New X60s with Core 2 Duo L7400 1.5 GHz 4MB L2 cache
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 2:33 am
Since yesterday the Lenovo site is offering an option for the X60s Ultralight with the L7400 Low Voltage Core 2 Duo chip.
This LV Core 2 Duo chip needs 17W as against the 15W of the older L2400 chip - can anyone hazard a guess as to the effect on performance and battery life for an X60s using the new chipset? My own guess is slightly better performance even with the reduced clock speed (1.50 GHz on the Core 2 Duo against 1.67 GHz on the Core Duo) and a negligible difference in battery life.
I need to replace my X41 which is on it's 3rd replacement 60GB HD in 2 years, which is yet again showing signs of failing, and I am leaning towards the new Core 2 Duo model of the X60s rather than the older model with Core Duo. Current orders are showing shipping dates around 2 weeks away, so I need to order quickly so that the machine can be delivered to my friend in the US in time for me to collect it when I visit on vacation in the 2nd week of May.
For me, low temp and battery life are far more important than raw speed - I think the Core 2 Duo has a reputation for running much cooler than the Core Duo, but since the Intel chart shows both CPUs as being 65-nm parts I don't know if there will be much difference.
All opinions welcome.
BillyB
This LV Core 2 Duo chip needs 17W as against the 15W of the older L2400 chip - can anyone hazard a guess as to the effect on performance and battery life for an X60s using the new chipset? My own guess is slightly better performance even with the reduced clock speed (1.50 GHz on the Core 2 Duo against 1.67 GHz on the Core Duo) and a negligible difference in battery life.
I need to replace my X41 which is on it's 3rd replacement 60GB HD in 2 years, which is yet again showing signs of failing, and I am leaning towards the new Core 2 Duo model of the X60s rather than the older model with Core Duo. Current orders are showing shipping dates around 2 weeks away, so I need to order quickly so that the machine can be delivered to my friend in the US in time for me to collect it when I visit on vacation in the 2nd week of May.
For me, low temp and battery life are far more important than raw speed - I think the Core 2 Duo has a reputation for running much cooler than the Core Duo, but since the Intel chart shows both CPUs as being 65-nm parts I don't know if there will be much difference.
All opinions welcome.
BillyB