Model with 4 cell slimline battery is much lighter than one with 8 cell extended.
UL is brighter than regular LCD, but seems to have a narrower angle of view and a somewhat different color temperature.
Right palmrest a bit hotter on one than the other.
The last two issues could well be unit-to-unit variations and may be noticeable only because I'm paying a lot of attention.
Comparison of two X61Ss
I'm not the only one having issues with the TMD screen:
I had the TDM SXGA+ , and was very disappointed. Viewing angles was "fair" in horizontal direction, but down right awful vertically to the point where it was around useless to me (Im a bit picky though). Everything had a slightly blue cast to it too. Contrast seemed a bit on the low side too. Enabling cleartype gave weird red "cast" to certain fonts (most notably in outlook 2003 where I had to change some of the default fonts).
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... iew#262485
The regular screen has a better angle of view, is a touch crisper and a more uniform appearance. With the TMD, I can't find an angle of view so that the top and bottom are as bright as each other or a viewpoint so that the left edge and middle are the same brightness, in each case compared to the regular screen.
The differences are subtle, but alas obvious once you are sensitive to them.
The TMD is brighter, but I usually turn it down to the point it's no brighter than the regular screen.
I'd thought the TMD had a bluish cast (as the other poster suggests), but the regular has a yellowish cast.
I wonder if this is unit-to-unit variation or a common issue with Thinkpad LCDs. I'm guessing warranty repair would claim it's within spec.
I had the TDM SXGA+ , and was very disappointed. Viewing angles was "fair" in horizontal direction, but down right awful vertically to the point where it was around useless to me (Im a bit picky though). Everything had a slightly blue cast to it too. Contrast seemed a bit on the low side too. Enabling cleartype gave weird red "cast" to certain fonts (most notably in outlook 2003 where I had to change some of the default fonts).
http://forum.thinkpads.com/viewtopic.ph ... iew#262485
The regular screen has a better angle of view, is a touch crisper and a more uniform appearance. With the TMD, I can't find an angle of view so that the top and bottom are as bright as each other or a viewpoint so that the left edge and middle are the same brightness, in each case compared to the regular screen.
The differences are subtle, but alas obvious once you are sensitive to them.
The TMD is brighter, but I usually turn it down to the point it's no brighter than the regular screen.
I'd thought the TMD had a bluish cast (as the other poster suggests), but the regular has a yellowish cast.
I wonder if this is unit-to-unit variation or a common issue with Thinkpad LCDs. I'm guessing warranty repair would claim it's within spec.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 4 Replies
- 2212 Views
-
Last post by jronald
Wed Feb 22, 2017 6:48 pm
-
-
R61: Takes Two Tries to Start
by ArtShapiro » Mon Jan 02, 2017 3:58 pm » in ThinkPad R, A, G and Z Series - 7 Replies
- 1773 Views
-
Last post by jaspen-meyer
Sun Jan 08, 2017 3:15 am
-
-
-
Models that support two ultrabays
by Whitieiii » Sat Jan 21, 2017 6:49 am » in GENERAL ThinkPad News/Comments & Questions - 5 Replies
- 549 Views
-
Last post by Whitieiii
Sat Jan 21, 2017 4:34 pm
-
-
-
SOLD Two *mint-condition* 14.1" SXGA+ screens (Quanta QD14FL07-LK11) -- great for 4:3 T61 or 14" T601f!
by tpdude4 » Thu Feb 16, 2017 12:29 pm » in Marketplace - Forum Members only - 3 Replies
- 387 Views
-
Last post by tpdude4
Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:41 pm
-
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests



