Page 1 of 1

Batteries: X60s vs X61s

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:23 am
by Jackboot
Why are the batteries for the X60s and X61s different?

In the power manager under "battery information" my X60s says the FRU part number is 42T5249 while the X61s says the FRU part number is 93P5030.

Why would the FRU part numbers be different? Shouldn't they take the same replacement battery?

Additionally, My X60s battery (Sanyo) holds a full capacity charge of 80.34 Wh despite the design capacity being only 74.88 Wh. That is a significant difference! My X61s battery (Sony) holds a full capacity charge of exactly 74.88 Wh (same as design capacity).

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 11:56 am
by tomh009
There are frequently multiple battery FRUs that are interchangeable. The HMM lists the following 8-cell batteries:

Sanyo 92P1171
Sony 92P1173

and

Sanyo 93P5029
Sanyo 42T4506
Sanyo 40Y7904
Sony 93P5030

I didn't find a 42T5249 listed, though.

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 6:58 pm
by gunston
how long can the battery life last for these 2 different models?

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 7:40 pm
by tomh009
Apart from potential battery explosions :) the Li-ion batteries really have very similar characteristics and their life is primarily determined by your usage patterns.

So what does that mean? Well, my trusty X31 has 29.37 Wh of remaining capacity out of the original 47.52 Wh. Not stellar, but at 62% of original, it's by no means dead yet. And that's after two and a half years 825 charge cycles, so you can indeed get a lot out of a Li-ion battery!

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 10:44 pm
by Comage
You should try performing a battery reset in your power manager, the readings are definitely off.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 4:54 am
by tomh009
Why do you think the readings are off? And in what way?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 6:53 am
by Comage
I meant that it being "off" in a sense that the current listed full capacity charge being higher than the design capacity.

I encountered that problem initially too. It had gone from a value same as the design capacity, to a value higher (which I then performed a reset).

The battery had actually lost capacity at that point of time, but something was wrong with the estimation of power manager, so the values went off, higher than the designed value.

Nothing much to worry about that though.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 7:14 am
by tomh009
Yes, the "full charge capacity" is an estimate and can drift ... though in my case it's well down by now.

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 12:09 pm
by Jackboot
Comage wrote:I meant that it being "off" in a sense that the current listed full capacity charge being higher than the design capacity.

I encountered that problem initially too. It had gone from a value same as the design capacity, to a value higher (which I then performed a reset).

The battery had actually lost capacity at that point of time, but something was wrong with the estimation of power manager, so the values went off, higher than the designed value.

Nothing much to worry about that though.
The battery I have for my X60s with the full capacity higher than the design capacity is brand new - only 6 charge cycles - and it has been like this from new.

Do you really think it needs a reset? Isn't it possible for a battery to have a higher full capacity than its design capacity?

Posted: Fri Jul 20, 2007 10:11 pm
by Comage
Well it won't result in any performance issues, so you can leave it there if you wish too.

Sometimes batteries stay in warehouses for quite some time before they are shipped out to customers, so that might account for the difference.

However, I would check to make sure that the battery drains "linearly" (i.e. there is no jump from like 70% to 60% under a constant power load). If there is, it means the li-ion crystals have crystalised (memory effect).

I had one Sanyo exchanged within the first year because it exhibited this problem.