ludu35 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 9:59 pm

smvp6459 wrote:The XPS has 64MB dedicated. Look at footnote #12 on Dell's own site:

http://www.dell.com/content/products/pr ... l=en&s=dhs


At 4.37 pounds it just doesn't seem that special.

You can get a 14.1 inch T60p with a real 256MB dedicated graphics card and it can weigh 4.6 pounds. And it comes out to be less than the XPS. I'm not die hard Thinpad person, I just don't think the XPS is anything amazing.
smvp6459
I am using T43p now, too heavy, my next laptop must be a lot lighter with everything and NON built-in Intel Graphics card
Ludu35 - San Jose, CA
X220: i7-2620M IPS 16GB Samsung 830 128GB series

agarza
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1492
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:31 am
Location: Guadalajara, Jalisco MEXICO

#8 Post by agarza » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:03 pm

My T42p is considered thin and portable to me. I can't imagine owning a X60 series laptop, too small to me, specially with the XGA screen.
Current
T440p:
Core i7-4710MQ|8GB RAM|Intel SSD S3700 200GB | 14.1" IPS FHD | Windows 7 Pro, T450 Trackpad, Backlit keyboard, 2nd Caddy
Past: T420 HD+, X61s XGA, T61 14" SXGA+, T42p 14.1 SXGA+, T30, A22e

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#9 Post by pianowizard » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:06 pm

ludu35 wrote:I am using T43p now, too heavy, my next laptop must be a lot lighter with everything and NON built-in Intel Graphics card
This reminds me of a comment that I made several days ago. Both the T and the X series are great, but there needs to be something in between, something in the 4 lb range with a built-in optical drive, and perhaps a dedicated graphics card, like Dell's XPS line.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#10 Post by pianowizard » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:11 pm

benottomex wrote:I can't imagine owning a X60 series laptop, too small to me, specially with the XGA screen.
But have you owned or used laptops that are less than 3 lbs?
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

agarza
ThinkPadder
ThinkPadder
Posts: 1492
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 10:31 am
Location: Guadalajara, Jalisco MEXICO

#11 Post by agarza » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:15 pm

Nein, I've used a 13" Compaq Presario 1685 back in 2000. A Thinkpad A22 with a 13.1" LCD, a T30 with a 14.1" display and my new baby T42p.

For sure a X60 series laptop is very cool to carry everywhere, maybe in the future I'll buy one.
Current
T440p:
Core i7-4710MQ|8GB RAM|Intel SSD S3700 200GB | 14.1" IPS FHD | Windows 7 Pro, T450 Trackpad, Backlit keyboard, 2nd Caddy
Past: T420 HD+, X61s XGA, T61 14" SXGA+, T42p 14.1 SXGA+, T30, A22e

ludu35
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: North CA
Contact:

#12 Post by ludu35 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:26 pm

pianowizard wrote:
ludu35 wrote:I am using T43p now, too heavy, my next laptop must be a lot lighter with everything and NON built-in Intel Graphics card
This reminds me of a comment that I made several days ago. Both the T and the X series are great, but there needs to be something in between, something in the 4 lb range with a built-in optical drive, and perhaps a dedicated graphics card, like Dell's XPS line.
Same here .. I do like X series and wishiing to owned one in the near future and hopefully the new one has dedicated graphic card and built-in optical drive.

I also owed x41 tablet, but gave it to my sister cause the hard drive is big SUCK on this model.

LD
Ludu35 - San Jose, CA
X220: i7-2620M IPS 16GB Samsung 830 128GB series

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#13 Post by pianowizard » Sun Dec 03, 2006 10:29 pm

benottomex wrote:For sure a X60 series laptop is very cool to carry everywhere, maybe in the future I'll buy one.
Once you own a <3lb notebook, you will never carry your T42p ever again.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#14 Post by tomh009 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:31 pm

ludu35 wrote:Same here .. I do like X series and wishiing to owned one in the near future and hopefully the new one has dedicated graphic card and built-in optical drive.
I understand the request for decent graphics (especially with the arrival of Vista!) but what's with the optical drive? I'd rather have a thinner and lighter notebook than one with an optical drive. (Yes, you can say Sony blah blah blah etc but the Sony, too, would be lighter without the optical drive.) Do you actually use an optical drive on a daily basis, and while away from home/office?

ludu35
Sophomore Member
Posts: 168
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 1:19 am
Location: North CA
Contact:

