Page 1 of 1
what is the maximum ram allowed on a x60s?
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 8:13 pm
by ryan123
When i went to lenovos online store they have the options of getting 4gb of ram on the x60s (2gbX2) but when I tried to do the crucial system scanner test it says i can only have a maximum of 2 gb.
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 9:01 pm
by Trekk69
I believe that it can only use 3gbs, however, I've been reading posts and people are suggesting that with santa rosa it will be able to use all 4gbs
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:54 am
by nogen
Just a minor correction. The X60s will not come with Santa Rosa. X61 however...
If you are using Windows XP/Vista 32bit, the maximum windows will show is 3.25GB of RAM. Even if your system has 4GB.
I believe that X60s will allow installation of 4GB, but it will not be able to "see" more than 3GB. But correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 5:26 am
by snessiram
If I recall right, windows xp/vista 32bit only sees 3GB (due to limitation of logical addressing) while windows xp/vista 64bit will see 4GB.
If I'm not mistaken dualcore is 32bit-only while core2duo supports both 32bit and 64bit.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:53 am
by gunston
4GB would be very smooth for Vista!
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 12:52 pm
by FredFromNYC
From the Wikipedia article on
Windows XP Professional x64 Edition: "Windows XP 32-bit is limited to a total of 4 GB, which is, by default, equally divided between Kernel and application usage. Using the /3GB switch in the boot.ini file forces Windows to limit the kernel to the upper 1GB and provides up to 3GB for applications."
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:01 pm
by tinue
The X60s has two memory slots, and allows 2GB modules (according to document MIGR-63277). This means that up to 4GB can be physically installed.
At the same time, Lenovo claims in document MIGR-55644 that the X60s only supports 2GB max.
I wonder where the memory beyond 2GB disappears, or is one of the above documents wrong?
Regards, Martin
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 4:23 pm
by Dimitri_P
3GBs max visible to OS, even if 2x2GB installed.
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 6:02 pm
by ryan123
does anyone here actually have 4gb or 3 gb of ram on their x60s?
Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 10:21 am
by adrianaitken
I've got 2x 2Gb installed on my X60 and on the boot screen have 2 menu options 'with /3GB' and 'plain'. Either option shows as having only 3.0 Gb RAM (via properties page on right clicking 'My Computer') and both say 'PAE' .
Does this mean I really do have 3 Gb of RAM for my apps regardless or is it still sharing it with Windows (XP Pro SP2) ?
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 4:54 am
by berlin
ryan123 wrote:does anyone here actually have 4gb or 3 gb of ram on their x60s?
Me, but I can't tell the difference from 1GB to 3GB --only when I changed my 5400rpm drive to 7200rpm... but still very little performance increase. so I'm planning to remove 1GB of ram and I might switch back to the 5400RPM HDD.
Then again, I don't have any apps on my X60s. I just got it a few weeks ago.
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 5:28 am
by tomh009
adrianaitken wrote:I've got 2x 2Gb installed on my X60 and on the boot screen have 2 menu options 'with /3GB' and 'plain'. Either option shows as having only 3.0 Gb RAM (via properties page on right clicking 'My Computer') and both say 'PAE' .
Does this mean I really do have 3 Gb of RAM for my apps regardless or is it still sharing it with Windows (XP Pro SP2) ?
You have 3 GB visible and available to Windows. The "Napa" chipset can only address 3 GB of memory, regardless of the OS.
Posted: Thu May 24, 2007 7:39 am
by adrianaitken
Hmmm, to show how old I am...
I remember when the original XT and AT and '386' computers came out. Limited to 640K of RAM and the top memory was reserved for graphics, BIOS etc. This led to a bodged effort to access more memory (Expanded and extended).
Windows came along and helped everyone forget memory limits but oh look. Intel once again screw things up 'because no-one will ever need more than 3 Gig of RAM' - paraphrasing a well known saying!!
Surely someone should sue the pants off Intel for being complete idiots and not learning from their own historic mistakes ?