#15 Post by ludu35 » Sun Dec 03, 2006 11:49 pm

tomh009 wrote:
ludu35 wrote:Same here .. I do like X series and wishiing to owned one in the near future and hopefully the new one has dedicated graphic card and built-in optical drive.
I understand the request for decent graphics (especially with the arrival of Vista!) but what's with the optical drive? I'd rather have a thinner and lighter notebook than one with an optical drive. (Yes, you can say Sony blah blah blah etc but the Sony, too, would be lighter without the optical drive.) Do you actually use an optical drive on a daily basis, and while away from home/office?
tomh009
Point taken .. but it is Christmas and I just want to fill-up the wish list :-) and few more things beside decent graphic and optical drive:

- Nice webcam built-in with good mic
- SATA II

What else???
LD
Ludu35 - San Jose, CA
X220: i7-2620M IPS 16GB Samsung 830 128GB series

el aye
Freshman Member
Posts: 55
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2005 10:43 pm
Location: NY
Contact:

#16 Post by el aye » Mon Dec 04, 2006 1:55 am

tomh009 wrote:
ludu35 wrote:Same here .. I do like X series and wishiing to owned one in the near future and hopefully the new one has dedicated graphic card and built-in optical drive.
I understand the request for decent graphics (especially with the arrival of Vista!) but what's with the optical drive? I'd rather have a thinner and lighter notebook than one with an optical drive. (Yes, you can say Sony blah blah blah etc but the Sony, too, would be lighter without the optical drive.) Do you actually use an optical drive on a daily basis, and while away from home/office?
I agree. It's nice to have an optical drive, but I rarely use it in a laptop. If I really need to be able to access optical media, I can always create an image and use a virtual drive.

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#17 Post by tomh009 » Mon Dec 04, 2006 6:01 am

ludu35 wrote:Point taken .. but it is Christmas and I just want to fill-up the wish list :-) and few more things beside decent graphic and optical drive:
- Nice webcam built-in with good mic
- SATA II
It's Christmas and I'll be Scrooge, I guess! :)

SATA II really doesn't do much for a laptop. 3.0 Gb/s is not going to make any difference with laptop drives (fastest 7200 rpm 2.5" drives are around 650 Mb/s data rate), and NCQ and staggered spinup are targeted at SATA RAID arrays.

eSATA is conceptually more interesting, would provide faster connection for external drives -- but for some incomprehensible reason the SATA-IO committee decided that the eSATA connector did not need to carry power, so you need a separate power connector (whether USB or AC adapter). Not really optimal for laptop use, then!

I would support FireWire-800 instead. 800 Mb/s and includes power. And it would be a logical upgrade from the X31's FireWire-400. 8)

smvp6459
Junior Member
Junior Member
Posts: 462
Joined: Tue May 23, 2006 11:02 pm
Location: USA

#18 Post by smvp6459 » Mon Dec 04, 2006 3:22 pm

It doesn't address the graphics card issue, but it takes care of optical drive while being light weight. I doubt it will ever come to the US market, though:

http://www.engadget.com/2006/12/04/necs ... 2-14-poun/

dfumento
Senior Member
Senior Member
Posts: 891
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2005 8:27 pm
Location: Manhattan, NY

#19 Post by dfumento » Mon Dec 04, 2006 5:56 pm

I've been using X60 for six months now and X41 Tablet for six months before that and I'd never plan to go back to the 'T' series.

I have an external USB 2.0 slim DVD burner with high performing specs than the built-in DVD burners in the 'T' series and the entire thing cost about $120.

I rarely need to take it with me.

Regarding graphics, at least for me, it is very suitable as it is. The Santa Rosa chipset due second quarter 2007 will have a faster grahics processor. Just remember that a discrete graphics processor will take more battery and I like my unit's battery life.

Go ahead and get an X60(s).
X201s: 1440x900 LED backlit 2.13 GHz, 8 GB, 160 GB Intel X25-M Gen 2 SSD, 6200 a/b/g/n, BT, 6-cell, 9-cell, Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1, Verizon 4G LTE USB modem, USB 2.0 external optical drive, Lenovo USB to DVI converter
Previous Models: A21p, A30p, A31p, T42, X41T, X60s, X61s, X200s

pianowizard
Senior ThinkPadder
Senior ThinkPadder
Posts: 8368
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 5:07 am
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Contact:

#20 Post by pianowizard » Mon Dec 04, 2006 8:21 pm

Like many of you, I don't need an internal optical drive either, but many people would find a 4-lb, 12" laptop with an optical drive very appealing. I think most of the leading manufacturers have such models. Before the Dell Inspiron 700m (an example of this kind of laptop) was discontinued about a year ago, it was one of Dell's most popular models. I still see lots of people use it at conferences, and I enjoyed using it for almost two years.
Microsoft Surface 3 (Atom x7-Z8700 / 4GB / 128GB / LTE)
Dell OptiPlex 9010 SFF (Core i3-3220 / 8GB / 8TB); HP 8300 Elite minitower (Core i7-3770 / 16GB / 9.25TB)
Acer T272HUL; Crossover 404K; Dell 3008WFP, U2715H, U2711, P2416D; Monoprice 10734; QNIX QHD2410R; Seiki Pro SM40UNP

boon
Sophomore Member
Posts: 195
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:05 am
Location: Arizona

#21 Post by boon » Fri Jan 12, 2007 11:10 pm

the xps kinda destroy the purpose of a light notebook. The sony sz series does have a decent video card too, and also same weight as the xps with a 13.3 screen.

Still a dedicated video card would be great in a thinkpad too, a thinkpad x31/32 alike, with directx10 :)
I love thinkpads

Esben
Sophomore Member
Posts: 141
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 7:50 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Contact:

#22 Post by Esben » Wed Jan 24, 2007 11:58 am

A dedicated graphics card really isn't that important in a notebook. It isn't meant for gaming anyway, and even if it could, it wouldn't be immersive on a 12" display.

I'd switch my T42 in a second for a X6x, if it had a 1400x1050 screen and a Core2 CPU.

Even an integrated graphics card is able to run Vistas Aero glass interface.
Lenovo Thinkpad X230,
i5-3320M | 8 GB DDR3-1600 | 256 GB Crucial M4 | 12.5" IPS | Windows 8 Pro

tomh009
Moderator Emeritus
Moderator Emeritus
Posts: 3021
Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2005 3:30 pm
Location: Kitchener, ON

#23 Post by tomh009 » Thu Jan 25, 2007 3:19 pm

And a dedicated graphics card typically uses significantly more power -- that means either shorter battery life or more weight to accommodate a bigger battery.

andreas74
Posts: 27
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 6:59 am
Location: Switzerland

#24 Post by andreas74 » Thu Jan 25, 2007 7:47 pm

yea, and more heat == noise!
seriously, ive used a sony sz for a while, which has a hardware switch for dedicated OR internal gfx (called 'speed' and 'stamina' mode).
The only difference that i was able to notice when using the dedicated gfx was more noise. Quite a bit more. (Ok, i dont play games... guess you can feel the performance-difference there).
I definitely prefer a quiet machine with internal gfx any day.
After returning the sony and looking for somethin else, internal gfx became a feature for me, not a 'lack of'.
X60s / T40p / A20m (retired)

sxr71
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:33 am
Location: New York

#25 Post by sxr71 » Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:43 pm

pianowizard wrote:
benottomex wrote:For sure a X60 series laptop is very cool to carry everywhere, maybe in the future I'll buy one.
Once you own a <3lb notebook, you will never carry your T42p ever again.
Yeah for sure. I too was in between a T series and X series due to lack of optical drive and only integrated graphics on the X. Right now I know I couldn't have made a better decision.

If I need to play video games or play a CD/DVD I use my desktop with a 8800GTS and a 24" monitor.

When I need a computer on the go, I need something that gets the job done and doesn't break my back. Get the job done it does. As for an optical drive, I don't remember the last time I used one on a laptop. I barely use my external slim drive.

sxr71
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu Aug 24, 2006 5:33 am
Location: New York

#26 Post by sxr71 » Sat Jan 27, 2007 6:46 pm

boon wrote:the xps kinda destroy the purpose of a light notebook. The sony sz series does have a decent video card too, and also same weight as the xps with a 13.3 screen.

Still a dedicated video card would be great in a thinkpad too, a thinkpad x31/32 alike, with directx10 :)
Integrated DX10 should be here with Santa Rosa.

Post Reply
  • Similar Topics
    Replies
    Views
    Last post

Return to “Thinkpad X6x Series incl. X6x Tablet”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests